| Literature DB >> 28536286 |
Kimberly C Lemmer1, Weiping Zhang1,2, Samantha J Langer1, Alice C Dohnalkova3, Dehong Hu3, Rachelle A Lemke4, Jeff S Piotrowski1, Galya Orr3, Daniel R Noguera1,2, Timothy J Donohue5,4.
Abstract
Lipids from microbes offer a promising source of renewable alternatives to petroleum-derived compounds. In particular, oleaginous microbes are of interest because they accumulate a large fraction of their biomass as lipids. In this study, we analyzed genetic changes that alter lipid accumulation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides By screening an R. sphaeroides Tn5 mutant library for insertions that increased fatty acid content, we identified 10 high-lipid (HL) mutants for further characterization. These HL mutants exhibited increased sensitivity to drugs that target the bacterial cell envelope and changes in shape, and some had the ability to secrete lipids, with two HL mutants accumulating ~60% of their total lipids extracellularly. When one of the highest-lipid-secreting strains was grown in a fed-batch bioreactor, its lipid content was comparable to that of oleaginous microbes, with the majority of the lipids secreted into the medium. Based on the properties of these HL mutants, we conclude that alterations of the cell envelope are a previously unreported approach to increase microbial lipid production. We also propose that this approach may be combined with knowledge about biosynthetic pathways, in this or other microbes, to increase production of lipids and other chemicals.IMPORTANCE This paper reports on experiments to understand how to increase microbial lipid production. Microbial lipids are often cited as one renewable replacement for petroleum-based fuels and chemicals, but strategies to increase the yield of these compounds are needed to achieve this goal. While lipid biosynthesis is often well understood, increasing yields of these compounds to industrially relevant levels is a challenge, especially since genetic, synthetic biology, or engineering approaches are not feasible in many microbes. We show that altering the bacterial cell envelope can be used to increase microbial lipid production. We also find that the utility of some of these alterations can be enhanced by growing cells in bioreactor configurations that can be used industrially. We propose that our findings can inform current and future efforts to increase production of microbial lipids, other fuels, or chemicals that are currently derived from petroleum.Entities:
Keywords: Rhodobacter; bioreactors; cell envelope; fatty acids; lipid synthesis; two-component regulatory systems
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28536286 PMCID: PMC5442454 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00513-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1 Fatty acid content of parent strain grown at high and low O2 compared to high-lipid (HL) mutants grown at high O2. Data shown represent the means from three or more independent cultures ± standard deviations.
Transposon insertion sites in HL mutants
| Strain | FA inc. (fold) | Insertion site | ORF(s) disrupted, with annotation | Sig. pep. | TM helix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLM01 | 6.7 | Chr1: 1471645 | RSP2839, NtrY sensor signal transduction histidine kinase | No | 5 |
| RSP2840, NtrX response regulator | No | None | |||
| HLM02 | 6.1 | Chr1: 1469665 | RSP2840, NtrX response regulator | No | None |
| HLM03 | 2.7 | Chr2: 274987 | RSP3218, cob(II)yrinic acid a,c-diamide reductase/5,6-dimethylbenzimidazole synthase | No | None |
| HLM04 | 2.7 | Chr1: 2814885 | RSP1056, signal transduction histidine kinase | No | 2 |
| HLM05 | 2.6 | Chr1: 2970757 | RSP1200, uncharacterized conserved protein YkwD | Yes | None |
| HLM06 | 1.8 | Chr2: 938456 | RSP1422, chromosome partitioning protein, ParB family | No | None |
| HLM07 | 1.7 | Chr1: 2086261 | RSP0355, periplasmic serine protease DegP | No | 1 |
| HLM08 | 1.7 | Chr1: 1189239 | RSP2545, stationary-phase survival protein SurE | No | None |
| RSP2544, protein- | No | None | |||
| RSP2543, peptidoglycan | Yes | None | |||
| HLM09 | 1.5 | Chr1: 1395725 | RSP2745, Stealth protein | No | None |
| HLM10 | 1.5 | Chr1: 916649 | RSP2293, ClpA, ATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit | No | None |
Strains are sorted from highest to lowest fold increase in total fatty acid (FA inc.) compared to the parent strain. The presence of a signal peptide (Sig. pep.) was predicted by SignalP 4.1 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/), and the number of predicted transmembrane helixes (TM helix) was determined by TMHMM Server v.2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/).
