Literature DB >> 28548120

Early Barrett esophagus-related neoplasia in segments 1 cm or longer is always associated with intestinal metaplasia.

Benjamin Michael Allanson1,2, Jessica Bonavita2, Bob Mirzai1,2, Tze Sheng Khor1,2, Spiro C Raftopoulos3, Willem Bastiaan de Boer1,2, Ian S Brown4, Marian Priyanthi Kumarasinghe1,2.   

Abstract

The assumption that intestinal metaplasia is a prerequisite for intraepithelial neoplasia/dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in the distal esophagus has been challenged by observations of adenocarcinoma without associated intestinal metaplasia. This study describes our experience of intestinal metaplasia in association with early Barrett neoplasia in distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. We reviewed the first endoscopic mucosal resection of 139 patients with biopsy-proven neoplasia. In index endoscopic mucosal resection, 110/139 (79%) cases showed intestinal metaplasia. Seven had intestinal metaplasia on prior biopsy specimens and three had intestinal metaplasia in subsequent specimens, totaling 120/139 (86%) patients showing intestinal metaplasia at some point supporting the theory of sampling error for absence of intestinal metaplasia in some cases. Those without intestinal metaplasia (13%) were enriched for higher stage disease (T1a Stolte m2 or above) supporting the assertion of obliteration of intestinal metaplasia by the advancing carcinoma. All cases of intraepithelial neoplasia and T1a Stolte m1 carcinomas had intestinal metaplasia (42/42). The average density of columnar-lined mucosa showing goblet cells was significantly less in shorter segments compared to those ≥3 cm (0.31 vs 0.51, P=0.0304). Cases where segments measured less than 1 cm were seen in a higher proportion of females and also tended to lack intestinal metaplasia. We conclude that early Barrett neoplasia is always associated with intestinal metaplasia; absence of intestinal metaplasia is attributable to sampling error or obliteration of residual intestinal metaplasia by neoplasia and those with segments less than 1 cm show atypical features for Barrett-related disease (absent intestinal metaplasia and female gender), supporting that gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas are heterogeneous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28548120     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  24 in total

1.  American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Stuart J Spechler; Prateek Sharma; Rhonda F Souza; John M Inadomi; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Circumferential location predicts the risk of high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma in short-segment Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Viraj C Kariyawasam; Michael J Bourke; Luke F Hourigan; Gary Lim; Alan Moss; Stephen J Williams; Scott B Fanning; Adrian M Chung; Karen Byth
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Standardised reporting protocol for endoscopic resection for Barrett oesophagus associated neoplasia: expert consensus recommendations.

Authors:  M P Kumarasinghe; I Brown; S Raftopoulos; M J Bourke; A Charlton; W B de Boer; R Eckstein; K Epari; A J Gill; A K Lam; T Price; C Streutker; G Y Lauwers
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.306

4.  Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Frederik Hvid-Jensen; Lars Pedersen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Peter Funch-Jensen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Is carcinoma in columnar-lined esophagus always located adjacent to intestinal metaplasia?: a histopathologic assessment.

Authors:  Junko Aida; Michael Vieth; Neil A Shepherd; Christian Ell; Andrea May; Horst Neuhaus; Tatsuro Ishizaki; Makoto Nishimura; Mutsunori Fujiwara; Tomio Arai; Kaiyo Takubo
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  H G Schmidt; R H Riddell; B Walther; D B Skinner; J F Riemann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Epidemiology and risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Côme Lepage; Antoine Drouillard; Jean-Louis Jouve; Jean Faivre
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.088

8.  Risk factors in the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Heiko Pohl; Katharina Wrobel; Christian Bojarski; Winfried Voderholzer; Amnon Sonnenberg; Thomas Rösch; Daniel C Baumgart
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Intestinal Metaplasia is Present in Most if Not All Patients Who Have Undergone Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer Smith; Alfred Garcia; Ruth Zhang; Steven DeMeester; John Vallone; Parakrama Chandrasoma
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Massimiliano di Pietro; Krish Ragunath; Yeng Ang; Jin-Yong Kang; Peter Watson; Nigel Trudgill; Praful Patel; Philip V Kaye; Scott Sanders; Maria O'Donovan; Elizabeth Bird-Lieberman; Pradeep Bhandari; Janusz A Jankowski; Stephen Attwood; Simon L Parsons; Duncan Loft; Jesper Lagergren; Paul Moayyedi; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; John de Caestecker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.