BACKGROUND: The 2010 Affordable Care Act relies on Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and FQHC look-alikes (look-alikes) to provide care for newly insured patients, but ties increased funding to demonstrated quality and efficiency. PURPOSE: To compare FQHC and look-alike physician performance with private practice primary care physicians (PCPs) on ambulatory care quality measures. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional analysis of visits in the 2006-2008 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Performance of FQHCs and look-alikes on 18 quality measures was compared with private practice PCPs. Data analysis was completed in 2011. RESULTS: Compared to private practice PCPs, FQHCs and look-alikes performed better on six measures (p<0.05); worse on diet counseling in at-risk adolescents (26% vs 36%, p=0.05); and no differently on 11 measures. Higher performance occurred in ACE inhibitors use for congestive heart failure (51% vs 37%, p=0.004); aspirin use in coronary artery disease (CAD; 57% vs 44%, p=0.004); β-blocker use for CAD (59% vs 47%, p=0.01); no use of benzodiazepines in depression (91% vs 84%, p=0.008); blood pressure screening (90% vs 86%, p<0.001); and screening electrocardiogram (EKG) avoidance in low-risk patients (99% vs 93%, p<0.001). Adjusting for patient characteristics yielded similar results, except that private practice PCPs no longer performed better on any measures. CONCLUSIONS: FQHCs and look-alikes demonstrated equal or better performance than private practice PCPs on select quality measures despite serving patients who have more chronic disease and socioeconomic complexity. These findings can provide policymakers with some reassurance as to the quality of chronic disease and preventive care at Federally Qualified Health Centers and look-alikes, as they plan to use these health centers to serve 20 million newly insured individuals.
BACKGROUND: The 2010 Affordable Care Act relies on Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and FQHC look-alikes (look-alikes) to provide care for newly insured patients, but ties increased funding to demonstrated quality and efficiency. PURPOSE: To compare FQHC and look-alike physician performance with private practice primary care physicians (PCPs) on ambulatory care quality measures. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional analysis of visits in the 2006-2008 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Performance of FQHCs and look-alikes on 18 quality measures was compared with private practice PCPs. Data analysis was completed in 2011. RESULTS: Compared to private practice PCPs, FQHCs and look-alikes performed better on six measures (p<0.05); worse on diet counseling in at-risk adolescents (26% vs 36%, p=0.05); and no differently on 11 measures. Higher performance occurred in ACE inhibitors use for congestive heart failure (51% vs 37%, p=0.004); aspirin use in coronary artery disease (CAD; 57% vs 44%, p=0.004); β-blocker use for CAD (59% vs 47%, p=0.01); no use of benzodiazepines in depression (91% vs 84%, p=0.008); blood pressure screening (90% vs 86%, p<0.001); and screening electrocardiogram (EKG) avoidance in low-risk patients (99% vs 93%, p<0.001). Adjusting for patient characteristics yielded similar results, except that private practice PCPs no longer performed better on any measures. CONCLUSIONS: FQHCs and look-alikes demonstrated equal or better performance than private practice PCPs on select quality measures despite serving patients who have more chronic disease and socioeconomic complexity. These findings can provide policymakers with some reassurance as to the quality of chronic disease and preventive care at Federally Qualified Health Centers and look-alikes, as they plan to use these health centers to serve 20 million newly insured individuals.
Authors: Rosanne M Leipzig; Evelyn P Whitlock; Tracy A Wolff; Mary B Barton; Yvonne L Michael; Russell Harris; Diana Petitti; Timothy Wilt; Al Siu Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-12-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Marilyn Falik; Jack Needleman; Robert Herbert; Barbara Wells; Robert Politzer; M Beth Benedict Journal: J Ambul Care Manage Date: 2006 Jan-Mar
Authors: Ellen Funkhouser; Thomas K Houston; Deborah A Levine; Joshua Richman; Jeroan J Allison; Catarina I Kiefe Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2010-12-07
Authors: Bruce E Landon; LeRoi S Hicks; A James O'Malley; Tracy A Lieu; Thomas Keegan; Barbara J McNeil; Edward Guadagnoli Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marshall H Chin; Melinda L Drum; Myriam Guillen; Ann Rimington; Jessica R Levie; Anne C Kirchhoff; Michael T Quinn; Cynthia T Schaefer Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Robert S Nocon; Sang Mee Lee; Ravi Sharma; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Dana B Mukamel; Yue Gao; Laura M White; Leiyu Shi; Marshall H Chin; Neda Laiteerapong; Elbert S Huang Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Steffani R Bailey; Jean P O'Malley; Rachel Gold; John Heintzman; Sonja Likumahuwa; Jennifer E DeVoe Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Stephan Lindner; Leif I Solberg; William L Miller; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Miguel Marino; K John McConnell; Samuel T Edwards; Kurt C Stange; Rachel J Springer; Deborah J Cohen Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2019 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Ellen T Kurtzman; Burt S Barnow; Jean E Johnson; Samuel J Simmens; Donna Lind Infeld; Fitzhugh Mullan Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Neda Laiteerapong; James Kirby; Yue Gao; Tzy-Chyi Yu; Ravi Sharma; Robert Nocon; Sang Mee Lee; Marshall H Chin; Aviva G Nathan; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Elbert S Huang Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Miguel Marino; Steffani R Bailey; Rachel Gold; Megan J Hoopes; Jean P O'Malley; Nathalie Huguet; John Heintzman; Charles Gallia; K John McConnell; Jennifer E DeVoe Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 5.043