Literature DB >> 28542677

Association of Previous Clinical Breast Examination With Reduced Delays and Earlier-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis Among Women in Peru.

Anya Romanoff1,2, Tara Hayes Constant3, Kay M Johnson4,5, Manuel Cedano Guadiamos6, Ana María Burga Vega7, Joseph Zunt1, Benjamin O Anderson1,8,9.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Mammographic screening is impractical in most of the world where breast cancers are first identified based on clinical signs and symptoms. Clinical breast examination may improve early diagnosis directly by finding breast cancers at earlier stages or indirectly by heightening women's awareness of breast health concerns.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors that influence time to presentation and stage at diagnosis among patients with breast cancer to determine whether history of previous clinical breast examination is associated with earlier presentation and/or earlier cancer stage at diagnosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cross-sectional analysis of individual patient interviews using a validated Breast Cancer Delay Questionnaire, 113 (71.1%) of 159 women with breast cancer treated at a federally funded tertiary care referral cancer center in Trujillo, Peru, from February 1 through May 31, 2015, were studied. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Method of breast cancer detection and factors that influence time to and stage at diagnosis.
RESULTS: Of 113 women with diagnosed cancer (mean [SD] age, 54 [10.8] years; age range, 32-82 years), 105 (92.9%) had self-detected disease. Of the 93 women for whom stage was documented, 45 (48.4%) were diagnosed with early-stage disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage 0, I, or II), and 48 (51.6%) were diagnosed with late-stage disease (AJCC stage III or IV). Mean (SD) total delay from symptom onset to initiation of treatment was 407 (665) days because of patient (mean [SD], 198 [449] days) and health care system (mean [SD], 241 [556] days) delay. Fifty-two women (46.0%) had a history of clinical breast examination, and 23 (20.4%) had undergone previous mammography. Women who underwent a previous clinical breast examination were more likely to have shorter delays from symptom development to presentation compared with women who had never undergone a previous clinical breast examination (odds ratio, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.30-6.60; P = .01). Women diagnosed with shorter patient delay were more likely to be diagnosed with early-stage disease (AJCC stage 0, I, or II) than those with longer patient delay (31 [58.5%] vs 11 [30.6%], P = .01). Women who underwent a previous clinical breast examination were more likely to be diagnosed with early-stage disease compared with women who had never undergone previous clinical breast examination; this relationship remained significant after controlling for insurance and household income (odds ratio, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.01-5.95; P = .048). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In a population in which most breast cancers are self-detected, previous clinical breast examination was associated with shorter patient delay and earlier stage at breast cancer diagnosis. In regions of the world that lack mammographic screening, the routine use of clinical breast examination may provide a resource-appropriate strategy for improving breast cancer early diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28542677      PMCID: PMC5824208          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  8 in total

1.  Delays in diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer: a multinational analysis.

Authors:  Jacek Jassem; Vahit Ozmen; Florin Bacanu; Monika Drobniene; Janis Eglitis; Kuntegowdanahalli C Lakshmaiah; Zsuzsanna Kahan; Jozef Mardiak; Tadeusz Pieńkowski; Tatiana Semiglazova; Ljiljana Stamatovic; Constanta Timcheva; Suzana Vasovic; Damir Vrbanec; Piotr Zaborek
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.367

Review 2.  Challenges to the early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in developing countries.

Authors:  Karla Unger-Saldaña
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

3.  Clinical Breast Examination and Breast Cancer Screening Guideline.

Authors:  Benjamin O Anderson; Therese B Bevers; Robert W Carlson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low-income and middle-income countries: overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative Global Summit 2007.

Authors:  Benjamin O Anderson; Cheng-Har Yip; Robert A Smith; Roman Shyyan; Stephen F Sener; Alexandru Eniu; Robert W Carlson; Edward Azavedo; Joe Harford
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Breast health global initiative (BHGI) outline for program development in Latin America.

