Literature DB >> 28540417

Monitoring early response to chemoradiotherapy with 18F-FMISO dynamic PET in head and neck cancer.

Milan Grkovski1, Nancy Y Lee2, Heiko Schöder3, Sean D Carlin3, Bradley J Beattie4, Nadeem Riaz2, Jonathan E Leeman2, Joseph A O'Donoghue4, John L Humm4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is growing recognition that biologic features of the tumor microenvironment affect the response to cancer therapies and the outcome of cancer patients. In head and neck cancer (HNC) one such feature is hypoxia. We investigated the utility of 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) dynamic positron emission tomography (dPET) for monitoring the early microenvironmental response to chemoradiotherapy in HNC. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Seventy-two HNC patients underwent FMISO dPET scans in a customized immobilization mask (0-30 min dynamic acquisition, followed by 10 min static acquisitions starting at ∼95 min and ∼160 min post-injection) at baseline and early into treatment where patients have already received one cycle of chemotherapy and anywhere from five to ten fractions of 2 Gy per fraction radiation therapy. Voxelwise pharmacokinetic modeling was conducted using an irreversible one-plasma two-tissue compartment model to calculate surrogate biomarkers of tumor hypoxia (k 3 and Tumor-to-Blood Ratio (TBR)), perfusion (K 1 ) and FMISO distribution volume (DV). Additionally, Tumor-to-Muscle Ratios (TMR) were derived by visual inspection by an experienced nuclear medicine physician, with TMR > 1.2 defining hypoxia.
RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five lesions in total were analyzed. TBR, k 3 and DV decreased on early response scans, while no significant change was observed for K 1 . The k 3 -TBR correlation decreased substantially from baseline scans (Pearson's r = 0.72 and 0.76 for mean intratumor and pooled voxelwise values, respectively) to early response scans (Pearson's r = 0.39 and 0.40, respectively). Both concordant and discordant examples of changes in intratumor k 3 and TBR were identified; the latter partially mediated by the change in DV. In 13 normoxic patients according to visual analysis (all having lesions with TMR = 1.2), subvolumes were identified where k 3 indicated the presence of hypoxia.
CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetic modeling of FMISO dynamic PET reveals a more detailed characterization of the tumor microenvironment and assessment of response to chemoradiotherapy in HNC patients than a single static image does. In a clinical trial where absence of hypoxia in primary tumor and lymph nodes would lead to de-escalation of therapy, the observed disagreement between visual analysis and pharmacokinetic modeling results would have affected patient management in <20% cases. While simple static PET imaging is easily implemented for clinical trials, the clinical applicability of pharmacokinetic modeling remains to be investigated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FMISO; Dynamic PET; Head and neck cancer; Hypoxia; Treatment response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28540417      PMCID: PMC6563902          DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3720-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  28 in total

1.  Multiparametric imaging of tumor response to therapy.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Kenneth A Miles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Imaging of hypoxia in human tumors with [F-18]fluoromisonidazole.

Authors:  W J Koh; J S Rasey; M L Evans; J R Grierson; T K Lewellen; M M Graham; K A Krohn; T W Griffin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Exploratory prospective trial of hypoxia-specific PET imaging during radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Nasreddin Abolmaali; Rosalind Perrin; Andrij Abramyuk; Robert Haase; Steffen Appold; Jörg Steinbach; Jörg Kotzerke; Michael Baumann
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Quantifying regional hypoxia in human tumors with positron emission tomography of [18F]fluoromisonidazole: a pretherapy study of 37 patients.

Authors:  J S Rasey; W J Koh; M L Evans; L M Peterson; T K Lewellen; M M Graham; K A Krohn
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Phase III randomized trial of weekly cisplatin and irradiation versus cisplatin and tirapazamine and irradiation in stages IB2, IIA, IIB, IIIB, and IVA cervical carcinoma limited to the pelvis: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Paul A DiSilvestro; Shamshad Ali; Peter S Craighead; Joseph A Lucci; Yi-Chun Lee; David E Cohn; Nicola M Spirtos; Krishnasu S Tewari; Carolyn Muller; Walter H Gajewski; Margaret M Steinhoff; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prognostic significance of plasma osteopontin in patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated on TROG 02.02 phase III trial.

Authors:  Annette M Lim; Danny Rischin; Richard Fisher; Hongbin Cao; Kathleen Kwok; Daniel Truong; Grant A McArthur; Richard J Young; Amato Giaccia; Lester Peters; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  High reproducibility of tumor hypoxia evaluated by 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Shozo Okamoto; Tohru Shiga; Koichi Yasuda; Yoichi M Ito; Keiichi Magota; Katsuhiko Kasai; Yuji Kuge; Hiroki Shirato; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  New ways to image and target tumour hypoxia and its molecular responses.

