Literature DB >> 28544582

Evaluation by medical students of the educational value of multi-material and multi-colored three-dimensional printed models of the upper limb for anatomical education.

Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali1, Wai Yee Yeong2, Heang Kuan Joel Tan2, Gerald Jit Shen Tan1,3, Peter H Abrahams1, Nabil Zary1,4, Naomi Low-Beer1, Michael Alan Ferenczi1.   

Abstract

For centuries, cadaveric material has been the cornerstone of anatomical education. For reasons of changes in curriculum emphasis, cost, availability, expertise, and ethical concerns, several medical schools have replaced wet cadaveric specimens with plastinated prosections, plastic models, imaging, and digital models. Discussions about the qualities and limitations of these alternative teaching resources are on-going. We hypothesize that three-dimensional printed (3DP) models can replace or indeed enhance existing resources for anatomical education. A novel multi-colored and multi-material 3DP model of the upper limb was developed based on a plastinated upper limb prosection, capturing muscles, nerves, arteries and bones with a spatial resolution of ∼1 mm. This study aims to examine the educational value of the 3DP model from the learner's point of view. Students (n = 15) compared the developed 3DP models with the plastinated prosections, and provided their views on their learning experience using 3DP models using a survey and focus group discussion. Anatomical features in 3DP models were rated as accurate by all students. Several positive aspects of 3DP models were highlighted, such as the color coding by tissue type, flexibility and that less care was needed in the handling and examination of the specimen than plastinated specimens which facilitated the appreciation of relations between the anatomical structures. However, students reported that anatomical features in 3DP models are less realistic compared to the plastinated specimens. Multi-colored, multi-material 3DP models are a valuable resource for anatomical education and an excellent adjunct to wet cadaveric or plastinated prosections. Anat Sci Educ 11: 54-64.
© 2017 American Association of Anatomists. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.

Keywords:  3D printing; educational tools; gross anatomy education; medical education; multi-color 3D printing; multi-material; simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28544582     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  17 in total

1.  A novel three-dimensional electric ophthalmotrope for improving the teaching of ocular movements.

Authors:  Lei Xiong; Xiao-Yan Ding; Ya-Zhi Fan; Yao Xing; Xiao-Hui Zhang; Ting Li; Jian-Ming Wang; Feng Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  What Is the Role of 3D Printing in Undergraduate Anatomy Education? A Scoping Review of Current Literature and Recommendations.

Authors:  Jason Yuen
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-06-03

3.  Evaluating the value of a 3D printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination.

Authors:  Matthias Kiesel; Inga Beyers; Adam Kalisz; Achim Wöckel; Anne Quenzer; Tanja Schlaiß; Christine Wulff; Joachim Diessner
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2022-07-06

4.  Producing three-dimensional printed models of the hepatobiliary system from computed tomography imaging data.

Authors:  R W Smillie; M A Williams; M Richard; T Cosker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  3D Printing and Bioprinting in MEMS Technology.

Authors:  Chee Kai Chua; Wai Yee Yeong; Jia An
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.891

6.  Three-dimensional printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with renal tumors.

Authors:  Gang Fan; Yanbin Meng; Shuai Zhu; Mingji Ye; Mingfeng Li; Feiping Li; Yuanchun Ye; Zhizhong Liu; Han Weiqin; Yu Xie
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-07-21       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  The Impact of Three-Dimensional Printed Anatomical Models on First-Year Student Engagement in a Block Mode Delivery.

Authors:  Nicholas Tripodi; Kate Kelly; Maja Husaric; Rebecca Wospil; Michael Fleischmann; Susan Johnston; Katherine Harkin
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Evaluating phone camera and cloud service-based 3D imaging and printing of human bones for anatomical education.

Authors:  Qing-Yun Li; Qi Zhang; Chun Yan; Ye He; Mukuze Phillip; Fang Li; Ai-Hua Pan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-09       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  What would you like to print? Students' opinions on the use of 3D printing technology in medicine.

Authors:  Renata Wilk; Wirginia Likus; Andrzej Hudecki; Marita Syguła; Aleksandra Różycka-Nechoritis; Konstantinos Nechoritis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen Ye; Aishe Dun; Hanming Jiang; Cuifang Nie; Shulian Zhao; Tao Wang; Jing Zhai
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.