| Literature DB >> 28537887 |
Yanming Yu1, Junde Zhou2, Chen Gong1, Zhiping Long1, Jingshen Tian1, Lin Zhu1, Jing Li1, Hongyuan Yu1, Fan Wang1, Yashuang Zhao1.
Abstract
Long-term dietary intake influences the structure and activity of microorganisms residing in the human gut. The immune response and gut microbiota have a mutual influence on the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). This study examines the association of gut microbiota-related dietary factors and polymorphisms in the microRNA-binding site of the interleukin 13 gene (IL13) with the risk and prognosis of CRC. Three polymorphisms (rs847, rs848, and rs1295685) were selected for genotyping in a case-control study (513 cases, 572 controls), and 386 CRC patients were followed up. Two dietary factors closely related with gut microbiota (allium vegetables, overnight meal) were significantly associated with CRC development. Although the three SNPs showed no statistically significant associations with the risk and prognosis of CRC, a significant antagonistic interaction was found between rs848 (G-T) and allium vegetable intake (ORi (odds ratio of interaction), 0.92; 95% CI (confidence interval): 0.86, 0.99; P = 0.03); moreover, significant combined and synergistic interactions were observed for all three SNPs and overnight meal intake. This is the first report of significant combined and interactive effects between dietary factors and polymorphisms in the microRNA binding site of IL13 in CRC and may provide direct guidance on intake of allium vegetable and overnight meals for individuals with specific genetic variants of IL13 to modify their susceptibility to CRC.Entities:
Keywords: IL13; colorectal cancer; dietary factors; miRNA-binding site; polymorphisms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28537887 PMCID: PMC5564572 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Demographics and baseline characteristics of study subjects
| Characteristics | Cases (513) | Controls (576) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age(years)a mean ± s.d. | 60.14 ± 11.29 | 57.16 ± 11.25 | < 0.001 |
| Gender | 0.805 | ||
| Male | 302 (58.87) | 334 (57.99) | |
| Female | 211 (41.13) | 242 (42.01) | |
| BMI(kg/m2)a mean ± s.d. | 23.26 ± 3.35 | 24.27 ± 4.14 | < 0.001 |
| Occupation | < 0.001 | ||
| Mental worker | 199 (38.79) | 156 (27.08) | |
| Physical worker | 224 (43.66) | 266 (46.18) | 0.003 |
| Combined | 86 (16.76) | 154 (26.74) | |
| Education | 0.424 | ||
| Illiterate | 134 (26.12) | 168 (29.17) | |
| Primary school | 151 (29.43) | 174 (30.21) | |
| high school or above | 204 (39.77) | 210 (36.46) | |
| Family history of cancer | 0.168 | ||
| No | 408 (79.53) | 484 (84.03) | |
| Yes | 94 (18.32) | 89 (15.45) | |
| Tumor site | |||
| Colon | 168 (32.75) | ||
| Rectal | 312 (60.82) | ||
| Cecum | 30 (5.85) |
aAge and BMI are continuous variables, the others are categorical variables.
Missing data: tumor site, 3.
Association between microRNA-binding site polymorphisms in IL13 gene and the risk of colorectal cancer
| Genotypes | Cases | Controls | ORadjusted (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No.(%) | No.(%) | |||
| rs847 A>G | ||||
| GG | 247 (48.15) | 277 (48.09) | 1.00 | |
| AG | 231 (45.03) | 246 (42.71) | 0.69 (0.42–1.14) | 0.15 |
| AA | 31 (6.04) | 49 (8.51) | 1.03 (0.80–1.33) | 0.84 |
| Dominant model | 0.97 (0.76–1.25) | 0.83 | ||
| Recessive model | 0.68 (0.42–1.11) | 0.12 | ||
| rs848 T>G | ||||
| GG | 247 (48.15) | 278 (48.26) | 1.00 | |
| GT | 227 (44.25) | 240 (41.67) | 1.03 (0.79–1.33) | 0.84 |
| TT | 35 (6.82) | 49 (8.50) | 0.78 (0.48–1.26) | 0.31 |
| Dominant model | 0.99 (0.77–1.27) | 0.93 | ||
| Recessive model | 0.77 (0.48–1.23) | 0.27 | ||
