BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fine root decomposition is an important determinant of nutrient and carbon cycling in grasslands; however, little is known about the factors controlling root decomposition among species. Our aim was to investigate whether interspecific variation in the potential decomposition rate of fine roots could be accounted for by root chemical and morphological traits, life history and taxonomic affiliation. We also investigated the co-ordinated variation in root and leaf traits and potential decomposition rates. METHODS: We analysed potential decomposition rates and the chemical and morphological traits of fine roots on 18 Mediterranean herbaceous species grown in controlled conditions. The results were compared with those obtained for leaves in a previous study conducted on similar species. KEY RESULTS: Differences in the potential decomposition rates of fine roots between species were accounted for by root chemical composition, but not by morphological traits. The root potential decomposition rate varied with taxonomy, but not with life history. Poaceae, with high cellulose concentration and low concentrations of soluble compounds and phosphorus, decomposed more slowly than Asteraceae and Fabaceae. Patterns of root traits, including decomposition rate, mirrored those of leaf traits, resulting in a similar species clustering. CONCLUSIONS: The highly co-ordinated variation of roots and leaves in terms of traits and potential decomposition rate suggests that changes in the functional composition of communities in response to anthropogenic changes will strongly affect biogeochemical cycles at the ecosystem level.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fine root decomposition is an important determinant of nutrient and carbon cycling in grasslands; however, little is known about the factors controlling root decomposition among species. Our aim was to investigate whether interspecific variation in the potential decomposition rate of fine roots could be accounted for by root chemical and morphological traits, life history and taxonomic affiliation. We also investigated the co-ordinated variation in root and leaf traits and potential decomposition rates. METHODS: We analysed potential decomposition rates and the chemical and morphological traits of fine roots on 18 Mediterranean herbaceous species grown in controlled conditions. The results were compared with those obtained for leaves in a previous study conducted on similar species. KEY RESULTS: Differences in the potential decomposition rates of fine roots between species were accounted for by root chemical composition, but not by morphological traits. The root potential decomposition rate varied with taxonomy, but not with life history. Poaceae, with high cellulose concentration and low concentrations of soluble compounds and phosphorus, decomposed more slowly than Asteraceae and Fabaceae. Patterns of root traits, including decomposition rate, mirrored those of leaf traits, resulting in a similar species clustering. CONCLUSIONS: The highly co-ordinated variation of roots and leaves in terms of traits and potential decomposition rate suggests that changes in the functional composition of communities in response to anthropogenic changes will strongly affect biogeochemical cycles at the ecosystem level.
Authors: David A Wardle; Richard D Bardgett; John N Klironomos; Heikki Setälä; Wim H van der Putten; Diana H Wall Journal: Science Date: 2004-06-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: William K Cornwell; Johannes H C Cornelissen; Kathryn Amatangelo; Ellen Dorrepaal; Valerie T Eviner; Oscar Godoy; Sarah E Hobbie; Bart Hoorens; Hiroko Kurokawa; Natalia Pérez-Harguindeguy; Helen M Quested; Louis S Santiago; David A Wardle; Ian J Wright; Rien Aerts; Steven D Allison; Peter van Bodegom; Victor Brovkin; Alex Chatain; Terry V Callaghan; Sandra Díaz; Eric Garnier; Diego E Gurvich; Elena Kazakou; Julia A Klein; Jenny Read; Peter B Reich; Nadejda A Soudzilovskaia; M Victoria Vaieretti; Mark Westoby Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2008-07-08 Impact factor: 9.492
Authors: Peter B Reich; Mark G Tjoelker; Kurt S Pregitzer; Ian J Wright; Jacek Oleksyn; Jose-Luis Machado Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 9.492
Authors: N Legay; C Baxendale; K Grigulis; U Krainer; E Kastl; M Schloter; R D Bardgett; C Arnoldi; M Bahn; M Dumont; F Poly; T Pommier; J C Clément; S Lavorel Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Hongmei Chen; Natalie J Oram; Kathryn E Barry; Liesje Mommer; Jasper van Ruijven; Hans de Kroon; Anne Ebeling; Nico Eisenhauer; Christine Fischer; Gerd Gleixner; Arthur Gessler; Odette González Macé; Nina Hacker; Anke Hildebrandt; Markus Lange; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Stefan Scheu; Yvonne Oelmann; Cameron Wagg; Wolfgang Wilcke; Christian Wirth; Alexandra Weigelt Journal: Oecologia Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Iris Bumb; Eric Garnier; Sylvain Coq; Johanne Nahmani; Maria Del Rey Granado; Olivier Gimenez; Elena Kazakou Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Fabrice Grassein; Servane Lemauviel-Lavenant; Sandra Lavorel; Michael Bahn; Richard D Bardgett; Marie Desclos-Theveniau; Philippe Laîné Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Grégoire T Freschet; Loïc Pagès; Colleen M Iversen; Louise H Comas; Boris Rewald; Catherine Roumet; Jitka Klimešová; Marcin Zadworny; Hendrik Poorter; Johannes A Postma; Thomas S Adams; Agnieszka Bagniewska-Zadworna; A Glyn Bengough; Elison B Blancaflor; Ivano Brunner; Johannes H C Cornelissen; Eric Garnier; Arthur Gessler; Sarah E Hobbie; Ina C Meier; Liesje Mommer; Catherine Picon-Cochard; Laura Rose; Peter Ryser; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Nadejda A Soudzilovskaia; Alexia Stokes; Tao Sun; Oscar J Valverde-Barrantes; Monique Weemstra; Alexandra Weigelt; Nina Wurzburger; Larry M York; Sarah A Batterman; Moemy Gomes de Moraes; Štěpán Janeček; Hans Lambers; Verity Salmon; Nishanth Tharayil; M Luke McCormack Journal: New Phytol Date: 2021-11 Impact factor: 10.323
Authors: Tao Sun; Sarah E Hobbie; Björn Berg; Hongguang Zhang; Qingkui Wang; Zhengwen Wang; Stephan Hättenschwiler Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 11.205