Literature DB >> 28547196

Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects.

Whendee L Silver1, Ryan K Miya1.   

Abstract

Root decomposition represents a significant C flux in terrestrial ecosystems. Roots are exposed to a different decomposition environment than aboveground tissues, and few general principles exist regarding the factors controlling rates of root decay. We use a global dataset to explore the relative importance of climate, environmental variables, and litter quality in regulating rates of root decomposition. The parameters that explained the largest amount of variability in root decay were root Ca concentrations and C:N ratios, with a smaller proportion explained by latitude, mean annual temperature, mean annual precipitation, and actual evapotranspiration (AET). Root chemistry and decay rates varied by plant life form (conifer, broadleaf, or graminoid). Conifer roots had the lowest levels of Ca and N, the highest C:N and lignin:N ratios, and decomposed at the slowest rates. In a stepwise multiple linear regression, AET, root Ca, and C:N ratio accounted for approximately 90% of the variability in root decay rates. Root chemistry appeared to be the primary controller of root decomposition, while climate and environmental factors played secondary roles, in contrast to previously established leaf litter decomposition models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Actual evapotranspiration; Calcium; Carbon:nitrogen ratio; Q 10; Root decay

Year:  2001        PMID: 28547196     DOI: 10.1007/s004420100740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  50 in total

Review 1.  Merging aquatic and terrestrial perspectives of nutrient biogeochemistry.

Authors:  Nancy B Grimm; Sarah E Gergel; William H McDowell; Elizabeth W Boyer; C Lisa Dent; Peter Groffman; Stephen C Hart; Judson Harvey; Carol Johnston; Emilio Mayorga; Michael E McClain; Gilles Pinay
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-09-23       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Plant traits and decomposition: are the relationships for roots comparable to those for leaves?

Authors:  Marine Birouste; Elena Kazakou; Alain Blanchard; Catherine Roumet
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Fine root decay rates vary widely among lowland tropical tree species.

Authors:  James W Raich; Ann E Russell; Oscar Valverde-Barrantes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Stoichiometry of ferns in Hawaii: implications for nutrient cycling.

Authors:  Kathryn L Amatangelo; Peter M Vitousek
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The sensitivity of soil microbial respiration declined due to crop straw addition but did not depend on the type of crop straw.

Authors:  Shutao Chen; Jing Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Short sampling intervals reveal very rapid root turnover in a temperate grassland.

Authors:  Anna M Stewart; Douglas A Frank
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Fine root decomposition rates do not mirror those of leaf litter among temperate tree species.

Authors:  Sarah E Hobbie; Jacek Oleksyn; David M Eissenstat; Peter B Reich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Control of climate and litter quality on leaf litter decomposition in different climatic zones.

Authors:  Xinyue Zhang; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Nitrogen dynamics differed among the first six root branch orders of Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii during short-term decomposition.

Authors:  Pingping Fan; Youxu Jiang
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Do soil bacterial communities respond differently to abrupt or gradual additions of copper?

Authors:  Michael McTee; Lorinda Bullington; Matthias C Rillig; Philip W Ramsey
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.194

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.