Literature DB >> 28547752

Development and psychometric validation of PUKAT 2·0, a knowledge assessment tool for pressure ulcer prevention.

Bénédicte Manderlier1, Nele Van Damme1, Katrien Vanderwee1,2, Sofie Verhaeghe1, Ann Van Hecke1, Dimitri Beeckman1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a tool to measure the knowledge of nurses on pressure ulcer prevention. PUKAT 2·0 is a revised and updated version of the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool (PUKAT) developed in 2010 at Ghent University, Belgium. The updated version was developed using state-of-the-art techniques to establish evidence concerning validity and reliability. Face and content validity were determined through a Delphi procedure including both experts from the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) and the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) (n = 15). A subsequent psychometric evaluation of 342 nurses and nursing students evaluated the item difficulty, discriminating power and quality of the response alternatives. Furthermore, construct validity was established through a test-retest procedure and the known-groups technique. The content validity was good and the difficulty level moderate. The discernment was found to be excellent: all groups with a (theoretically expected) higher level of expertise had a significantly higher score than the groups with a (theoretically expected) lower level of expertise. The stability of the tool is sufficient (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0·69). The PUKAT 2·0 demonstrated good psychometric properties and can be used and disseminated internationally to assess knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention.
© 2017 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knowledge assessment tool; Nursing; Pressure ulcers; Prevention; Psychometric validity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28547752      PMCID: PMC7949519          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  19 in total

1.  A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Alia Menezes; Lois Horovitz; Edward C Jones; Russell F Warren
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Internal consistency and Cronbach's alpha: A comment on Beeckman et al. (2010).

Authors:  Jan Kottner; David L Streiner
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 5.837

3.  Pressure ulcer knowledge among nurses in a Brazilian university hospital.

Authors:  Tânia Couto Machado Chianca; Jomara Figueiredo Pinto Rezende; Eline Lima Borges; Vera Lucia Nogueira; Maria Helena Larcher Caliri
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Knowledge, attitudes and barriers towards prevention of pressure ulcers in intensive care units: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tillan Strand; Margareta Lindgren
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 3.072

5.  Getting evidence-based pressure ulcer prevention into practice: a multi-faceted unit-tailored intervention in a hospital setting.

Authors:  Eva Sving; Marieann Högman; Anna-Greta Mamhidir; Lena Gunningberg
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  A Survey of Australian Nurses' Knowledge of Pressure Injury/Pressure Ulcer Management.

Authors:  Petra Lawrence; Paul Fulbrook; Sandra Miles
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.741

7.  Nursing students' knowledge and attitude on pressure ulcer prevention evidence-based guidelines: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Valentina Simonetti; Dania Comparcini; Maria Elena Flacco; Pamela Di Giovanni; Giancarlo Cicolini
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment knowledge of Jordanian nurses.

Authors:  Mohammad Y N Saleh; Mahmoud Al-Hussami; Denis Anthony
Journal:  J Tissue Viability       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.932

9.  Pressure ulcer prevention: development and psychometric validation of a knowledge assessment instrument.

Authors:  D Beeckman; K Vanderwee; L Demarré; L Paquay; A Van Hecke; T Defloor
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 5.837

10.  Pressure ulcer knowledge of registered nurses, assistant nurses and student nurses: a descriptive, comparative multicentre study in Sweden.

Authors:  Lena Gunningberg; Gunilla Mårtensson; Anna-Greta Mamhidir; Jan Florin; Åsa Muntlin Athlin; Carina Bååth
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.315

View more
  9 in total

1.  The Belgian pressure ulcer risk assessment project: Is assessing mobility and skin status a more accurate, reliable, and feasible approach to assess pressure ulcer risk in hospitalised patients?

Authors:  Steven Smet; Annelies de Graaf; Kris Bernaerts; Michael P Casaer; Dimitri Beeckman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Repositioning Practice of Bedridden Patients: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.

Authors:  Abdulkareem S Iblasi; Yupin Aungsuroch; Joko Gunawan; I Gede Juanamasta; Cheryl Carver
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2022-06-13

3.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the patient knowledge of, and attitudes and behaviours towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument (KPUP).

Authors:  Emer Shanley; Zena Moore; Declan Patton; Tom O Connor; Pinar Avsar; Linda Nugent; Dimitri Beeckman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Knowledge and Attitude of Community Nurses on Pressure Injury Prevention: A Cross-sectional Study in an Indonesian City.

Authors:  Sheizi Prista Sari; Irma Hj Everink; Yufitriana Amir; Christa Lohrmann; Ruud Jg Halfens; Zena Moore; Dimitri Beeckman; Jos Mga Schols
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Development and Psychometric Properties of the Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire in Spanish Nurses.

Authors:  María Dolores López-Franco; Laura Parra-Anguita; Inés María Comino-Sanz; Pedro L Pancorbo-Hidalgo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  A systematic and psychometric review of tests measuring nurses' wound care knowledge.

Authors:  Emilia Kielo; Riitta Suhonen; Minna Ylönen; Jaakko Viljamaa; Niina Wahlroos; Minna Stolt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Intensive Care Nurses' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Pressure Injury Prevention in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Li Hu; Wipa Sae-Sia; Luppana Kitrungrote
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-10-11

8.  Development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Family Caregivers at Preventing Pressure Injuries (KAP-PI) in Indonesian community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Sheizi Prista Sari; Irma H J Everink; Christa Lohrmann; Yufitriana Amir; Eka Afrima Sari; Ruud J G Halfens; Dimitri Beeckman; Jos M G A Schols
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-08-11

9.  Is Clinical Scenario Simulation Teaching Effective in Cultivating the Competency of Nursing Students to Recognize and Assess the Risk of Pressure Ulcers?

Authors:  Yan-Li Du; Chun-Hua Ma; Yu-Feng Liao; Lu Wang; Ya Zhang; Geng Niu
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-07-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.