Gabriel Willmann1,2, Antonio Brunno Nepomuceno3, Katharina Messias3, Leticia Barroso3, Ingrid U Scott4, André Messias3, Rodrigo Jorge3. 1. Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany. 2. Eye Hospital, Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart 71074, Germany. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, SP, Brazil. 4. Departments of Ophthalmology and Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey 17033, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
AIM: To report foveal thickness reduction in eyes with resolution of macular edema and recovery of a foveal depression after one-year of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Foveal thickness was assessed with optical coherence tomography to determine the central subfield foveal thickness (CSFT) and macular volume in 42 eyes with DME (CSFT>275 µm). Evaluations also included measurement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and were performed at baseline, and upon foveal depression recovery achieved after 12 monthly intravitreal injections of either 1.5 mg/0.06 mL bevacizumab (n=21) or 0.5 mg/0.05 mL ranibizumab (n=21). Data was compared to 42 eyes of normally sighted, non-diabetic, healthy individuals with similar age, gender and race distributions. RESULTS: Mean baseline BCVA was 0.59±0.04 and 0.32± 0.03 logMAR (P<0.001) after treatment and resolution of DME, with all, but 3 eyes, showing BCVA improvement. Mean CSFT before treatment was 422.0±20.0 µm, and after treatment, decreased to 241.6±4.6 µm (P<0.001), which is significantly thinner than CSFT found in control subjects (272.0±3.4 µm; P<0.001). Moreover, in 33/42 DM eyes (79%), CSTF was thinner than the matched control eye. Macular volume showed comparable results, but with lower differences between groups (control: 8.5±0.4 mm3; DME: 8.2±1.0 mm3; P=0.0267). CONCLUSION: DME eyes show significantly lower foveal thickness than matched controls after DME resolution achieved with one-year anti-VEGF therapy. Further investigation into the reasonsfor this presumable retinal atrophy using fluorescein angiography and functional parameters as well as establishing possible predictors is warranted. This finding should be considered during the treatment of DME.
AIM: To report foveal thickness reduction in eyes with resolution of macular edema and recovery of a foveal depression after one-year of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Foveal thickness was assessed with optical coherence tomography to determine the central subfield foveal thickness (CSFT) and macular volume in 42 eyes with DME (CSFT>275 µm). Evaluations also included measurement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and were performed at baseline, and upon foveal depression recovery achieved after 12 monthly intravitreal injections of either 1.5 mg/0.06 mL bevacizumab (n=21) or 0.5 mg/0.05 mL ranibizumab (n=21). Data was compared to 42 eyes of normally sighted, non-diabetic, healthy individuals with similar age, gender and race distributions. RESULTS: Mean baseline BCVA was 0.59±0.04 and 0.32± 0.03 logMAR (P<0.001) after treatment and resolution of DME, with all, but 3 eyes, showing BCVA improvement. Mean CSFT before treatment was 422.0±20.0 µm, and after treatment, decreased to 241.6±4.6 µm (P<0.001), which is significantly thinner than CSFT found in control subjects (272.0±3.4 µm; P<0.001). Moreover, in 33/42 DM eyes (79%), CSTF was thinner than the matched control eye. Macular volume showed comparable results, but with lower differences between groups (control: 8.5±0.4 mm3; DME: 8.2±1.0 mm3; P=0.0267). CONCLUSION:DME eyes show significantly lower foveal thickness than matched controls after DME resolution achieved with one-year anti-VEGF therapy. Further investigation into the reasonsfor this presumable retinal atrophy using fluorescein angiography and functional parameters as well as establishing possible predictors is warranted. This finding should be considered during the treatment of DME.
Authors: Tito Fiore; Sofia Androudi; Barbara Iaccheri; Marco Lupidi; Fabrizio Giansanti; Giansanti Fabrizio; Daniela Fruttini; Laura Biondi; Carlo Cagini Journal: Curr Eye Res Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 2.424
Authors: Quan Dong Nguyen; David M Brown; Dennis M Marcus; David S Boyer; Sunil Patel; Leonard Feiner; Andrea Gibson; Judy Sy; Amy Chen Rundle; J Jill Hopkins; Roman G Rubio; Jason S Ehrlich Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-02-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Lloyd Paul Aiello; Allison R Edwards; Roy W Beck; Neil M Bressler; Matthew D Davis; Frederick Ferris; Adam R Glassman; Michael S Ip; Kellee M Miller Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Serge Resnikoff; Donatella Pascolini; Daniel Etya'ale; Ivo Kocur; Ramachandra Pararajasegaram; Gopal P Pokharel; Silvio P Mariotti Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2004-12-14 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Murilo W Rodrigues; José A Cardillo; André Messias; Rubens C Siqueira; Ingrid U Scott; Rodrigo Jorge Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 3.117