Literature DB >> 15749351

Chest deflection tolerance to blunt anterior loading is sensitive to age but not load distribution.

Richard Kent1, Jim Patrie.   

Abstract

Ninety-three human cadaver tests are used in the development of thoracic injury risk functions with consideration of age and restraint condition. Linear logistic regression models are developed with the set of potential predictors including the maximum chest deflection, the age of the cadaver at death, gender, and the loading condition on the anterior thorax: blunt hub (41 tests), seat belt (26 tests), air bag (12 tests), and combined belt-and-bag (14 tests). Predicted outcomes were the probability of any rib fractures (onset of injury) and the probability of greater than six rib fractures (severe injury). The analysis shows that the injury risk function was not dependent on the loading condition, but was strongly dependent on age. A significant injury risk model with good ability to discriminate injury from non-injury tests (P < 0.0001, chi-square = 21.49, area under receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) = 0.867, Kruskal's Gamma = 0.732) is presented using only maximum chest deflection and cadaver age as predictors of injury risk. The 50% risk of any rib fractures is found to occur at 35% chest deflection for a 30-year-old, but at 13% deflection for a 70-year-old. The 50% risk of severe injury is shown to occur at 33% chest deflection for a 70-year-old, but at 43% for a 30-year-old.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15749351     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  6 in total

1.  Response of the human torso to lateral and oblique constant-velocity impacts.

Authors:  Damien Subit; Sonia Duprey; Sabrina Lau; Herve Guillemot; David Lessley; Richard Kent
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2010

2.  How many people are injured and killed as a result of aging? Frailty, fragility, and the elderly risk-exposure tradeoff assessed via a risk saturation model.

Authors:  Richard Kent; Matthew Trowbridge; Francisco J Lopez-Valdes; Rafael Heredero Ordoyo; Maria Segui-Gomez
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2009-10

3.  Rib Geometry Explains Variation in Dynamic Structural Response: Potential Implications for Frontal Impact Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Michelle M Murach; Yun-Seok Kang; Samuel D Goldman; Michelle A Schafman; Stephen H Schlecht; Kevin Moorhouse; John H Bolte; Amanda M Agnew
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Fatality risk and the presence of rib fractures.

Authors:  Richard Kent; William Woods; Ola Bostrom
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2008-10

5.  Fatal blunt chest trauma: an evaluation of rib fracture patterns and age.

Authors:  Siobhan O'Donovan; Corinna van den Heuvel; Matthew Baldock; Melissa A Humphries; Roger W Byard
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.791

6.  Rib fracture displacement worsens over time.

Authors:  Zachary Mitchel Bauman; Benjamin Grams; Ujwal Yanala; Valerie Shostrom; Brett Waibel; Charity Hassie Evans; Samuel Cemaj; Lisa Lynn Schlitzkus
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.693

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.