Literature DB >> 22081260

Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction.

Tessa van der Hammen1, Marta Montserrat, Maurice W Sabelis, André M de Roos, Arne Janssen.   

Abstract

Ideal free distribution (IFD) models predict that animals distribute themselves such that no individual can increase its fitness by moving to another patch. Many empirical tests assume that the interference among animals is independent of density and do not quantify the effects of density on fitness traits. Using two species of predatory mites, we measured oviposition as a function of conspecific density. Subsequently, we used these functions to calculate expected distributions on two connected patches. We performed an experimental test of the distributions of mites on two such connected patches, among which one had a food accessibility rate that was twice as high as on the other. For one of the two species, Iphiseius degenerans, the distribution matched the expected distribution. The distribution also coincided with the ratio of food accessibility. The other species, Neoseiulus cucumeris, distributed itself differently than expected. However, the oviposition rates of both species did not differ significantly from the expected oviposition rates based on experiments on single patches. This suggests that the oviposition rate of N. cucumeris was not negatively affected by the observed distribution, despite the fact that N. cucumeris did not match the predicted distributions. Thus, the distribution of one mite species, I. degenerans, was in agreement with IFD theory, whereas for the other mite species, N. cucumeris, unknown factors may have influenced the distribution of the mites. We conclude that density-dependent fitness traits provide essential information for explaining animal distributions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22081260      PMCID: PMC3326238          DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2190-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations.

Authors:  A Kacelnik; J R Krebs; C Bernstein
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  The benefits of clustering eggs: the role of egg predation and larval cannibalism in a predatory mite.

Authors:  Farid Faraji; Arne Janssen; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The intensity of interference varies with food density: support for behaviour-based models of interference.

Authors:  Anthony L Moody; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Choh; Tessa van der Hammen; Maurice W Sabelis; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Can settlement in natal-like habitat explain maladaptive habitat selection?

Authors:  Walter H Piper; Michael W Palmer; Nathan Banfield; Michael W Meyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Distribution and oviposition site selection by predatory mites in the presence of intraguild predators.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Choh; Maurice W Sabelis; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.132

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.