Literature DB >> 28540513

Utility of 3D printed temporal bones in pre-surgical planning for complex BoneBridge cases.

Payal Mukherjee1,2, Kai Cheng3, Sean Flanagan4, Simon Greenberg5.   

Abstract

With the advent of single-sided hearing loss increasingly being treated with cochlear implantation, bone conduction implants are reserved for cases of conductive and mixed hearing loss with greater complexity. The BoneBridge (BB, MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) is an active fully implantable device with no attenuation of sound energy through soft tissue. However, the floating mass transducer (FMT) part of the device is very bulky, which limits insertion in complicated ears. In this study, 3D printed temporal bones of patients were used to study its utility in preoperative planning on complicated cases. Computed tomography (CT) scans of 16 ears were used to 3D print their temporal bones. Three otologists graded the use of routine preoperative planning provided by MED-EL and that of operating on the 3D printed bone of the patient. Data were collated to assess the advantage and disadvantage of the technology. There was a statistically significant benefit in using 3D printed temporal bones to plan surgery for difficult cases of BoneBridge surgery compared to the current standard. Surgeons preferred to have the printed bones in theatre to plan their drill sites and make the transition of the planning to the patient's operation more precise. 3D printing is an innovative use of technology in the use of preoperative planning for complex ear surgery. Surgical planning can be done on the patient's own anatomy which may help to decrease operating time, reduce cost, increase surgical precision and thus reduce complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Atresia; Bone conduction implants; BoneBridge; Intact canal wall mastoidectomy; Microtia; Modified radical mastoidectomy; Presurgical planning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28540513     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4618-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  14 in total

1.  3D Printed Pediatric Temporal Bone: A Novel Training Model.

Authors:  Evan A Longfield; Todd M Brickman; Anita Jeyakumar
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Multi-material 3D Models for Temporal Bone Surgical Simulation.

Authors:  Austin S Rose; Julia S Kimbell; Caroline E Webster; Ola L A Harrysson; Eric J Formeister; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  3D-printed pediatric endoscopic ear surgery simulator for surgical training.

Authors:  Samuel R Barber; Elliott D Kozin; Matthew Dedmon; Brian M Lin; Kyuwon Lee; Sumi Sinha; Nicole Black; Aaron K Remenschneider; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.675

4.  Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant.

Authors:  Dominik Riss; Christoph Arnoldner; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Michaela Blineder; Stefan Flak; Anna Bachner; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Jafar-Sasan Hamzavi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  The use of 3D printed external and internal templates for Bonebridge implantation - technical note.

Authors:  I Pai; P Rojas; D Jiang; R Obholzer; T Coward
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.597

6.  Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Single-sided Deaf Listeners After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Daniel M Zeitler; Michael F Dorman; Sarah J Natale; Louise Loiselle; William A Yost; Rene H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 7.  The Bonebridge Bone Conduction Hearing Implant: indication criteria, surgery and a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  G M Sprinzl; A Wolf-Magele
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.597

Review 8.  Cochlear implantation for patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetrical hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Alice van Zon; Jeroen P M Peters; Inge Stegeman; Adriana L Smit; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  A clinical experience of 'STAMP' plate-guided Bonebridge implantation.

Authors:  Yutaka Takumi; Nozomu Matsumoto; Byunghyun Cho; Hidenori Ono; Kentaro Mori; Keita Tsukada; Aya Ichinose; Hidekane Yoshimura; Satoshi Iwasaki; Shizuo Komune; Shin-ichi Usami
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking.

Authors:  Melanie Swan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  3 in total

1.  Current Application and Future Prospects of 3D Printing in Otorhinolaryngology-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Devendra Tiwari; Ravi Kumar Vobilisetty; Baveena Heer
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-05-27

Review 2.  Progressive 3D Printing Technology and Its Application in Medical Materials.

Authors:  Daoyang Fan; Yan Li; Xing Wang; Tengjiao Zhu; Qi Wang; Hong Cai; Weishi Li; Yun Tian; Zhongjun Liu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  What would you like to print? Students' opinions on the use of 3D printing technology in medicine.

Authors:  Renata Wilk; Wirginia Likus; Andrzej Hudecki; Marita Syguła; Aleksandra Różycka-Nechoritis; Konstantinos Nechoritis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.