| rs1295685 C>T | ||||
| CC | 245 (47.76) | 272 (47.22) | 1.00 | |
| CT | 225 (43.86) | 238 (41.32) | 1.02 (0.79–1.32) | 0.87 |
| TT | 31 (6.04) | 53 (9.20) | 0.63 (0.39–1.04) | 0.07 |
| Dominant model | 0.96 (0.75–1.22) | 0.72 | ||
| Recessive model | 0.63 (0.39–1.01) | 0.06 |
ORadjusted: adjusted for BMI, occupation, and age
Combined and interactive effects of microRNA–binding site polymorphisms in IL13 and dietary factors on the risk of colorectal cancer
| SNPs | Dietary factors | Cases (No.) | Controls (No.) | Adjusted ORdg (95% CI) | P– value | Adjusted ORi (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs847 | Allium vegetables# (times/week) | 0.92 (0.84–1.01) | 0.08 | ||||
| GG | < 1 | 83 | 69 | 1 | |||
| GG | 1–3 | 59 | 68 | 0.85 (0.52–1.39) | 0.53 | ||
| GG | 4–6 | 34 | 59 | 0.51 (0.30–0.88) | 0.02 | ||
| GG | > 7 | 71 | 79 | 0.81 (0.51–1.29) | 0.37 | ||
| AG+AA | < 1 | 70 | 64 | 0.92 (0.57–1.49) | 0.74 | ||
| AG+AA | 1–3 | 61 | 75 | 0.68 (0.42–1.10) | 0.11 | ||
| AG+AA | 4–6 | 50 | 68 | 0.65 (0.39–1.08) | 0.09 | ||
| AG+AA | > 7 | 80 | 88 | 0.83 (0.53–1.32) | 0.44 | ||
| rs847 | Overnight meal$ (times/week) | 1.25 (1.08–1.43) | 0.002 | ||||
| GG | < 1 | 47 | 64 | 1 | |||
| GG | 1–3 | 96 | 121 | 1.11 (0.69–1.79) | 0.68 | ||
| GG | > 3 | 104 | 92 | 1.66 (1.02–2.70) | 0.04 | ||
| AG+AA | < 1 | 54 | 63 | 1.14 (0.67–1.97) | 0.63 | ||
| AG+AA | 1–3 | 96 | 142 | 0.90 (0.56–1.45) | 0.67 | ||
| AG+AA | > 3 | 111 | 88 | 1.84 (1.13–3.01) | 0.01 | ||
| rs848 | Allium vegetables (times/week) | 0.92 (0.86–0.99) | 0.03 | ||||
| GG | < 1 | 84 | 69 | 1 | |||
| GG | 1–3 | 57 | 70 | 0.79 (0.48–1.29) | 0.34 | ||
| GG | 4–6 | 35 | 57 | 0.53 (0.31–0.91) | 0.02 | ||
| GG | > 7 | 71 | 80 | 0.78 (0.49–1.24) | 0.29 | ||
| GT+TT | < 1 | 68 | 63 | 0.89 (0.55–1.44) | 0.63 | ||
| GT+TT | 1–3 | 63 | 70 | 0.72 (0.44–1.17) | 0.18 | ||
| GT+TT | 4–6 | 49 | 67 | 0.63 (0.38–1.05) | 0.07 | ||
| GT+TT | > 7 | 81 | 89 | 0.81 (0.52–1.27) | 0.36 | ||
| rs848 | Overnight meal (times/week) | 1.24 (1.08–1.42) | 0.002 | ||||
| GG | < 1 | 49 | 63 | 1 | |||
| GG | 1–3 | 97 | 120 | 1.07 (0.66–1.72) | 0.79 | ||
| GG | > 3 | 101 | 95 | 1.41 (0.91–2.39) | 0.12 | ||
| GT+TT | < 1 | 54 | 63 | 1.07 (0.62–1.83) | 0.81 | ||
| GT+TT | 1–3 | 93 | 139 | 0.84 (0.52–1.34) | 0.45 | ||
| GT+TT | > 3 | 114 | 85 | 1.82 (1.12–2.96) | 0.02 | ||
| rs1295685 | Allium vegetables (times/week) | 0.92 (0.84–1.00) | 0.06 | ||||
| CC | < 1 | 84 | 67 | 1 | |||
| CC | 1–3 | 58 | 66 | 0.82 (0.50–1.34) | 0.42 | ||
| CC | 4–6 | 34 | 58 | 0.50 (0.29–0.86) | 0.01 | ||
| CC | > 7 | 69 | 79 | 0.76 (0.41–1.21) | 0.24 | ||
| CT+TT | < 1 | 67 | 65 | 0.84 (0.52–1.36) | 0.47 | ||
| CT+TT | 1–3 | 59 | 73 | 0.64 (0.40–1.05) | 0.08 | ||
| CT+TT | 4–6 | 50 | 65 | 0.65 (0.39–1.07) | 0.09 | ||
| CT+TT | > 7 | 79 | 88 | 0.78 (0.50–1.24) | 0.29 | ||
| rs1295685 | Overnight meal (times/week) | 1.21 (1.05–1.39) | 0.008 | ||||
| CC | < 1 | 46 | 63 | 1 | |||
| CC | 1–3 | 96 | 121 | 1.12 (0.69–1.81) | 0.65 | ||
| CC | > 3 | 103 | 88 | 1.72 (1.05–2.81) | 0.03 | ||
| CT+TT | < 1 | 53 | 62 | 1.13 (0.65–1.95) | 0.66 | ||
| CT+TT | 1–3 | 92 | 138 | 0.90 (0.55–1.45) | 0.65 | ||
| CT+TT | > 3 | 110 | 89 | 1.82 (1.16–2.98) | 0.02 | ||
*P value for interaction analysis conducted by multivariate logistic regression.
#Allium vegetables, vegetables in the Allium genus include onions, shallots, leeks and scallions, as well as herbs like garlic and chives.
$Overnight meal, the vegetables, egg, meat that have been cooked and left overninght.
SNP, Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
ORdg, OR for combined effects of dietary factors and genetic factors
ORi, OR for interactive effects of dietary factors and genetic factors