Literature DB >> 28541775

Cellular Response to Exponentially Increasing and Decreasing Dose Rates: Implications for Treatment Planning in Targeted Radionuclide Therapy.

Jay H Solanki1, Thomas Tritt1, Jordan B Pasternack1, Julia J Kim1, Calvin N Leung1, Jason D Domogauer1, Nicholas W Colangelo1, Venkat R Narra2, Roger W Howell1.   

Abstract

The treatment of cancer using targeted radionuclide therapy is of interest to nuclear medicine and radiation oncology because of its potential for killing tumor cells while minimizing dose-limiting toxicities to normal tissue. The ionizing radiations emitted by radiopharmaceuticals deliver radiation absorbed doses over protracted periods of time with continuously varying dose rates. As targeted radionuclide therapy becomes a more prominent part of cancer therapy, accurate models for estimating the biologically effective dose (BED) or equieffective dose (EQD2α/β) will become essential for treatment planning. This study examines the radiobiological impact of the dose rate increase half-time during the uptake phase of the radiopharmaceutical. MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells and V79 Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts were irradiated chronically with 662 keV γ rays delivered with time-varying dose rates that are clinically relevant. The temporal dose-rate patterns were: 1. acute, 2. exponential decrease with a half-time of 64 h (Td = 64 h), 3. initial exponential increase to a maximum (half time Ti = 2, 8 or 24 h) followed by exponential decrease (Td = 64 h). Cell survival assays were conducted and surviving fractions were determined. There was a marked reduction in biological effect when Ti was increased. Cell survival data were tested against existing dose-response models to assess their capacity to predict response. Currently accepted models that are used in radiation oncology overestimated BED and EQD2α/β at low-dose rates and underestimated them at high-dose rates. This appears to be caused by an adaptive response arising as a consequence of the initial low-dose-rate phase of exposure. An adaptive response function was derived that yields more accurate BED and EQD2α/β values over the spectrum of dose rates and absorbed doses delivered. Our experimental data demonstrate a marked increase in cell survival when the dose-rate-increase half-time is increased, thereby suggesting an adaptive response arising as a consequence of this phase of exposure. We have modified conventional radiobiological models used in the clinic for brachytherapy and external beams of radiation to account for this phenomenon and facilitate their use for treatment planning in targeted radionuclide therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28541775      PMCID: PMC5669265          DOI: 10.1667/RR14766.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  53 in total

1.  Role of the translationally controlled tumor protein in DNA damage sensing and repair.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Sonia M de Toledo; Badri N Pandey; Guozheng Guo; Debkumar Pain; Hong Li; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The skin: its structure and response to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  J W Hopewell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Small doses of high-linear energy transfer radiation increase the radioresistance of Chinese hamster V79 cells to subsequent X irradiation.

Authors:  B Marples; K A Skov
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Redefining relative biological effectiveness in the context of the EQDX formalism: implications for alpha-particle emitter therapy.

Authors:  Robert F Hobbs; Roger W Howell; Hong Song; Sébastien Baechler; George Sgouros
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Effectiveness of radon relative to acute 60Co gamma-rays for induction of micronuclei in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  A L Brooks; M A Khan; A Duncan; R L Buschbom; R F Jostes; F T Cross
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Radiation-induced adaptive response for protection against micronucleus formation and neoplastic transformation in C3H 10T1/2 mouse embryo cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; G P Raaphorst; R E Mitchel
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low concentrations of radioactive thymidine.

Authors:  G Olivieri; J Bodycote; S Wolff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Involvement of p53 in gemcitabine mediated cytotoxicity and radiosensitivity in breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Sameer D Salem; Faisal M Abou-Tarboush; Nadeem M Saeed; Waheeb D Al-Qadasi; M Abul Farah; Muneera Al-Buhairi; Najla Al-Harbi; Ibrahim Alhazza; Ghazi Alsbeih
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.688

9.  The impact of tumor cell proliferation in radioimmunotherapy.

Authors:  J A O'Donoghue
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  RadNuc: a graphical user interface to deliver dose rate patterns encountered in nuclear medicine with a 137Cs irradiator.

Authors:  Jordan B Pasternack; Roger W Howell
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.408

View more
  8 in total

1.  Radiation repair models for clinical application.

Authors:  Roger G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Predicting response of micrometastases with MIRDcell V3: proof of principle with 225Ac-DOTA encapsulating liposomes that produce different activity distributions in tumor spheroids.

Authors:  Sumudu Katugampola; Jianchao Wang; Aprameya Prasad; Stavroula Sofou; Roger W Howell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  The Radiobiology of Radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Zachary S Morris; Andrew Z Wang; Susan J Knox
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 5.934

4.  Comparison of radiobiological parameters for 90Y radionuclide therapy (RNT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in vitro.

Authors:  Yaser H Gholami; Kathy P Willowson; Nicholas J Forwood; Rozelle Harvie; Nicholas Hardcastle; Regina Bromley; HyunJu Ryu; Samuel Yuen; Viive M Howell; Zdenka Kuncic; Dale L Bailey
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2018-09-03

5.  Radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer to 90Y and the radiobiological implications for radioembolisation therapy.

Authors:  Boon Q Lee; Elliot M Abbott; Sarah Able; James M Thompson; Mark A Hill; Christiana Kartsonaki; Katherine A Vallis; Nadia Falzone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.174

6.  Dosimetric Evaluation of the Effect of Receptor Heterogeneity on the Therapeutic Efficacy of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: Correlation with DNA Damage Induction and In Vivo Survival.

Authors:  Giulia Tamborino; Julie Nonnekens; Marijke De Saint-Hubert; Lara Struelens; Danny Feijtel; Marion de Jong; Mark W Konijnenberg
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 11.082

7.  Radiation dose-rate is a neglected critical parameter in dose-response of insects.

Authors:  Hanano Yamada; Vanessa S Dias; Andrew G Parker; Hamidou Maiga; Carina Kraupa; Marc J B Vreysen; Wadaka Mamai; Marc F Schetelig; Nanwintoum S Bimbilé Somda; Jeremy Bouyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Modeling bystander effects that cause growth delay of breast cancer xenografts in bone marrow of mice treated with radium-223.

Authors:  Didier A Rajon; Brian S Canter; Calvin N Leung; Tom A Bäck; J Christopher Fritton; Edouard I Azzam; Roger W Howell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.352

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.