Literature DB >> 28541278

Sharing data under the 21st Century Cures Act.

Mary A Majumder1, Christi J Guerrini1, Juli M Bollinger1, Robert Cook-Deegan2, Amy L McGuire1.   

Abstract

On 13 December 2016, President Obama signed the 21st Century Cures Act ("the Act") into law. Many of its provisions support the creation of an "Information Commons," an ecosystem of separate but interconnected initiatives that facilitate open and responsible sharing of genomic and other data for research and clinical purposes. For example, the Act supports the National Institutes of Health in mandating data sharing, provides funding and guidance for the large national cohort program now known as All of Us, expresses congressional support for a global pediatric study network, and strengthens patient access to health information. The Act also addresses potential barriers to data sharing. For example, it makes the issuance of certificates of confidentiality automatic for federally funded research involving "identifiable, sensitive" information and strengthens the associated protections. At the same time, the Act exacerbates or neglects several challenges, for example, increasing complexity by adding a new definition of "identifiable" and failing to address the financial sustainability of data sharing and the scope of commercialization. In sum, the Act is a positive step, yet there is still much work to be done before the goals of broad data sharing and utilization can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28541278      PMCID: PMC6708407          DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  11 in total

1.  MYRIAD AFTER MYRIAD: THE PROPRIETARY DATA DILEMMA.

Authors:  John M Conley; Robert Cook-Deegan; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  N C J Law Technol       Date:  2014-06

2.  Genomics is failing on diversity.

Authors:  Alice B Popejoy; Stephanie M Fullerton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Differences in Access to and Use of Electronic Personal Health Information Between Rural and Urban Residents in the United States.

Authors:  Alexandra J Greenberg; Danielle Haney; Kelly D Blake; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Informed consent, comparative effectiveness, and learning health care.

Authors:  Ruth R Faden; Tom L Beauchamp; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Socioeconomic disparities in adoption of personal health records over time.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Baria Hafeez; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2017-01-19

7.  Laboratory and clinical genomic data sharing is crucial to improving genetic health care: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Mining the human genome after Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Beyond Our Borders? Public Resistance to Global Genomic Data Sharing.

Authors:  Mary A Majumder; Robert Cook-Deegan; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  The next controversy in genetic testing: clinical data as trade secrets?

Authors:  Robert Cook-Deegan; John M Conley; James P Evans; Daniel Vorhaus
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  7 in total

1.  Privacy Officers: Who They are and Where They Work.

Authors:  Amanda Walden; Kendall Cortelyou-Ward; Alice Noblin
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2021-03-15

Review 2.  Ethics in biological anthropology.

Authors:  Trudy R Turner; Jennifer K Wagner; Graciela S Cabana
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Pilar N Ossorio; Susan A Berry; Henry T Greely; Amy L McGuire; Michelle A Penny; Sharon F Terry
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Clinical Trial Participants' Views of the Risks and Benefits of Data Sharing.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Van Lieou; Steven N Goodman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Analysis of state laws on informed consent for clinical genetic testing in the era of genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Kayte Spector-Bagdady; Anya E R Prince; Joon-Ho Yu; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 6.  Clinical Decision Support Stewardship: Best Practices and Techniques to Monitor and Improve Interruptive Alerts.

Authors:  Juan D Chaparro; Jonathan M Beus; Adam C Dziorny; Philip A Hagedorn; Sean Hernandez; Swaminathan Kandaswamy; Eric S Kirkendall; Allison B McCoy; Naveen Muthu; Evan W Orenstein
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 2.762

7.  Enabling realistic health data re-identification risk assessment through adversarial modeling.

Authors:  Weiyi Xia; Yongtai Liu; Zhiyu Wan; Yevgeniy Vorobeychik; Murat Kantacioglu; Steve Nyemba; Ellen Wright Clayton; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.