Kimberly Kontson1, Ian Marcus2, Barbara Myklebust1, Eugene Civillico1. 1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Labs, Division of Biomedical Physics, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America. 2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Device Evaluation, Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a functional outcome measure that is commonly used across multiple clinical populations due to its benefits of ease and speed of implementation; reliable, objective measurement; and repetition of motion. In this study, we introduce a novel outcome measure called the targeted BBT that allows for the study of initiation, grasping, and transport of objects, and also of object release. These modifications to the existing test may increase the ecological validity of the measure while still retaining the previously stated benefits of the standard BBT. METHODS: 19 able-bodied subjects performed the targeted BBT and two other standard tests. Using an integrated movement analysis framework based on motion capture and ground force data, quantitative information about how subjects completed these tests were captured. Kinematic parameters at the wrist, elbow, shoulder, thorax, and head, as well as measures of postural control, were calculated and statistically compared across the three tests. RESULTS: In general, the targeted BBT required significantly higher RoM at the elbow, shoulder, thorax and head when compared to standard tests. Peak angles at these joints were also higher during performance of the targeted BBT. Peak angles and RoM values for the targeted BBT were close to those found in studies of movements of able-bodied individuals performing activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: The targeted BBT allows analysis of repetitive movements, and may more closely model common real-world object manipulation scenarios in which a user is required to control a movement from pick-up to release.
BACKGROUND: The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a functional outcome measure that is commonly used across multiple clinical populations due to its benefits of ease and speed of implementation; reliable, objective measurement; and repetition of motion. In this study, we introduce a novel outcome measure called the targeted BBT that allows for the study of initiation, grasping, and transport of objects, and also of object release. These modifications to the existing test may increase the ecological validity of the measure while still retaining the previously stated benefits of the standard BBT. METHODS: 19 able-bodied subjects performed the targeted BBT and two other standard tests. Using an integrated movement analysis framework based on motion capture and ground force data, quantitative information about how subjects completed these tests were captured. Kinematic parameters at the wrist, elbow, shoulder, thorax, and head, as well as measures of postural control, were calculated and statistically compared across the three tests. RESULTS: In general, the targeted BBT required significantly higher RoM at the elbow, shoulder, thorax and head when compared to standard tests. Peak angles at these joints were also higher during performance of the targeted BBT. Peak angles and RoM values for the targeted BBT were close to those found in studies of movements of able-bodied individuals performing activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: The targeted BBT allows analysis of repetitive movements, and may more closely model common real-world object manipulation scenarios in which a user is required to control a movement from pick-up to release.
Authors: Matthew J Major; Rebecca L Stine; Craig W Heckathorne; Stefania Fatone; Steven A Gard Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Reem M Alwhaibi; Noha F Mahmoud; Hoda M Zakaria; Wanees M Badawy; Mahmoud Y Elzanaty; Walaa M Ragab; Maher S Benjadid; Nisreen N Al Awaji; Hager R Elserougy Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Reem M Alwhaibi; Noha F Mahmoud; Hoda M Zakaria; Walaa M Ragab; Nisreen N Al Awaji; Mahmoud Y Elzanaty; Hager R Elserougy Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2021-05-20