Literature DB >> 28540617

Pediatric Patient and Caregiver Preferences in the Development of a Mobile Health Application for Management of Surgical Colorectal Conditions.

Mehul V Raval1,2, Natalie Taylor3,4, Kaitlin Piper3,4, Mitali Thakore3,4, Kathleen Hoff3,4, Shane Owens5, Megan M Durham3,4.   

Abstract

Patient-centered frameworks are an effective way to engage patients in treatment plans, strengthen adherence behaviors, and improve disease outcomes. These frameworks can also be applied in the design of mobile technology disease management applications. However, the utilization of these frameworks is rare and frequently overlooked in existing colorectal mobile health (mHealth) applications. The purpose of this study was to utilize a patient-centered framework to facilitate the development of a valid, appropriate, and feasible mHealth tool for pediatric patients and their caregivers. To inform application design and production, in-depth interviews were conducted with pediatric patients and their caregivers to capture management experiences, application preferences, and barriers and facilitators to application use. Patient ages ranged from 3 to 16. Six caregivers and 2 adolescent patients participated in the interviews. Patients and caregivers reported various management styles and desired an application that is not only user-friendly and customizable, but also able to facilitate communication and information sharing with other patients, caregivers, and providers. Older patients also wanted the application to give them more independence in managing their disease. Employing patient-centered frameworks is context-specific, but holds much promise at the intersection of mobile technology and healthcare. By incorporating pediatric patient experiences and viewpoints, we identified important components for inclusion in a mHealth surgical colorectal disease management application. Patients and caregivers wanted a mHealth application that was unique to their needs and easy to use. They suggested that the application include treatment tracking, note taking, and provider communication features.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Colorectal; Disease management; Patient engagement; Patient involvement; Patient-centered framework; Shared-decision making; mHealth

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28540617     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-017-0750-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  24 in total

1.  Behavioral Functioning and Treatment Adherence in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Review and Recommendations for Practice.

Authors:  Kevin A Hommel; Lee A Denson; Wallace V Crandall; Laura M Mackner
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2008-11-01

2.  Colorectal smartphone apps: opportunities and risks.

Authors:  S O'Neill; R R W Brady
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Barriers to adherence among adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Rachel Neff Greenley; Mike Stephens; Alyssa Doughty; Tara Raboin; Subra Kugathasan
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 4.  Factors associated with non-adherence to oral medication for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  C A Jackson; J Clatworthy; A Robinson; Rob Horne
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Oral medication adherence in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Laura M Mackner; Wallace V Crandall
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.325

6.  Rates and predictors of oral medication adherence in pediatric patients with IBD.

Authors:  Neal S LeLeiko; Debra Lobato; Sarah Hagin; Elizabeth McQuaid; Ronald Seifer; Sheryl J Kopel; Julie Boergers; Jack Nassau; Kristina Suorsa; Jason Shapiro; Barbara Bancroft
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.325

7.  Achieving fecal continence in patients with spina bifida: a descriptive cohort study.

Authors:  S Vande Velde; S Van Biervliet; K Van Renterghem; E Van Laecke; P Hoebeke; M Van Winckel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Practical strategies for enhancing adherence to treatment regimen in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Rachel N Greenley; Jennifer H Kunz; Jennifer Walter; Kevin A Hommel
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.325

9.  Treatment of fecal incontinence with a comprehensive bowel management program.

Authors:  Andrea Bischoff; Marc A Levitt; Cathy Bauer; Lyndsey Jackson; Monica Holder; Alberto Peña
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Mobile Phone Apps for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Self-Management: A Systematic Assessment of Content and Tools.

Authors:  Danny Con; Peter De Cruz
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.773

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mobile Technology Application for Improved Urine Concentration Measurement Pilot Study.

Authors:  Laura Walawender; Jeremy Patterson; Robert Strouse; John Ketz; Vijay Saxena; Emily Alexy; Andrew Schwaderer
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.418

2.  Creating an mHealth App for Colorectal Cancer Screening: User-Centered Design Approach.

Authors:  Lauren Griffin; Donghee Lee; Alyssa Jaisle; Peter Carek; Thomas George; Eric Laber; Benjamin Lok; François Modave; Electra Paskett; Janice Krieger
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2019-05-08

Review 3.  Using Patient and Family Engagement Strategies to Improve Outcomes of Health Information Technology Initiatives: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kevin Leung; Drew Lu-McLean; Craig Kuziemsky; Richard G Booth; Sarah Collins Rossetti; Elizabeth Borycki; Gillian Strudwick
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Children and young people's concerns and needs relating to their use of health technology to self-manage long-term conditions: a scoping review.

Authors:  Sarah Blower; Veronica Swallow; Camila Maturana; Simon Stones; Robert Phillips; Paul Dimitri; Zoe Marshman; Peter Knapp; Alexandra Dean; Steven Higgins; Ian Kellar; Penny Curtis; Nathaniel Mills; Jacqueline Martin-Kerry
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Preferences for Using a Mobile App in Sickle Cell Disease Self-management: Descriptive Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Tilicia L Mayo-Gamble; Delores Quasie-Woode; Jennifer Cunningham-Erves; Margo Rollins; David Schlundt; Kemberlee Bonnet; Velma McBride Murry
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-11-30

6.  What Kind Of A Mobile Health App Do Patients Truly Want? A Pilot Study Among Ambulatory Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Meng-Yan Tang; Zhi-Chao Li; Yan Dai; Xiao-Ling Li
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.711

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.