OBJECTIVES: Adherence is generally associated with improved treatment outcomes. Risk factors for non-adherence must be understood to improve adherence. A systematic review was undertaken to determine which variables were consistently associated with non-adherence to oral medication in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: The databases EMBASE, Medline, and PsycINFO were searched for titles relating to adherence, medication, and IBD (1980-2008). Primary, quantitative studies were included if they concerned adult patients with IBD, measured adherence to oral medication, and measured characteristics associated with adherence. The resulting 17 papers were independently reviewed by two researchers who also assessed their quality according to pre-defined criteria. The main outcome was the frequency with which demographic, clinical, treatment, and psychosocial variables were found to be statistically significantly associated with non-adherence. RESULTS: Non-adherence rates ranged from 7 to 72%, with most studies reporting that 30-45% of patients were non-adherent. No demographic, clinical, or treatment variables were consistently associated with non-adherence. Psychological distress and patients' beliefs about medications were both related to non-adherence in four out of five studies, and doctor-patient discordance was associated with non-adherence in two out of three studies. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest review of factors associated with non-adherence in IBD. Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were not consistently associated with non-adherence. Psychological distress, patients' beliefs about medications, and doctor-patient discordance were associated with non-adherence. These findings call into question some of the conclusions of earlier reviews that did not take into account nonsignificant findings. Practical suggestions for gastroenterologists and future research are discussed.
OBJECTIVES: Adherence is generally associated with improved treatment outcomes. Risk factors for non-adherence must be understood to improve adherence. A systematic review was undertaken to determine which variables were consistently associated with non-adherence to oral medication in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: The databases EMBASE, Medline, and PsycINFO were searched for titles relating to adherence, medication, and IBD (1980-2008). Primary, quantitative studies were included if they concerned adult patients with IBD, measured adherence to oral medication, and measured characteristics associated with adherence. The resulting 17 papers were independently reviewed by two researchers who also assessed their quality according to pre-defined criteria. The main outcome was the frequency with which demographic, clinical, treatment, and psychosocial variables were found to be statistically significantly associated with non-adherence. RESULTS: Non-adherence rates ranged from 7 to 72%, with most studies reporting that 30-45% of patients were non-adherent. No demographic, clinical, or treatment variables were consistently associated with non-adherence. Psychological distress and patients' beliefs about medications were both related to non-adherence in four out of five studies, and doctor-patient discordance was associated with non-adherence in two out of three studies. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest review of factors associated with non-adherence in IBD. Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were not consistently associated with non-adherence. Psychological distress, patients' beliefs about medications, and doctor-patient discordance were associated with non-adherence. These findings call into question some of the conclusions of earlier reviews that did not take into account nonsignificant findings. Practical suggestions for gastroenterologists and future research are discussed.
Authors: Jennifer L Bennett; Christina Y Ha; Jonathan E Efron; Susan L Gearhart; Mark G Lazarev; Elizabeth C Wick Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Christopher Ma; Chad J Evaschesen; Grenvil Gracias; Vivian W Huang; Darryl K Fedorak; Karen I Kroeker; Levinus A Dieleman; Brendan P Halloran; Richard N Fedorak Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-06-12
Authors: Kavita D Chandwani; Fengmin Zhao; Gary R Morrow; Teresa L Deshields; Lori M Minasian; Judith Manola; Michael J Fisch Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Christopher Andrew Lamb; Nicholas A Kennedy; Tim Raine; Philip Anthony Hendy; Philip J Smith; Jimmy K Limdi; Bu'Hussain Hayee; Miranda C E Lomer; Gareth C Parkes; Christian Selinger; Kevin J Barrett; R Justin Davies; Cathy Bennett; Stuart Gittens; Malcolm G Dunlop; Omar Faiz; Aileen Fraser; Vikki Garrick; Paul D Johnston; Miles Parkes; Jeremy Sanderson; Helen Terry; Daniel R Gaya; Tariq H Iqbal; Stuart A Taylor; Melissa Smith; Matthew Brookes; Richard Hansen; A Barney Hawthorne Journal: Gut Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Ana Gutiérrez; Pedro Zapater; Oriol Juanola; Laura Sempere; Marifé García; Raquel Laveda; Antonio Martínez; Michael Scharl; José M González-Navajas; José Such; Reiner Wiest; Gerhard Rogler; Rubén Francés Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Zaid Bilgrami; Ameer Abutaleb; Kenechukwu Chudy-Onwugaje; Patricia Langenberg; Miguel Regueiro; David A Schwartz; J Kathleen Tracy; Leyla Ghazi; Seema A Patil; Sandra M Quezada; Katharine M Russman; Charlene C Quinn; Guruprasad Jambaulikar; Dawn B Beaulieu; Sara Horst; Raymond K Cross Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2019-01-02 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Mike van der Have; Bas Oldenburg; Ad A Kaptein; Jeroen M Jansen; Robert C H Scheffer; Bas A van Tuyl; Andrea E van der Meulen-de Jong; Marieke Pierik; Peter D Siersema; Martijn G H van Oijen; Herma H Fidder Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 9.071