Literature DB >> 28546055

The long way of implementing patient-centered care and shared decision making in Germany.

Martin Härter1, Jörg Dirmaier2, Isabelle Scholl3, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff4, Marie-Luise Dierks5, Wolfgang Eich6, Hardy Müller7, David Klemperer8, Klaus Koch9, Christiane Bieber6.   

Abstract

The main focus of the paper is on the description of the development and current state of research and implementation of patient-centered care (PCC) and shared decision making (SDM) after fifteen years of substantial advances in health policy and health services research. What is the current state of SDM in health policy? The "Patients' Rights Act" from 2013 standardizes all rights and responsibilities within the framework of medical treatment for German citizens and legal residents. This comprises the right to informed decisions, comprehensive and comprehensible information for patients, and decisions based on a clinician-patient-partnership. What is the current state of SDM interventions and patient decision support tools? SDM training programs for healthcare professionals have been developed. Their implementation in medical schools has been successful. Several decision support tools - primarily with support from health insurance funds and other public agencies - are to be implemented in routine care, specifically for national cancer screening programs. What is the current state of research and routine implementation? The German government and other public institutions are constantly funding research programs in which patient-centered care and shared decision-making are important topics. The development and implementation of decision tools for patients and professionals as well as the implementation of CME trainings for healthcare professionals require future efforts. What does the future look like? With the support of health policy and scientific evidence, transfer of PCC and SDM to practice is regarded as meaningful. Research can help to assess barriers, facilitators, and needs, and subsequently to develop and evaluate corresponding strategies to successfully implement PCC and SDM in routine care, which remains challenging.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gesundheitspolitik; Implementierung; Patientenbeteiligung; health policy; implementation; partizipative Entscheidungsfindung; patient involvement; patient-centered care; patientenzentrierte Versorgung; shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28546055     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  17 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of a website with patients experiences of multiple sclerosis: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Anna Sippel; Jutta Scheiderbauer; Désirée Eklund; Sigrid Arnade; Stephan Schmidt; Ingo Kleiter; Rebecca Morrison; Christopher Kofahl; Christoph Heesen
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Valuing health-related quality of life: systematic variation in health perception.

Authors:  Manuel Huber; Martin Vogelmann; Reiner Leidl
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Perceived diabetes risk and related determinants in individuals with high actual diabetes risk: results from a nationwide population-based survey.

Authors:  Christin Heidemann; Rebecca Paprott; Lena M Stühmann; Jens Baumert; Kristin Mühlenbruch; Sylvia Hansen; Catarina Schiborn; Daniela Zahn; Paul Gellert; Christa Scheidt-Nave
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2019-06-21

4.  Implementation of patient-centred care: which organisational determinants matter from decision maker's perspective? Results from a qualitative interview study across various health and social care organisations.

Authors:  Kira Isabel Hower; Vera Vennedey; Hendrik Ansgar Hillen; Ludwig Kuntz; Stephanie Stock; Holger Pfaff; Lena Ansmann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Implementation of shared decision-making in oncology: development and pilot study of a nurse-led decision-coaching programme for women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Birte Berger-Höger; Katrin Liethmann; Ingrid Mühlhauser; Anke Steckelberg
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: study protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Isabelle Scholl; Pola Hahlweg; Anja Lindig; Carsten Bokemeyer; Anja Coym; Henning Hanken; Volkmar Müller; Ralf Smeets; Isabell Witzel; Levente Kriston; Martin Härter
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Translation and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Organisational Readiness for Implementing Change measure (ORIC): a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anja Lindig; Pola Hahlweg; Eva Christalle; Isabelle Scholl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Eva Christalle; Stefan Zeh; Pola Hahlweg; Levente Kriston; Martin Härter; Isabelle Scholl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Adaptation and qualitative evaluation of encounter decision aids in breast cancer care.

Authors:  Pola Hahlweg; Isabell Witzel; Volkmar Müller; Glyn Elwyn; Marie-Anne Durand; Isabelle Scholl
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Older and Wiser? The Need to Reexamine the Impact of Health Professionals Age and Experience on Competency-Based Practices.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Kristen Hicks-Roof; Chloe E Bailey; Hanadi Y Hamadi
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2021-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.