Duncan E Berry1, Amy C Schefler2,3, Michael I Seider4,5, Miguel Materin1, Sandra Stinnett1, Prithvi Mruthyunjaya6,7. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Blanton Eye Institute at Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas. 3. Retina Consultants of Houston, Houston, Texas. 4. The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, California. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, The University of California, San Francisco, California. 6. Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California; and. 7. Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the relationship between gene expression profile (GEP) subclass and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage in patients with uveal melanoma (UM). METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter study was undertaken with patients entered from nine major ocular oncology centers from across the United States. Three hundred sixty eligible patients had UM and underwent I-125 plaque brachytherapy with concurrent tumor biopsy with GEP testing between January 1, 2010, and October 28, 2014. Patient demographics and UM features were analyzed by both GEP and AJCC status. RESULTS: Gene expression profile class divided the cohort into three groups: Class 1a (n = 186), Class 1b (n = 77), and Class 2 (n = 113). When classified using AJCC staging criteria, we found the following: Stage I in 91 cases (25.3%), Stage IIA in 143 cases (39.7%), Stage IIB in 89 cases (24.7%), Stage IIIA in 36 cases (10%), and Stage IIIB in 1 case (0.3%). There were no Stage IV cases, as lymph node and metastatic data were not collected as a part of this study. Among Stage I tumors, both high tumor height and high largest basal diameter were associated with a higher frequency of Class 2 status (P < 0.05). As UMs progress to a larger AJCC tumor group (T1-T4), the odds ratio of having a worse prognosis based on GEP class was 1.75 (95% CI, 1.36-2.25; P < 0.001). Similarly, as UMs progress to a higher AJCC stage, the odds ratio of having a worse prognosis based on GEP class was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.36-2.10; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This report details the differences in clinical features between GEP subclasses and how they are distributed among the AJCC stages. When the tumors were grouped by AJCC staging criteria, both larger AJCC tumor (T) group and worsening AJCC stage were associated with worsening predicted prognosis, based on GEP subclass.
PURPOSE: To study the relationship between gene expression profile (GEP) subclass and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage in patients with uveal melanoma (UM). METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter study was undertaken with patients entered from nine major ocular oncology centers from across the United States. Three hundred sixty eligible patients had UM and underwent I-125 plaque brachytherapy with concurrent tumor biopsy with GEP testing between January 1, 2010, and October 28, 2014. Patient demographics and UM features were analyzed by both GEP and AJCC status. RESULTS: Gene expression profile class divided the cohort into three groups: Class 1a (n = 186), Class 1b (n = 77), and Class 2 (n = 113). When classified using AJCC staging criteria, we found the following: Stage I in 91 cases (25.3%), Stage IIA in 143 cases (39.7%), Stage IIB in 89 cases (24.7%), Stage IIIA in 36 cases (10%), and Stage IIIB in 1 case (0.3%). There were no Stage IV cases, as lymph node and metastatic data were not collected as a part of this study. Among Stage I tumors, both high tumor height and high largest basal diameter were associated with a higher frequency of Class 2 status (P < 0.05). As UMs progress to a larger AJCC tumor group (T1-T4), the odds ratio of having a worse prognosis based on GEP class was 1.75 (95% CI, 1.36-2.25; P < 0.001). Similarly, as UMs progress to a higher AJCC stage, the odds ratio of having a worse prognosis based on GEP class was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.36-2.10; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This report details the differences in clinical features between GEP subclasses and how they are distributed among the AJCC stages. When the tumors were grouped by AJCC staging criteria, both larger AJCC tumor (T) group and worsening AJCC stage were associated with worsening predicted prognosis, based on GEP subclass.
Authors: Brandon T Nguyen; Ryan S Kim; Maria E Bretana; Eric Kegley; Amy C Schefler Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Louis Cai; Manuel Paez-Escamilla; Scott D Walter; Bercin Tarlan; Christina L Decatur; Barbara M Perez; J William Harbour Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-08-06 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Carol L Shields; Minoru Furuta; Archana Thangappan; Saya Nagori; Arman Mashayekhi; David R Lally; Cecilia C Kelly; Danielle S Rudich; Anand V Nagori; Oojwala A Wakade; Sonul Mehta; Lauren Forte; Andrew Long; Elaina F Dellacava; Bonnie Kaplan; Jerry A Shields Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2009-08
Authors: Emine Kilic; Nicole C Naus; Walter van Gils; Caroline C Klaver; Marjan E van Til; Michael M Verbiest; Theo Stijnen; Cornelia M Mooy; Dion Paridaens; H Berna Beverloo; Gregorius P Luyten; Annelies de Klein Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Matthew G Field; Christina L Decatur; Stefan Kurtenbach; Gülçin Gezgin; Pieter A van der Velden; Martine J Jager; Kaleigh N Kozak; J William Harbour Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Saman S Ahmadian; Ian J Dryden; Andrea Naranjo; Angus Toland; Romain A Cayrol; Donald E Born; Peter S Egbert; Ryanne A Brown; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Jonathan H Lin Journal: Ocul Oncol Pathol Date: 2022-03-11
Authors: Christina Binder; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Amy C Schefler; Michael I Seider; Richard Crilly; Arthur Hung; Sheridan Meltsner; Yvonne Mowery; David G Kirsch; Bin S Teh; Richard L S Jennelle; Matthew T Studenski; Wu Liu; Choonik Lee; James A Hayman; Brian Kastner; Michael Hadsell; Alison H Skalet Journal: Ocul Oncol Pathol Date: 2019-12-11