Literature DB >> 28549517

Association between Tumor Regression Rate and Gene Expression Profile after Iodine 125 Plaque Radiotherapy for Uveal Melanoma.

Prithvi Mruthyunjaya1, Michael I Seider2, Sandra Stinnett3, Amy Schefler4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gene expression profile (GEP) testing segregates uveal melanoma (UM) into 2 main prognostic classes. It is unknown if a greater tumor regression response after iodine 125 (I125) brachytherapy correlates with class 2 GEP status. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a significant relationship between the rate of UM height regression and GEP classification testing after I125 plaque brachytherapy.
DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Adult UM patients treated with I125 plaque brachytherapy who had concurrent tumor biopsy at the time of surgery with a GEP test result from January 1, 2010 through June 30, 2014.
METHODS: Baseline clinical data and GEP class assignments were obtained. The ultrasonographic tumor height was recorded at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and at the most recent final follow-up visits. Subanalysis of paired cases based on pretreatment ultrasound height was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, the Fisher exact test, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage change in tumor height from baseline.
RESULTS: A total of 353 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 2.1 years (range, 0.5-5.3 years). Gene expression profile status was class 1 in 247 tumors (70%) and class 2 in 106 tumors (30%). Increased patient age, larger tumor dimensions, and greater tumor thickness were associated with class 2 GEP status (P = 0.006, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). The percentage reduction in tumor height from baseline was significantly greater in class 1 than class 2 tumors at 3 months (17.5% vs. 11.8%; P = 0.007) and 6 months (26.8% vs. 17.1%; P = 0.007), respectively, but there was no significant difference in reduction between class 1 and 2 tumors at 9 months (P = 0.26) and 12 months (P = 0.57) after treatment. Class 1A and 1B tumors showed similar reduction compared with class 2 tumors (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Class 1 UM tumors tend to regress more rapidly than class 2 tumors in the first 6 months after plaque radiotherapy. Class 1A and 1B tumors regress at similar rates after plaque radiotherapy.
Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Ophthalmology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28549517     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  10 in total

1.  CORRELATION OF GENE EXPRESSION PROFILE STATUS AND AMERICAN JOINT COMMISSION ON CANCER STAGE IN UVEAL MELANOMA.

Authors:  Duncan E Berry; Amy C Schefler; Michael I Seider; Miguel Materin; Sandra Stinnett; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Multi-center analysis of intraocular biopsy technique and outcomes for uveal melanoma: Ocular Oncology Study Consortium report 4.

Authors:  Michael I Seider; Duncan E Berry; Amy C Schefler; Miguel Materin; Sandra Stinnett; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Ruthenium-106 plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanoma: analysis of tumor dimension and location on anatomical and functional results.

Authors:  Reza Mirshahi; Ahad Sedaghat; Ramin Jaberi; Zohreh Azma; Mehdi Mazloumi; Masood Naseripour
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Practice Patterns for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma with Iodine-125 Plaque Brachytherapy: Ocular Oncology Study Consortium Report 5.

Authors:  Christina Binder; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Amy C Schefler; Michael I Seider; Richard Crilly; Arthur Hung; Sheridan Meltsner; Yvonne Mowery; David G Kirsch; Bin S Teh; Richard L S Jennelle; Matthew T Studenski; Wu Liu; Choonik Lee; James A Hayman; Brian Kastner; Michael Hadsell; Alison H Skalet
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2019-12-11

Review 5.  Prognostic gene expression profiling in melanoma: necessary steps to incorporate into clinical practice.

Authors:  Douglas Grossman; Caroline C Kim; Rebecca I Hartman; Elizabeth Berry; Kelly C Nelson; Nwanneka Okwundu; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Sancy A Leachman; Susan M Swetter
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2019-12-17

6.  Regression patterns of uveal melanoma after iodine-125 plaque brachytherapy.

Authors:  Rui Fang; Heng Wang; Yang Li; Yue-Ming Liu; Wen-Bin Wei
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Radiological and clinical findings in uveal melanoma treated by plaque interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy): Visual atlas and literature review on response assessment.

Authors:  Bruno Fionda; Monica Maria Pagliara; Valentina Lancellotta; Carmela Grazia Caputo; Calogero Casà; Maria Grazia Sammarco; Elisa Placidi; Patrizia Cornacchione; Francesco Boselli; Roberto Iezzi; Cesare Colosimo; Luca Tagliaferri; Maria Antonietta Blasi
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2022-02-04

8.  Relationship between gene expression profile class and tumor thickness regression after plaque brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma.

Authors:  Arjun Sharma; John E Mignano; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2022-07-16

9.  CORRELATION OF GENE EXPRESSION PROFILE STATUS AND AMERICAN JOINT COMMISSION ON CANCER STAGE IN UVEAL MELANOMA.

Authors:  Duncan E Berry; Amy C Schefler; Michael I Seider; Miguel Materin; Sandra Stinnett; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.975

Review 10.  Recent advancements in the management of retinoblastoma and uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Amy C Schefler; Ryan S Kim
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-04-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.