Literature DB >> 28547558

Megaherbivores influence trophic guilds structure in African ungulate communities.

Hervé Fritz1, Patrick Duncan2, Iain J Gordon3, Andrew W Illius4.   

Abstract

We used a data set of ungulate censuses from 31 natural ecosystems from East and Southern Africa to test two hypotheses: (1) megaherbivores should dominate ungulate communities in ecosystems with high rainfall and low soil nutrient status because of their ability to survive on poor quality food resources, and (2) the abundance of megaherbivores affects the abundance of the mesoherbivores, distinguishing the different feeding guilds: mesograzers, mesobrowsers and mesomixed feeders. Two axes of a multivariate analysis (77% of the variance) discriminated the sites well, the first separating sites dominated by megaherbivores from those dominated by mesoherbivores, and the second representing a gradient between mesograzers and mesobrowsers. Our analysis shows (1) that megaherbivores can be considered to be a separate trophic guild and (2) that mesograzers and mesobrowsers respond differently to variation in their trophic environments. The metabolic biomass density of megaherbivores increased with annual rainfall, but was not related to soil nutrient status, and as predicted, megaherbivores comprised a larger proportion of the biomass of ungulate communities in ecosystems with high rainfall and low nutrient soils. The metabolic biomass density of mesoherbivores increased with rainfall and soil nutrient status. Within the mesoherbivores, the metabolic biomass density of mesograzers showed the same trend, and seemed unaffected by megaherbivores. Conversely, mesobrowsers and mesomixed feeders appeared to be unaffected by rainfall or soil nutrient status, but mesomixed feeders declined when megaherbivores were abundant. This suggests that megaherbivores may compete with the mesomixed-feeder species for food or they may alter the vegetation communities unfavourably. A similar analysis using elephants alone instead of megaherbivores as a group showed that both mesobrowsers and mesomixed feeders were affected significantly by elephant, which is consistent with the fact that most of the effect of megaherbivores on browse resources or woodland habitat is due to elephants. This study shows that the different trophic guilds within African ungulate communities react differently to environmental factors (rain and soil), and that megaherbivores, and particularly elephants, appear to compete with mesomixed feeders and mesobrowsers. These results are relevant for the understanding of the functioning of African ungulate communities and call for further testing with longitudinal data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Browsers; Grazers; Herbivory; Mesoherbivores; Savannas

Year:  2002        PMID: 28547558     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-0919-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  22 in total

1.  The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters.

Authors:  M Clauss; R Frey; B Kiefer; M Lechner-Doll; W Loehlein; C Polster; G E Rössner; W J Streich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  How could sympatric megaherbivores coexist? Example of niche partitioning within a proboscidean community from the Miocene of Europe.

Authors:  Ivan Calandra; Ursula B Göhlich; Gildas Merceron
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-06-10

3.  The biomechanics of foraging determines face length among kangaroos and their relatives.

Authors:  D Rex Mitchell; Emma Sherratt; Justin A Ledogar; Stephen Wroe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sheep grazing and rodent populations: evidence of negative interactions from a landscape scale experiment.

Authors:  Harald Steen; Atle Mysterud; Gunnar Austrheim
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  An overview of nitrogen cycling in a semiarid savanna: some implications for management and conservation in a large African park.

Authors:  Corli Coetsee; Shayne Jacobs; Navashni Govender
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  The spatial distribution of African savannah herbivores: species associations and habitat occupancy in a landscape context.

Authors:  T Michael Anderson; Staci White; Bryant Davis; Rob Erhardt; Meredith Palmer; Alexandra Swanson; Margaret Kosmala; Craig Packer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  The anomalous Kentucky coffeetree: megafaunal fruit sinking to extinction?

Authors:  David N Zaya; Henry F Howe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The effects of herbivory by a mega- and mesoherbivore on tree recruitment in sand forest, South Africa.

Authors:  D D Georgette Lagendijk; Robin L Mackey; Bruce R Page; Rob Slotow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Quantity and configuration of available elephant habitat and related conservation concerns in the Lower Kinabatangan floodplain of Sabah, Malaysia.

Authors:  Jason G Estes; Nurzhafarina Othman; Sulaiman Ismail; Marc Ancrenaz; Benoit Goossens; Laurentius N Ambu; Anna B Estes; Peter A Palmiotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Shift in black rhinoceros diet in the presence of elephant: evidence for competition?

Authors:  Marietjie Landman; David S Schoeman; Graham I H Kerley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.