Literature DB >> 28550251

When Patient Engagement and Research Ethics Collide: Lessons from a Dementia Forum.

Julie M Robillard1, Tanya L Feng1.   

Abstract

The importance of patient engagement in research has been gaining recognition since the turn of the 21st century. However, little is known about the perspectives of people with dementia on the process of discovery. To fill this gap and to inform priorities in patient engagement in the context of dementia research, the Clinic for Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders at the University of British Columbia hosted an interactive session for members of the patient community and of the general public to share their views on various ethical aspects of the research process. Results from the session indicate that several current research ethics policies and norms in dementia research are not in line with participants' preferences. Here we discuss the importance of bridging the gap between researchers and patients and call for reforms in current standards of dementia research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; dementia; ethics; informed consent; public policy; research ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28550251     DOI: 10.3233/JAD-161285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis        ISSN: 1387-2877            Impact factor:   4.472


  10 in total

1.  Planning Ahead for Dementia Research Participation: Insights from a Survey of Older Australians and Implications for Ethics, Law and Practice.

Authors:  Nola Ries; Elise Mansfield; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Passively-Measured Routine Home Computer Activity and Application Use Can Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment and Correlate with Important Cognitive Functions in Older Adulthood.

Authors:  John P K Bernstein; Katherine E Dorociak; Nora Mattek; Mira Leese; Zachary T Beattie; Jeffrey A Kaye; Adriana Hughes
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 3.  Partnering with frail or seriously ill patients in research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Claire Ludwig; Ian D Graham; Wendy Gifford; Josee Lavoie; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2020-09-11

4.  The Acceptability of Online Consent in a Self-Test Serosurvey of Responders to the 2014-2016 West African Ebola Outbreak.

Authors:  Catherine R McGowan; Catherine F Houlihan; Patricia Kingori; Judith R Glynn
Journal:  Public Health Ethics       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.706

5.  We need to think about data governance for dementia research in a digital era.

Authors:  Richard Milne; Carol Brayne
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 6.982

Review 6.  Ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review.

Authors:  Claire Ludwig; Ian D Graham; Josee Lavoie; Wendy Gifford; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2021-01-31

7.  The full spectrum of ethical issues in dementia research: findings of a systematic qualitative review.

Authors:  Tim G Götzelmann; Hannes Kahrass; Daniel Strech
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 8.  Partnering with patients in healthcare research: a scoping review of ethical issues, challenges, and recommendations for practice.

Authors:  Joé T Martineau; Asma Minyaoui; Antoine Boivin
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 9.  Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting.

Authors:  Emily Skelton; Nicholas Drey; Mary Rutherford; Susan Ayers; Christina Malamateniou
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Returning individual-specific results of a dementia prevalence study: insights from prospective participants living in Switzerland.

Authors:  Marta Fadda; Maddalena Fiordelli; Rebecca Amati; Ilaria Falvo; Aliaa Ibnidris; Samia Hurst; Emiliano Albanese
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.485

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.