Authors:  Ludwig J Dubois; Raymon Niemans; Simon J A van Kuijk; Kranthi M Panth; Nanda-Kumar Parvathaneni; Sarah G J A Peeters; Catharina M L Zegers; Nicolle H Rekers; Marike W van Gisbergen; Rianne Biemans; Natasja G Lieuwes; Linda Spiegelberg; Ala Yaromina; Jean-Yves Winum; Marc Vooijs; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 9.  PET monitoring of therapy response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Heiko Schöder; Matthew Fury; Nancy Lee; Dennis Kraus
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Strategy of Using Intratreatment Hypoxia Imaging to Selectively and Safely Guide Radiation Dose De-escalation Concurrent With Chemotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Nancy Lee; Heiko Schoder; Brad Beattie; Ryan Lanning; Nadeem Riaz; Sean McBride; Nora Katabi; Duan Li; Brett Yarusi; Susie Chan; Lindsey Mitrani; Zhigang Zhang; David G Pfister; Eric Sherman; Shrujal Baxi; Jay Boyle; Luc G T Morris; Ian Ganly; Richard Wong; John Humm
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  18 in total

1.  Predicting hypoxia status using a combination of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography radiomics features.

Authors:  Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar; Aditya Apte; Milan Grkovski; Jung Hun Oh; Nancy Y Lee; Heiko Schöder; John L Humm; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Prospective Evaluation of a Tumor Control Probability Model Based on Dynamic 18F-FMISO PET for Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Daniela Thorwarth; Stefan Welz; David Mönnich; Christina Pfannenberg; Konstantin Nikolaou; Matthias Reimold; Christian La Fougère; Gerald Reischl; Paul-Stefan Mauz; Frank Paulsen; Markus Alber; Claus Belka; Daniel Zips
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Longitudinal PET imaging of tumor hypoxia during the course of radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sonja Stieb; Afroditi Eleftheriou; Geoffrey Warnock; Matthias Guckenberger; Oliver Riesterer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Correlative analyses between tissue-based hypoxia biomarkers and hypoxia PET imaging in head and neck cancer patients during radiochemotherapy-results from a prospective trial.

Authors:  Nils H Nicolay; Nicole Wiedenmann; Michael Mix; Wolfgang A Weber; Martin Werner; Anca L Grosu; Gian Kayser
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Precision Radiotherapy: Reduction in Radiation for Oropharyngeal Cancer in the 30 ROC Trial.

Authors:  Nadeem Riaz; Eric Sherman; Xin Pei; Heiko Schöder; Milan Grkovski; Ramesh Paudyal; Nora Katabi; Pier Selenica; Takafumi N Yamaguchi; Daniel Ma; Simon K Lee; Rachna Shah; Rahul Kumar; Fengshen Kuo; Abhirami Ratnakumar; Nathan Aleynick; David Brown; Zhigang Zhang; Vaios Hatzoglou; Lydia Y Liu; Adriana Salcedo; Chiaojung J Tsai; Sean McBride; Luc G T Morris; Jay Boyle; Bhuvanesh Singh; Daniel S Higginson; Rama R Damerla; Arnaud da Cruz Paula; Katharine Price; Eric J Moore; Joaquin J Garcia; Robert Foote; Alan Ho; Richard J Wong; Timothy A Chan; Simon N Powell; Paul C Boutros; John L Humm; Amita Shukla-Dave; David Pfister; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Nancy Lee
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Impact of tissue transport on PET hypoxia quantification in pancreatic tumours.

Authors:  Edward Taylor; Jennifer Gottwald; Ivan Yeung; Harald Keller; Michael Milosevic; Neesha C Dhani; Iram Siddiqui; David W Hedley; David A Jaffray
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.138

7.  Assessment of tumour hypoxia, proliferation and glucose metabolism in head and neck cancer before and during treatment.

Authors:  Joanna Kazmierska; Witold Cholewinski; Tomasz Piotrowski; Anna Sowinska; Bartosz Bak; Paulina Cegła; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Constantin Lapa; Ursula Nestle; Nathalie L Albert; Christian Baues; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Volker Budach; Rebecca Bütof; Stephanie E Combs; Thorsten Derlin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christian Furth; Cihan Gani; Eleni Gkika; Anca-L Grosu; Christoph Henkenberens; Harun Ilhan; Steffen Löck; Simone Marnitz-Schulze; Matthias Miederer; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Maximilian Niyazi; Christoph Pöttgen; Claus M Rödel; Imke Schatka; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Andrei S Todica; Wolfgang Weber; Simone Wegen; Thomas Wiegel; Constantinos Zamboglou; Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Sebastian Zschaeck; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging for radiotherapy purposes.

Authors:  Oliver J Gurney-Champion; Faisal Mahmood; Marcel van Schie; Robert Julian; Ben George; Marielle E P Philippens; Uulke A van der Heide; Daniela Thorwarth; Kathrine R Redalen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 10.  European research trends in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Masayuki Inubushi; Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Yuka Yamamoto; Katsuhiko Kato; Tetsuya Tsujikawa; Ryuichi Nishii
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.