Literature DB >> 28550610

Association Between Patient-Centered Medical Home Capabilities and Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries Seeking Care from Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Justin W Timbie1, Peter S Hussey2, Claude M Setodji3, Amii Kress4, Rosalie Malsberger2, Tara A Lavelle5, Mark W Friedberg2,6,7, Suzanne G Wensky8, Katherine D Giuriceo8, Katherine L Kahn9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered medical home (PCMH) models of primary care have the potential to expand access, improve population health, and lower costs. Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) were early adopters of PCMH models.
OBJECTIVE: We measured PCMH capabilities in a diverse nationwide sample of FQHCs and assessed the relationship between PCMH capabilities and Medicare beneficiary outcomes.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, propensity score-weighted, multivariable regression analysis. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 804 FQHC sites that applied to a nationwide FQHC PCMH initiative and 231,163 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who received a plurality of their primary care services from these sites. MAIN MEASURES: PCMH capabilities were self-reported using the National Committee for Quality Assurance's (NCQA's) 2011 application for PCMH recognition. Measures of utilization, continuity of care, quality, and Medicare expenditures were derived from Medicare claims covering a 1-year period ending October 2011. KEY
RESULTS: Nearly 88% of sites were classified as having PCMH capabilities equivalent to NCQA Level 1, 2, or 3 PCMH recognition. These more advanced sites were associated with 228 additional FQHC visits per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries (95% CI: 176, 278), compared with less advanced sites; 0.02 points higher practice-level continuity of care (95% CI: 0.01, 0.03); and a greater likelihood of administering two of four recommended diabetes tests. However, more advanced sites were also associated with 181 additional visits to specialists per 1000 beneficiaries (95% CI: 124, 232) and 64 additional visits to emergency departments (95% CI: 35, 89)-but with no differences in inpatient utilization. More advanced sites had higher Part B expenditures ($111 per beneficiary [95% CI: $61, $158]) and total Medicare expenditures of $353 [95% CI: $65, $614]).
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of PCMH models in FQHCs may be associated with improved primary care for Medicare beneficiaries. Expanded access to care, in combination with slower development of key PCMH capabilities, may explain higher Medicare expenditures and other types of utilization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; dual eligible; federally qualified health center; patient-centered medical home; quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28550610      PMCID: PMC5570742          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4078-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  23 in total

1.  Predictive margins with survey data.

Authors:  B I Graubard; E L Korn
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A graphical method for assessing risk factor threshold values using the generalized additive model: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Claude Messan Setodji; Maren Scheuner; James S Pankow; Roger S Blumenthal; Haiying Chen; Emmett Keeler
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03

3.  Medicaid patients seen at federally qualified health centers use hospital services less than those seen by private providers.

Authors:  Jennifer Rothkopf; Katie Brookler; Sandeep Wadhwa; Michael Sajovetz
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Federally qualified health centers and private practice performance on ambulatory care measures.

Authors:  L Elizabeth Goldman; Philip W Chu; Huong Tran; Max J Romano; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Adoption and use of electronic health records among federally qualified health centers grew substantially during 2010-12.

Authors:  Emily B Jones; Michael F Furukawa
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Patient-Centered Medical Home Recognition and Clinical Performance in U.S. Community Health Centers.

Authors:  Leiyu Shi; De-Chih Lee; Michelle Chung; Hailun Liang; Diana Lock; Alek Sripipatana
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Federally Qualified Health Center Use Among Dual Eligibles: Rates Of Hospitalizations And Emergency Department Visits.

Authors:  Brad Wright; Andrew J Potter; Amal Trivedi
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Association between participation in a multipayer medical home intervention and changes in quality, utilization, and costs of care.

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Eric C Schneider; Meredith B Rosenthal; Kevin G Volpp; Rachel M Werner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Two-Year Costs and Quality in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.

Authors:  Stacy B Dale; Arkadipta Ghosh; Deborah N Peikes; Timothy J Day; Frank B Yoon; Erin Fries Taylor; Kaylyn Swankoski; Ann S O'Malley; Patrick H Conway; Rahul Rajkumar; Matthew J Press; Laura Sessums; Randall Brown
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model.

Authors:  Gregory C Pope; John Kautter; Randall P Ellis; Arlene S Ash; John Z Ayanian; Lisa I Lezzoni; Melvin J Ingber; Jesse M Levy; John Robst
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2004
View more
  7 in total

1.  Capsule Commentary on Timbie et al., Association Between Patient-Centered Medical Home Capabilities and Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries Seeking Care from Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Leila Kahwati
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Specialized primary care medical home: A positive impact on continuity of care among autistic adults.

Authors:  Brittany N Hand; Daniel L Coury; Susan White; Amy R Darragh; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Lauren Harris; Anne Longo; Jennifer H Garvin
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2020-09-09

3.  Patient, Family, and Community Advisory Councils in Health Care and Research: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Benjamin J Oldfield; Marcus A Harrison; Inginia Genao; Ann T Greene; Mary Ellen Pappas; Janis G Glover; Marjorie S Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Medicaid Expansion And Community Health Centers: Care Quality And Service Use Increased For Rural Patients.

Authors:  Megan B Cole; Brad Wright; Ira B Wilson; Omar Galárraga; Amal N Trivedi
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Latinos understanding the need for adherence in diabetes (LUNA-D): a randomized controlled trial of an integrated team-based care intervention among Latinos with diabetes.

Authors:  Gregory A Talavera; Sheila F Castañeda; Paulina M Mendoza; Maria Lopez-Gurrola; Scott Roesch; Margaret S Pichardo; Melawhy L Garcia; Fatima Muñoz; Linda C Gallo
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.626

6.  Effects of a Specialized Primary Care Facility on Preventive Service Use Among Autistic Adults: a Retrospective Claims Study.

Authors:  Brittany N Hand; Daniel Gilmore; Daniel L Coury; Amy R Darragh; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Christopher Hanks; Jennifer H Garvin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 6.473

7.  The Medical Home Initiative in Italy: an Analysis of Changes in Healthcare Utilization.

Authors:  Scott W Keith; Dexter Waters; Matthew Alcusky; Sarah Hegarty; Niusha Jafari; Marco Lombardi; Monica Pini; Vittorio Maio
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 6.473

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.