Literature DB >> 28547506

The benefits of clustering eggs: the role of egg predation and larval cannibalism in a predatory mite.

Farid Faraji1, Arne Janssen2, Maurice W Sabelis1.   

Abstract

Many arthropods produce clusters of eggs, but an unambiguous explanation for the evolution of egg clustering is still lacking. We test several hypotheses for the production of egg clusters by the predatory mite Iphiseius degenerans. This predator feeds on pollen, thrips larvae and nectar in flowers, but oviposits in clusters in tufts of leaf hairs (acarodomatia), where eggs run a lower risk of being killed by thrips, the prey of this predatory mite. The observed clustering is not caused by a shortage of oviposition sites; females preferably oviposit in a domatium containing eggs rather than in an empty domatium. To explain this preference, we first examined the effect of egg clusters on the risk of cannibalism. We found that eggs are invulnerable to cannibalism, whereas larvae emerging from single eggs or from clusters were equally vulnerable. Subsequently, we considered the killing of eggs resulting from counter-attacks by prey, i.e. the western flower thrips. We found no indication that a cluster of eggs protects eggs from predation by thrips. However, when eggs were clustered in a domatium rather than scattered over domatia, the proportion of eggs killed by thrips was lower. Hence, oviposition in clusters has no effect on its own and oviposition in domatia reduces predation risk by thrips, but oviposition in clusters in domatia leads to a synergistic effect on the survival of predator eggs. This synergism probably arises because eggs in clusters within tufts of leaf hairs are more difficult for thrips to reach. These experiments highlight a novel explanation of egg clustering, i.e. adaptation to counter-attacking prey. Moreover, they show that plant domatia protect predator eggs from predation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cannibalism; Counter-attacking prey; Domatia; Egg clustering; Predation

Year:  2002        PMID: 28547506     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-001-0846-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Leaf domatia mediate mutualism between mites and a tropical tree.

Authors:  Gustavo Q Romero; Woodruff W Benson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Generalist red velvet mite predator (Balaustium sp.) performs better on a mixed diet.

Authors:  Karen Muñoz-Cárdenas; Luz Stella Fuentes; R Fernando Cantor; C Daniel Rodríguez; Arne Janssen; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 3.  Classifying life-style types of phytoseiid mites: diagnostic traits.

Authors:  B A Crofti; J S Blackwood; J A McMurtry
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Selective oviposition of the mayfly Baetis bicaudatus.

Authors:  Andrea C Encalada; Barbara L Peckarsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Distribution and oviposition site selection by predatory mites in the presence of intraguild predators.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Choh; Maurice W Sabelis; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction.

Authors:  Tessa van der Hammen; Marta Montserrat; Maurice W Sabelis; André M de Roos; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Predatory mites avoid ovipositing near counterattacking prey.

Authors:  F Faraji; A Janssen; M W Sabelis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.132

8.  Influence of leaf trichomes on predatory mite (Typhlodromus pyri) abundance in grape varieties.

Authors:  R Loughner; K Goldman; G Loeb; J Nyrop
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 9.  Cannibalism among phytoseiid mites: a review.

Authors:  Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Predatory interactions between prey affect patch selection by predators.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Choh; Maurice W Sabelis; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.