Literature DB >> 28549198

De novo transcriptome assembly of sugarcane leaves submitted to prolonged water-deficit stress.

A A Belesini1, F M S Carvalho2, B R Telles1, G M de Castro3, P F Giachetto3, J S Vantini4, S D Carlin5, J O Cazetta1, D G Pinheiro1, M I T Ferro1.   

Abstract

Sugarcane production is strongly influenced by drought, which is a limiting factor for agricultural productivity in the world. In this study, the gene expression profiles obtained by de novo assembly of the leaf transcriptome of two sugarcane cultivars that differ in their physiological response to water deficit were evaluated by the RNA-Seq method: drought-tolerant cultivar (SP81-3250) and drought-sensitive cultivar (RB855453). For this purpose, plants were grown in a greenhouse for 60 days and were then submitted to three treatments: control (-0.01 to -0.015 MPa), moderate water deficit (-0.05 to -0.055 MPa), and severe water deficit (-0.075 to -0.08 MPa). The plants were evaluated 30, 60, and 90 days after the beginning of treatment. Sequencing on an Illumina platform (RNA-Seq) generated more than one billion sequences, resulting in 177,509 and 185,153 transcripts for the tolerant and sensitive cultivar, respectively. These transcripts were aligned with sequences from Saccharum spp, Sorghum bicolor, Miscanthus giganteus, and Arabidopsis thaliana available in public databases. The differentially expressed genes detected during the prolonged period of water deficit permit to increase our understanding of the molecular patterns involved in the physiological response of the two cultivars. The tolerant cultivar differentially expressed a larger number of genes at 90 days, while in the sensitive cultivar the number of differentially expressed genes was higher in 30 days. Both cultivars perceived the lack of water, but the tolerant cultivar responded more slowly than the sensitive cultivar. The latter requires rapid activation of different water-deficit stress response mechanisms for its survival. This rapid activation of metabolic pathways in response to water stress does not appear to be the key mechanism of drought tolerance in sugarcane. There is still much to clarify on the molecular and physiological pattern of plants in response to drought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28549198     DOI: 10.4238/gmr16028845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Mol Res        ISSN: 1676-5680


  11 in total

1.  Transcriptome analysis of the effect of GA3 in sugarcane culm.

Authors:  A Chandra; K Roopendra; I Verma
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  Current breeding and genomic approaches to enhance the cane and sugar productivity under abiotic stress conditions.

Authors:  Mintu Ram Meena; Ravinder Kumar; Appunu Chinnaswamy; Ramaiyan Karuppaiyan; Neeraj Kulshreshtha; Bakshi Ram
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.893

3.  Leaf transcriptome profiling of contrasting sugarcane genotypes for drought tolerance under field conditions.

Authors:  Danyel Fernandes Contiliani; João Felipe Carlos de Oliveira Nebó; Rafael Vasconcelos Ribeiro; Larissa Mara Andrade; Rafael Fávero Peixoto Júnior; Carolina Gimiliani Lembke; Ricardo Silverio Machado; Daniel Nunes Silva; Mariana Belloti; Gláucia Mendes de Souza; Dilermando Perecin; Tiago Campos Pereira; Regina Célia de Matos Pires; Patrícia Rezende Fontoura; Marcos G A Landell; Antonio Figueira; Silvana Creste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Comparative analysis of drought-responsive transcriptomes of sugarcane genotypes with differential tolerance to drought.

Authors:  A Selvi; K Devi; R Manimekalai; P T Prathima
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Draft genome sequencing of the sugarcane hybrid SP80-3280.

Authors:  Diego Mauricio Riaño-Pachón; Lucia Mattiello
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-06-09

Review 6.  Genomic resources for energy cane breeding in the post genomics era.

Authors:  Augusto L Diniz; Sávio S Ferreira; Felipe Ten-Caten; Gabriel R A Margarido; João M Dos Santos; Geraldo V de S Barbosa; Monalisa S Carneiro; Glaucia M Souza
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 7.271

7.  Physiological changes and transcriptome profiling in Saccharum spontaneum L. leaf under water stress and re-watering conditions.

Authors:  Changning Li; Zhen Wang; Qian Nong; Li Lin; Jinlan Xie; Zhanghong Mo; Xing Huang; Xiupeng Song; Mukesh Kumar Malviya; Manoj Kumar Solanki; Yangrui Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  The Challenge of Analyzing the Sugarcane Genome.

Authors:  Prathima P Thirugnanasambandam; Nam V Hoang; Robert J Henry
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 9.  Sugarcane Omics: An Update on the Current Status of Research and Crop Improvement.

Authors:  Ahmad Ali; Mehran Khan; Rahat Sharif; Muhammad Mujtaba; San-Ji Gao
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-12

10.  Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Sugarcane Response to Aluminum Stress by RNA-Seq.

Authors:  Thiago Mateus Rosa-Santos; Renan Gonçalves da Silva; Poornasree Kumar; Pratibha Kottapalli; Chiquito Crasto; Kameswara Rao Kottapalli; Suzelei Castro França; Sonia Marli Zingaretti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.