Literature DB >> 28547186

Differences in selective reticulo-ruminal particle retention as a key factor in ruminant diversification.

Marcus Clauss1, Matthias Lechner-Doll2.   

Abstract

The measurement of passage rate is important for the concept of ruminant diversification. While supporters of Hofmann's 1989 feeding type classification claim that browsing ruminants have faster passage rates than grazing ruminants, other researchers consider the passage rate to depend on body size alone. To date, no convincing comparison of ruminant passage rates has been put forward. For comparative purposes, we suggest the use of the "selectivity factor", which is an expression of how much longer particles of a defined size (<2 mm) are retained in the ruminant digestive tract than fluids. From the limited data available, it seems that grazing ruminants display selectivity factors between 1.56 and 3.80, whereas browsers have a much narrower range of 1.14-1.80. This suggests that browsers are not able to selectively retain particles as long as grazers. Intake of browsers, on the other hand, may not be limited by physical fill of the forestomach to the same degree as in grazers. This result can explain several observations on the digestive physiology of browsers, some of which have been linked to a rumen bypass mechanism. We propose that the ability for selective particle retention is a key factor for understanding the physiological consequences of ruminant diversification.

Keywords:  Browser-grazer dichotomy; Forestomach physiology; Passage rate; Rumen bypass; Selectivity factor

Year:  2001        PMID: 28547186     DOI: 10.1007/s004420100735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters.

Authors:  M Clauss; R Frey; B Kiefer; M Lechner-Doll; W Loehlein; C Polster; G E Rössner; W J Streich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Digesta retention patterns of solute and different-sized particles in camelids compared with ruminants and other foregut fermenters.

Authors:  Marie T Dittmann; Ullrich Runge; Sylvia Ortmann; Richard A Lang; Dario Moser; Cordula Galeffi; Angela Schwarm; Michael Kreuzer; Marcus Clauss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Stable isotope labeled n-alkanes to assess digesta passage kinetics through the digestive tract of ruminants.

Authors:  Daniel Warner; Luis M M Ferreira; Michel J H Breuer; Jan Dijkstra; Wilbert F Pellikaan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of roughage quality, period of day and time lapse after meal termination on rumen digesta load in goats and sheep.

Authors:  Mehluli Moyo; Rasheed Adekunle Adebayo; Ignatius Verla Nsahlai
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  A Comparative Study on Microbiological and Chemical Characteristics of Small Ruminant Carcasses from Abattoirs in Greece.

Authors:  Anestis Tsitsos; Vangelis Economou; Eirini Chouliara; Ioannis Ambrosiadis; Georgios Arsenos
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-07

6.  An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods.

Authors:  Sophie J Krizsan; Alejandro Mateos-Rivera; Stefan Bertilsson; Annika Felton; Anne Anttila; Mohammad Ramin; Merko Vaga; Helena Gidlund; Pekka Huhtanen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Effects of supplementation of Brachiaria brizantha cv. Piatá and Napier grass with Desmodium distortum on feed intake, digesta kinetics and milk production in crossbred dairy cows.

Authors:  Mupenzi Mutimura; Cyprian Ebong; Idupulapati M Rao; Ignatius V Nsahlai
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2018-02-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.