Marie Bieth1,2, Markus Krönke1, Robert Tauber3, Marielena Dahlbender3, Margitta Retz3, Stephan G Nekolla1, Bjoern Menze2, Tobias Maurer3, Matthias Eiber4,5, Markus Schwaiger1. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 2. Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 3. Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany matthias.eiber@tum.de. 5. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
PET combined with CT and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands has gained significant interest for staging prostate cancer (PC). In this study, we propose 2 multimodal quantitative indices as imaging biomarkers for the assessment of osseous tumor burden using 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and present preliminary clinical data. Methods: We defined 2 bone PET indices (BPIs) that incorporate anatomic information from CT and functional information from 68Ga-PSMA PET: BPIVOL is the percentage of bone volume affected by tumor and BPISUV additionally considers the level of PSMA expression. We describe a semiautomatic computation method based on segmentation of bones in CT and of lesions in PET. Data from 45 patients with castration-resistant PC and bone metastases during 223Ra-dichloride were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated the computational stability and reproducibility of the proposed indices and explored their relation to the prostate-specific antigen blood value, the bone scan index (BSI), and disease classification using PERCIST. Results: On the technical side, BPIVOL and BPISUV showed an interobserver maximum difference of 3.5%, and their computation took only a few minutes. On the clinical side, BPIVOL and BPISUV showed significant correlations with BSI (r = 0.76 and 0.74, respectively, P < 0.001) and prostate-specific antigen values (r = 0.57 and 0.54, respectively, P < 0.01). When the proposed indices were compared against expert rating using PERCIST, BPIVOL and BPISUV showed better agreement than BSI, indicating their potential for objective response evaluation. Conclusion: We propose the evaluation of BPIVOL and BPISUV as imaging biomarkers for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in a prospective study exploring their potential for outcome prediction in patients with bone metastases from PC.
PET combined with CT and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands has gained significant interest for staging prostate cancer (PC). In this study, we propose 2 multimodal quantitative indices as imaging biomarkers for the assessment of osseous tumor burden using 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and present preliminary clinical data. Methods: We defined 2 bone PET indices (BPIs) that incorporate anatomic information from CT and functional information from 68Ga-PSMA PET: BPIVOL is the percentage of bone volume affected by tumor and BPISUV additionally considers the level of PSMA expression. We describe a semiautomatic computation method based on segmentation of bones in CT and of lesions in PET. Data from 45 patients with castration-resistant PC and bone metastases during 223Ra-dichloride were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated the computational stability and reproducibility of the proposed indices and explored their relation to the prostate-specific antigen blood value, the bone scan index (BSI), and disease classification using PERCIST. Results: On the technical side, BPIVOL and BPISUV showed an interobserver maximum difference of 3.5%, and their computation took only a few minutes. On the clinical side, BPIVOL and BPISUV showed significant correlations with BSI (r = 0.76 and 0.74, respectively, P < 0.001) and prostate-specific antigen values (r = 0.57 and 0.54, respectively, P < 0.01). When the proposed indices were compared against expert rating using PERCIST, BPIVOL and BPISUV showed better agreement than BSI, indicating their potential for objective response evaluation. Conclusion: We propose the evaluation of BPIVOL and BPISUV as imaging biomarkers for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in a prospective study exploring their potential for outcome prediction in patients with bone metastases from PC.
Authors: Andrei Gafita; Marie Bieth; Markus Krönke; Giles Tetteh; Fernando Navarro; Hui Wang; Elisabeth Günther; Bjoern Menze; Wolfgang A Weber; Matthias Eiber Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christian Daniel Fankhauser; Cédric Poyet; Stephanie G C Kroeze; Benedikt Kranzbühler; Helena I Garcia Schüler; Matthias Guckenberger; Philipp A Kaufmann; Thomas Hermanns; Irene A Burger Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Lena Thomas; Caroline Balmus; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Markus Essler; Holger Strunk; Ralph A Bundschuh Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2017-07-31
Authors: Francesco Fiz; Helmut Dittman; Cristina Campi; Silvia Morbelli; Cecilia Marini; Massimo Brignone; Matteo Bauckneht; Roberta Piva; Anna Maria Massone; Michele Piana; Gianmario Sambuceti; Christian la Fougère Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Date: 2018-07-28
Authors: Lena M Mittlmeier; Matthias Brendel; Leonie Beyer; Nathalie L Albert; Andrei Todica; Mathias J Zacherl; Vera Wenter; Annika Herlemann; Alexander Kretschmer; Stephan T Ledderose; Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann; Wolfgang G Kunz; Jens Ricke; Peter Bartenstein; Harun Ilhan; Marcus Unterrainer Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Felipe de Galiza Barbosa; Marcelo Araújo Queiroz; Rafael Fernandes Nunes; José Flávio Gomes Marin; Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel; Giovanni Guido Cerri Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 2.365