| Literature DB >> 28539966 |
V S Carrara1, L C Filho1, V A S Garcia1, V S Faiões2, E F Cunha-Júnior2, E C Torres-Santos2, D A G Cortez3.
Abstract
Supercritical fluid extraction was used to extract the alkaloid N-[7-(3',4'-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2(Z),4(Z)-heptadienoyl]pyrrolidine from leaves of Piper amalago L. A three-level orthogonal array design matrix, OAD OA9(34), was used for optimization of the parameters of supercritical extraction of the alkaloid, employing supercritical carbon dioxide: extraction time (20, 40, and 60 min), temperature (40, 50, and 60°C), pressure (150, 200, and 250 bar), and the use of cosolvents (ethanol, methanol, and propyleneglycol). All parameters had significant effect on the alkaloid yield. The alkaloid yield after 60 min of extraction without cosolvents at 9 different conditions (32) in terms of temperature (40, 50, and 60°C) and pressure (150, 200, and 250 bar) was also evaluated. The optimal yield (≈3.8 mg g-1) was obtained with supercritical CO2 + methanol (5% v : v) at 40°C and 200 bar for 60 min of extraction.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28539966 PMCID: PMC5433416 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7401748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Orthogonal array design matrix OAD OA9(3)4 and experimental results of alkaloid 1 yield.
| Run | Factors | Responses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cosolvent |
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | Ethanol | 20 | 40 | 150 | 0.29 ± 0.02 |
| 2 | Ethanol | 40 | 50 | 200 | 1.2 ± 0.3 |
| 3 | Ethanol | 60 | 60 | 250 | 1.59 ± 0.07 |
| 4 | Methanol | 20 | 50 | 250 | 1.0 ± 0.3 |
| 5 | Methanol | 40 | 60 | 150 | 0.7 ± 0.9 |
| 6 | Methanol | 60 | 40 | 200 | 3.8 ± 0.8 |
| 7 | Propyleneglycol | 20 | 60 | 200 | 1.9 ± 0.3 |
| 8 | Propyleneglycol | 40 | 40 | 250 | 1.86 ± 0.08 |
| 9 | Propyleneglycol | 60 | 50 | 150 | 0.73 ± 0.01 |
Y Ap = yield of the alkaloid in the plant.
Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (σ).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of four parameters for the extraction using supercritical CO2 and cosolvents.
| Sum of squares | Degrees of freedom |
|
|
| Effect | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cosolvent | 2.3 | 2 | 1.1 | 7.4 | 0.01 | Significant |
| Time | 3.1 | 2 | 1.5 | 10.0 | 0.005 | Significant |
| Temperature | 3.1 | 2 | 1.6 | 10.0 | 0.005 | Significant |
| Pressure | 8.3 | 2 | 4.1 | 26.6 | 0.0002 | Significant |
| Residual | 1.4 | 9 | 0.15 |
Figure 1(a) Chromatogram of an extract obtained by supercritical CO2 + 5% methanol (v : v) at 40°C, 200 bar for 60 min. (b) Chromatogram of the examined alkaloid whose retention time was 4 min. Chromatograph conditions: column Kinetex C18 column Phenomenex (150 × 4.6 mm, d.i.), at 25°C; mobile phase used was 58% of acetonitrile and 42% of water containing 1% of acetic acid, changing to 100% of acetonitrile at 7 min to 11 min, returning to 58% of acetonitrile and 42% of water at 11 min to 12 min, flow rate of 1 ml/min; temperature at 25°C; detection at 260 nm.
Figure 2The effect of the parameters on the alkaloid yield. Cosolvent (1 = ethanol, 2 = methanol, and 3 = propyleneglycol); time (1 = 20 min, 2 = 40 min, and 3 = 60 min); temperature (1 = 40°C, 2 = 50°C, and 3 = 60°C); pressure (1 = 150 bar, 2 = 200 bar, and 3 = 250 bar). The error bar shows standard deviations for n = 3.
Alkaloid yield for extraction without cosolvents (only CO2) at different pressures and temperatures (t = 60 min).
| Run | Factors | Responses | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| 10 | 40 | 150 | 0.42 ± 1 |
| 11 | 50 | 150 | 0.54 ± 2 |
| 12 | 60 | 150 | 0.48 ± 2 |
| 13 | 40 | 200 | 0.97 ± 3 |
| 14 | 50 | 200 | 0.90 ± 12 |
| 15 | 60 | 200 | 1.04 ± 2 |
| 16 | 40 | 250 | 0.75 ± 2 |
| 17 | 50 | 250 | 0.71 ± 1 |
| 18 | 60 | 250 | 1.11 ± 2 |
Y Ae = yield of the alkaloid in the extract. YAp = yield of the alkaloid in the plant.
Results are expressed as mean ± relative standard deviation (σR).