FIG 2 Chemical sensitivity analysis of HL mutants. Cluster A shows increased sensitivity to a group of compounds that report on membrane integrity (*). Cluster B shows increased sensitivity to a group of peptidoglycan active compounds (**). The color scale indicates relative fitness compared to the parent strain. A value of 1 (black) indicates no change relative to the parent, <1 (blue) indicates increased sensitivity to the compound, and >1 (yellow) indicates increased resistance to the compound. MMS, methyl methanesulfonate.
FIG 3 TEM of whole mounts of the parent strain (A and E) and HL mutants (B to D and F to H). The bottom row of panels (E to H) shows views of extracellular material from these strains. Similar micrographs of the parent strain and other HL mutants are shown in Fig. S2 and S3 in the supplemental material. The arrow in the inset (F) indicates a stacked structure typical of liposomes; bar for this inset panel, 50 nm.
Measurements of cell length and width of Nile red-stained cells by superresolution fluorescence microscopy
| Strain | Length (μm) | Width (μm) | Difference(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 1.72 ± 0.38 | 0.72 ± 0.05 | 75 | |
| HLM01 | 1.70 ± 0.41 | 0.76 ± 0.06* | 259 | Wider |
| HLM02 | 1.68 ± 0.46 | 0.73 ± 0.05 | 205 | |
| HLM03 | 2.32 ± 0.51* | 0.71 ± 0.05 | 91 | Longer |
| HLM04 | 1.22 ± 0.22* | 0.73 ± 0.05 | 148 | Shorter |
| HLM05 | 2.36 ± 0.49* | 0.75 ± 0.06** | 111 | Longer and wider |
| HLM06 | 1.79 ± 0.36 | 0.73 ± 0.06 | 88 | |
| HLM07 | 1.41 ± 0.27* | 0.73 ± 0.06 | 86 | Shorter |
| HLM08 | 1.73 ± 0.33 | 0.67 ± 0.06* | 102 | Narrower |
| HLM09 | 1.83 ± 0.46 | 0.70 ± 0.05** | 126 | Narrower |
| HLM10 | 1.60 ± 0.30*** | 0.74 ± 0.06 | 104 | Shorter |
| Parent with low O2 | 2.27 ± 0.72* | 0.83 ± 0.08* | 83 | Longer and wider |
Measurements are expressed as means ± standard deviations, with n being number of cells measured. Significant differences from the parent strain are indicated as follows: *, P < 0.0001; **, P < 0.002; ***, P < 0.03.
FIG 4 Analysis of the extracellular material of parent and HL mutant strains. (A) Nile red staining of the media from parent and HL mutant cultures. (B) Fatty acid content of parent and HL mutant cultures separated into cell and medium fractions, shown as a stacked bar graph. (C) Percentage of total fatty acids found in the medium fraction for data shown in panel B. (D) Fatty acid content of cell and medium fractions for parent and HLM02 strains compared to HLM02 with a plasmid expressing NtrX (HLM02 + NtrX) and the parent strain with a deletion of ntrY and ntrX (ΔNtrYX), shown as a stacked bar graph. Data shown represent the means from three or more independent cultures ± standard deviations. P values are for the difference of each HL mutant from the parent strain.
FIG 5 Fatty acid production by parent and HLM02 strains in batch cultures with one of four different carbon sources. (A and B) Fatty acid productivity per culture volume (A) and fatty acid content as a percentage of dry cell weight (DCW) (B). For each condition, the cell and medium fractions are stacked. (C) Fatty acid yield per carbon substrate consumed. Data shown represent the means from three or more independent cultures ± standard deviations.
FIG 6 Fed-batch reactor production of fatty acids by HLM02 mutant compared to the parent strain, grown with xylose as a carbon source. (A and B) Total biomass (A) and fatty acid content (B) in the fed-batch reactor. (C) Productivity of fatty acids. (D) Yield of fatty acids per xylose consumed. Data are shown from a representative bioreactor run for each strain; cell and medium fractions are stacked; error bars represent standard deviations between technical replicates.