Literature DB >> 28547108

Consumption choice by bears feeding on salmon.

S M Gende1, T P Quinn2, M F Willson3.   

Abstract

Consumption choice by brown (Ursus arctos) and black bears (U. americanus) feeding on salmon was recorded for over 20,000 bear-killed fish from 1994 to 1999 in Bristol Bay (sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka) and southeastern Alaska (pink, O. gorbuscha and chum salmon O. keta). These data revealed striking patterns of partial and selective consumption that varied with relative availability and attributes of the fish. As the availability of salmon decreased, bears consumed a larger proportion of each fish among both years and habitats. When availability was high (absolute number and density of salmon), bears consumed less biomass per captured fish, targeting energy-rich fish (those that had not spawned) or energy-rich body parts (eggs in females; brain in males). In contrast, individual fish were consumed to a much greater extent, regardless of sex or spawning status, in habitats or years of low salmon availability. The proportion of biomass consumed per fish was similar for males and females, when spawning status was statistically controlled, but bears targeted different body parts: the body flesh, brain and dorsal hump in males and the roe in females. Bears thus appeared to maximize energy intake by modifying the amount and body parts consumed, based on availability and attributes of spawning salmon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brown bears; Foraging behavior; Oncorhynchus; Salmon; Ursus

Year:  2001        PMID: 28547108     DOI: 10.1007/s004420000590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  18 in total

1.  Effects of habitat features on size-biased predation on salmon by bears.

Authors:  Luke C Andersson; John D Reynolds
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Diverse foraging opportunities drive the functional response of local and landscape-scale bear predation on Pacific salmon.

Authors:  Thomas P Quinn; Curry J Cunningham; Aaron J Wirsing
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Phenological synchronization disrupts trophic interactions between Kodiak brown bears and salmon.

Authors:  William W Deacy; Jonathan B Armstrong; William B Leacock; Charles T Robbins; David D Gustine; Eric J Ward; Joy A Erlenbach; Jack A Stanford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Summer/fall diet and macronutrient assimilation in an Arctic predator.

Authors:  C A Stricker; K D Rode; B D Taras; J F Bromaghin; L Horstmann; L Quakenbush
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Males make poor meals: a comparison of nutrient extraction during sexual cannibalism and predation.

Authors:  Shawn M Wilder; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Does lipid-correction introduce biases into isotopic mixing models? Implications for diet reconstruction studies.

Authors:  Martin C Arostegui; Daniel E Schindler; Gordon W Holtgrieve
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Macronutrient optimization and seasonal diet mixing in a large omnivore, the grizzly bear: a geometric analysis.

Authors:  Sean C P Coogan; David Raubenheimer; Gordon B Stenhouse; Scott E Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Spawning salmon disrupt trophic coupling between wolves and ungulate prey in coastal British Columbia.

Authors:  Chris T Darimont; Paul C Paquet; Thomas E Reimchen
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 2.964

9.  Jellyfish as prey: frequency of predation and selective foraging of Boops boops (Vertebrata, Actinopterygii) on the mauve stinger Pelagia noctiluca (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa).

Authors:  Giacomo Milisenda; Sara Rosa; Veronica L Fuentes; Ferdinando Boero; Letterio Guglielmo; Jennifer E Purcell; Stefano Piraino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Within-colony feeding selectivity by a corallivorous reef fish: foraging to maximize reward?

Authors:  Rohan M Brooker; Geoffrey P Jones; Philip L Munday
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.