Literature DB >> 25515944

Does the ingrowth surface make a difference? A retrieval study of 423 cementless acetabular components.

Eric Swarts1, Thomas A Bucher2, Michael Phillips3, Francis H X Yap4.   

Abstract

The effect of factors such as design, alloy and coating type on bony or fibrous tissue ingrowth was evaluated in a study of 423 retrieved cementless acetabular shells representing 16 shell designs. Small-beaded (250μm) porous coatings, either with or without hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings, proved to be the superior porous surface for bone ingrowth. Small-beaded shells that were Duofix coated had predominantly fibrous tissue ingrowth. In addition to bead size, alloy type and surface type have significant effect on bone ingrowth. In contrast, there is no significant association between bone ingrowth and time in situ, with most bone ingrowth occurring early. Although roughened, press-fit shells have acceptable clinical and Registry data, they showed some of the lowest ingrowth/ongrowth scores of all the shells tested. Crown
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acetabular shells; bone ingrowth; implant retrieval

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25515944     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction for chronic infection after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: results of sixteen cases after five years of follow-up.

Authors:  Kun-Hui Chen; Shang-Wen Tsai; Po-Kuei Wu; Cheng-Fong Chen; Hsin-Yi Wang; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  A prospective osseointegration retrieval analysis of second generation cementless shells.

Authors:  M Curtin; E Pomeroy; M Grigoras; T Murphy; Fiachra E Rowan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-06-03

3.  [Bone defect adjusted strategy in revision arthroplasty of the hip : Wich implant in wich situation? Innovations and approved methods].

Authors:  B S Craiovan; J Grifka; A Keshmiri; B Moser; M Wörner; T Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Retention of the well-fixed implant in the single-stage exchange for chronic infected total hip arthroplasty: an average of five years of follow-up.

Authors:  Baochao Ji; Boyong Xu; Wentao Guo; Aili Rehei; Wenbo Mu; Desheng Yang; Li Cao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Radiolucencies surrounding acetabular components with three-dimensional coatings: artifact or real?

Authors:  Ahmad Faizan; Philip Chuang; Carlos Aponte; Vincent Moretti; Peter F Sharkey
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-07-26

6.  Characterization of dimensional, morphological and morphometric features of retrieved 3D-printed acetabular cups for hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lorenzo Dall'Ava; Harry Hothi; Johann Henckel; Anna Di Laura; Paul Shearing; Alister Hart
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.