Literature DB >> 28547660

Rib Geometry Explains Variation in Dynamic Structural Response: Potential Implications for Frontal Impact Fracture Risk.

Michelle M Murach1, Yun-Seok Kang1, Samuel D Goldman1, Michelle A Schafman1, Stephen H Schlecht2, Kevin Moorhouse3, John H Bolte1, Amanda M Agnew4.   

Abstract

The human thorax is commonly injured in motor vehicle crashes, and despite advancements in occupant safety rib fractures are highly prevalent. The objective of this study was to quantify the ability of gross and cross-sectional geometry, separately and in combination, to explain variation of human rib structural properties. One hundred and twenty-two whole mid-level ribs from 76 fresh post-mortem human subjects were tested in a dynamic frontal impact scenario. Structural properties (peak force and stiffness) were successfully predicted (p < 0.001) by rib cross-sectional geometry obtained via direct histological imaging (total area, cortical area, and section modulus) and were improved further when utilizing a combination of cross-sectional and gross geometry (robusticity, whole bone strength index). Additionally, preliminary application of a novel, adaptive thresholding technique, allowed for total area and robusticity to be measured on a subsample of standard clinical CT scans with varied success. These results can be used to understand variation in individual rib response to frontal loading as well as identify important geometric parameters, which could ultimately improve injury criteria as well as the biofidelity of anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) and finite element (FE) models of the human thorax.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-sectional geometry; Fracture risk; Rib; Robusticity; Stiffness; Thorax

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28547660      PMCID: PMC5860670          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-017-1850-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  22 in total

1.  Variation in the human ribs geometrical properties and mechanical response based on X-ray computed tomography images resolution.

Authors:  Rafał Perz; Jacek Toczyski; Damien Subit
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2014-08-08

2.  Chest deflection tolerance to blunt anterior loading is sensitive to age but not load distribution.

Authors:  Richard Kent; Jim Patrie
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Regional variation in the structural response and geometrical properties of human ribs.

Authors:  Joseph M Cormier; Joel D Stitzel; Stefan M Duma; Fumio Matsuoka
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2005

4.  The effect of age on the structural properties of human ribs.

Authors:  Amanda M Agnew; Michelle Schafman; Kevin Moorhouse; Susan E White; Yun-Seok Kang
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2014-09-16

5.  Mapping the natural variation in whole bone stiffness and strength across skeletal sites.

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Erin M R Bigelow; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Intracortical remodeling parameters are associated with measures of bone robustness.

Authors:  Haviva M Goldman; Naomi A Hampson; J Jared Guth; David Lin; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  Morbidity from rib fractures increases after age 45.

Authors:  John B Holcomb; Neil R McMullin; Rosemary A Kozar; Marjorie H Lygas; Frederick A Moore
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Variation in tibial functionality and fracture susceptibility among healthy, young adults arises from the acquisition of biologically distinct sets of traits.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Rachel Evans; Charles H Negus; Joel J Gagnier; Amanda Centi; Tomer Erlich; Amir Hadid; Ran Yanovich; Daniel S Moran
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Functional integration of skeletal traits: an intraskeletal assessment of bone size, mineralization, and volume covariance.

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Age and sex alone are insufficient to predict human rib structural response to dynamic A-P loading.

Authors:  Michelle A Schafman; Yun-Seok Kang; Kevin Moorhouse; Susan E White; John H Bolte; Amanda M Agnew
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparing rib cortical thickness measurements from computed tomography (CT) and Micro-CT.

Authors:  Zachary S Hostetler; Joel D Stitzel; Ashley A Weaver
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Experimental study exploring the factors that promote rib fragility in the elderly.

Authors:  Christian Liebsch; Shamila Hübner; Marco Palanca; Luca Cristofolini; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.