Authors:  Benjamin O Anderson; Eduardo Cazap
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2009

6.  Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Ruth Etzioni; Abbe Herzig; James S Michaelson; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Louise C Walter; Timothy R Church; Christopher R Flowers; Samuel J LaMonte; Andrew M D Wolf; Carol DeSantis; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Kimberly Andrews; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Debbie Saslow; Robert A Smith; Otis W Brawley; Richard Wender
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess delay in treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Karla Unger-Saldaña; Ingris Peláez-Ballestas; Claudia Infante-Castañeda
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer control interventions in Peru.

Authors:  Sten G Zelle; Tatiana Vidaurre; Julio E Abugattas; Javier E Manrique; Gustavo Sarria; José Jeronimo; Janice N Seinfeld; Jeremy A Lauer; Cecilia R Sepulveda; Diego Venegas; Rob Baltussen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  14 in total

1.  County of Residence and Screening Practices among Latinas and Non-Latina Whites in Two Rural Communities.

Authors:  Catherine Duggan; Yamile Molina; Elizabeth Carosso; Genoveva Ibarra; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  Breast cancer early detection: A phased approach to implementation.

Authors:  Ophira Ginsburg; Cheng-Har Yip; Ari Brooks; Anna Cabanes; Maira Caleffi; Jorge Antonio Dunstan Yataco; Bishal Gyawali; Valerie McCormack; Myrna McLaughlin de Anderson; Ravi Mehrotra; Alejandro Mohar; Raul Murillo; Lydia E Pace; Electra D Paskett; Anya Romanoff; Anne F Rositch; John R Scheel; Miriam Schneidman; Karla Unger-Saldaña; Verna Vanderpuye; Tsu-Yin Wu; Safina Yuma; Allison Dvaladze; Catherine Duggan; Benjamin O Anderson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Understanding linkage to biopsy and treatment for breast cancer after a high-risk telemammography result in Peru: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Jerome T Galea; Renato A Errea; Patricia J Garcia; Molly F Franke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Community health workers and early detection of breast cancer in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  James O'Donovan; Ashley Newcomb; MacKenzie Clark MacRae; Dorice Vieira; Chinelo Onyilofor; Ophira Ginsburg
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-05

Review 5.  Barriers in Latin America for the management of locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Pinto; Luis Pinillos; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Zaida Morante; Manuel V Villarán; Gerson Mejía; Christian Caglevic; Alfredo Aguilar; Williams Fajardo; Franz Usuga; Marcia Carrasco; Pamela Rebaza; Ana M Posada; Indira Tirado-Hurtado; Claudio Flores; Carlos S Vallejos
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2019-01-22

6.  Clinical Utility of a Hand-Held Scanner for Breast Cancer Early Detection and Patient Triage.

Authors:  Julie M Clanahan; Sanjana Reddy; Robyn B Broach; Anne F Rositch; Benjamin O Anderson; E Paul Wileyto; Brian S Englander; Ari D Brooks
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-02

7.  Impact of Community-Based Clinical Breast Examinations in Botswana.

Authors:  Michael Dykstra; Brighid Malone; Onica Lekuntwane; Jason Efstathiou; Virginia Letsatsi; Shekinah Elmore; Cesar Castro; Neo Tapela; Scott Dryden-Peterson
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2021-01

8.  Redefining Criteria to Ensure Adequate Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy With Dual Tracer for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Li Xu; Jiqiao Yang; Zhenggui Du; Faqing Liang; Yanyan Xie; Quanyi Long; Jie Chen; Helin Zeng; Qing Lv
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Drivers of advanced stage at breast cancer diagnosis in the multicountry African breast cancer - disparities in outcomes (ABC-DO) study.

Authors:  Fiona McKenzie; Annelle Zietsman; Moses Galukande; Angelica Anele; Charles Adisa; Groesbeck Parham; Leeya Pinder; Herbert Cubasch; Maureen Joffe; Frederick Kidaaga; Robert Lukande; Awa U Offiah; Ralph O Egejuru; Aaron Shibemba; Joachim Schuz; Benjamin O Anderson; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Valerie McCormack
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Nonpalpable breast masses: One-year ultrasound follow-up and morbidity outcomes in Shanghai.

Authors:  Hongmei Wen; Tao Xu; Qinhua Huang; Chumiao Zhang; Qi Zhang; Haiyan Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.