Literature DB >> 28536804

Modeling Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Data with a Constrained Local AIF.

Chong Duan1, Jesper F Kallehauge2,3, Carlos J Pérez-Torres4,5, G Larry Bretthorst6, Scott C Beeman4, Kari Tanderup3,6,7, Joseph J H Ackerman1,4,8,9, Joel R Garbow10,11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to develop a constrained local arterial input function (cL-AIF) to improve quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data by accounting for the contrast-agent bolus amplitude error in the voxel-specific AIF. PROCEDURES: Bayesian probability theory-based parameter estimation and model selection were used to compare tracer kinetic modeling employing either the measured remote-AIF (R-AIF, i.e., the traditional approach) or an inferred cL-AIF against both in silico DCE-MRI data and clinical, cervical cancer DCE-MRI data.
RESULTS: When the data model included the cL-AIF, tracer kinetic parameters were correctly estimated from in silico data under contrast-to-noise conditions typical of clinical DCE-MRI experiments. Considering the clinical cervical cancer data, Bayesian model selection was performed for all tumor voxels of the 16 patients (35,602 voxels in total). Among those voxels, a tracer kinetic model that employed the voxel-specific cL-AIF was preferred (i.e., had a higher posterior probability) in 80 % of the voxels compared to the direct use of a single R-AIF. Maps of spatial variation in voxel-specific AIF bolus amplitude and arrival time for heterogeneous tissues, such as cervical cancer, are accessible with the cL-AIF approach.
CONCLUSIONS: The cL-AIF method, which estimates unique local-AIF amplitude and arrival time for each voxel within the tissue of interest, provides better modeling of DCE-MRI data than the use of a single, measured R-AIF. The Bayesian-based data analysis described herein affords estimates of uncertainties for each model parameter, via posterior probability density functions, and voxel-wise comparison across methods/models, via model selection in data modeling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy and precision; Arterial input function; Bayesian inference; Cancer; Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE); Quantitation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28536804      PMCID: PMC6374048          DOI: 10.1007/s11307-017-1090-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  24 in total

1.  Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition.

Authors:  F Calamante; D G Gadian; A Connelly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Effects of tracer arrival time on flow estimates in MR perfusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Ona Wu; Leif Østergaard; Walter J Koroshetz; Lee H Schwamm; Joanie O'Donnell; Pamela W Schaefer; Bruce R Rosen; Robert M Weisskoff; A Gregory Sorensen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Classic models for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Steven P Sourbron; David L Buckley
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI with localized arterial input functions.

Authors:  John J Lee; G Larry Bretthorst; Colin P Derdeyn; William J Powers; Tom O Videen; Abraham Z Snyder; Joanne Markham; Joshua S Shimony
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using Gd-DTPA: interindividual variability of the arterial input function and consequences for the assessment of kinetics in tumors.

Authors:  R E Port; M V Knopp; G Brix
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Improved prediction of final infarct volume using bolus delay-corrected perfusion-weighted MRI: implications for the ischemic penumbra.

Authors:  Stephen E Rose; Andrew L Janke; Mark Griffin; Simon Finnigan; Jonathan B Chalk
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Model-based blind estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI.

Authors:  Jacob U Fluckiger; Matthias C Schabel; Edward V R Dibella
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Modeling of contrast agent kinetics in the lung using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Josephine H Naish; Lucy E Kershaw; David L Buckley; Alan Jackson; John C Waterton; Geoffrey J M Parker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Hyperthermic Laser Ablation of Recurrent Glioblastoma Leads to Temporary Disruption of the Peritumoral Blood Brain Barrier.

Authors:  Eric C Leuthardt; Chong Duan; Michael J Kim; Jian L Campian; Albert H Kim; Michelle M Miller-Thomas; Joshua S Shimony; David D Tran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Estimation of the capillary level input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast using a deep learning approach.

Authors:  Jonghyun Bae; Zhengnan Huang; Florian Knoll; Krzysztof Geras; Terlika Pandit Sood; Li Feng; Laura Heacock; Linda Moy; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Bone marrow MR perfusion imaging and potential for tumor evaluation.

Authors:  James F Griffith; R A van der Heijden
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 2.128

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.