Ming W Lau1, Christa Gunawan, Bruce E Dale. 1. Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI, USA. lauming@egr.msu.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pretreatment chemistry is of central importance due to its impacts on cellulosic biomass processing and biofuels conversion. Ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) and dilute acid are two promising pretreatments using alkaline and acidic pH that have distinctive differences in pretreatment chemistries. RESULTS: Comparative evaluation on these two pretreatments reveal that (i) AFEX-pretreated corn stover is significantly more fermentable with respect to cell growth and sugar consumption, (ii) both pretreatments can achieve more than 80% of total sugar yield in the enzymatic hydrolysis of washed pretreated solids, and (iii) while AFEX completely preserves plant carbohydrates, dilute acid pretreatment at 5% solids loading degrades 13% of xylose to byproducts. CONCLUSION: The selection of pretreatment will determine the biomass-processing configuration, requirements for hydrolysate conditioning (if any) and fermentation strategy. Through dilute acid pretreatment, the need for hemicellulase in biomass processing is negligible. AFEX-centered cellulosic technology can alleviate fermentation costs through reducing inoculum size and practically eliminating nutrient costs during bioconversion. However, AFEX requires supplemental xylanases as well as cellulase activity. As for long-term sustainability, AFEX has greater potential to diversify products from a cellulosic biorefinery due to lower levels of inhibitor generation and lignin loss.
BACKGROUND: Pretreatment chemistry is of central importance due to its impacts on cellulosic biomass processing and biofuels conversion. Ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) and dilute acid are two promising pretreatments using alkaline and acidic pH that have distinctive differences in pretreatment chemistries. RESULTS: Comparative evaluation on these two pretreatments reveal that (i) AFEX-pretreated corn stover is significantly more fermentable with respect to cell growth and sugar consumption, (ii) both pretreatments can achieve more than 80% of total sugar yield in the enzymatic hydrolysis of washed pretreated solids, and (iii) while AFEX completely preserves plant carbohydrates, dilute acid pretreatment at 5% solids loading degrades 13% of xylose to byproducts. CONCLUSION: The selection of pretreatment will determine the biomass-processing configuration, requirements for hydrolysate conditioning (if any) and fermentation strategy. Through dilute acid pretreatment, the need for hemicellulase in biomass processing is negligible. AFEX-centered cellulosic technology can alleviate fermentation costs through reducing inoculum size and practically eliminating nutrient costs during bioconversion. However, AFEX requires supplemental xylanases as well as cellulase activity. As for long-term sustainability, AFEX has greater potential to diversify products from a cellulosic biorefinery due to lower levels of inhibitor generation and lignin loss.
Authors: Charles E Wyman; Bruce E Dale; Richard T Elander; Mark Holtzapple; Michael R Ladisch; Y Y Lee Journal: Bioresour Technol Date: 2005-02-26 Impact factor: 9.642
Authors: Charles E Wyman; Bruce E Dale; Richard T Elander; Mark Holtzapple; Michael R Ladisch; Y Y Lee Journal: Bioresour Technol Date: 2005-02-25 Impact factor: 9.642
Authors: Alexander E Farrell; Richard J Plevin; Brian T Turner; Andrew D Jones; Michael O'Hare; Daniel M Kammen Journal: Science Date: 2006-01-27 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Bruce S Dien; Eduardo A Ximenes; Patricia J O'Bryan; Mohammed Moniruzzaman; Xin-Liang Li; Venkatesh Balan; Bruce Dale; Michael A Cotta Journal: Bioresour Technol Date: 2007-11-08 Impact factor: 9.642
Authors: Marijke Frederix; Kimmo Hütter; Jessica Leu; Tanveer S Batth; William J Turner; Thomas L Rüegg; Harvey W Blanch; Blake A Simmons; Paul D Adams; Jay D Keasling; Michael P Thelen; Mary J Dunlop; Christopher J Petzold; Aindrila Mukhopadhyay Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dana J Wohlbach; Nikolay Rovinskiy; Jeffrey A Lewis; Maria Sardi; Wendy S Schackwitz; Joel A Martin; Shweta Deshpande; Christopher G Daum; Anna Lipzen; Trey K Sato; Audrey P Gasch Journal: Genome Biol Evol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.416
Authors: Mabel Ting Wong; Dong Zhang; Jun Li; Raymond Kin Hi Hui; Hein Min Tun; Manreetpal Singh Brar; Tae-Jin Park; Yinguang Chen; Frederick C Leung Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 6.040
Authors: Xiaoyu Tang; Leonardo da Costa Sousa; Mingjie Jin; Shishir Ps Chundawat; Charles Kevin Chambliss; Ming W Lau; Zeyi Xiao; Bruce E Dale; Venkatesh Balan Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 6.040
Authors: Mingjie Jin; Cory Sarks; Christa Gunawan; Benjamin D Bice; Shane P Simonett; Ragothaman Avanasi Narasimhan; Laura B Willis; Bruce E Dale; Venkatesh Balan; Trey K Sato Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels Date: 2013-07-27 Impact factor: 6.040