Literature DB >> 28535174

Probabilistic Multiple-Bias Modeling Applied to the Canadian Data From the Interphone Study of Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Glioma, Meningioma, Acoustic Neuroma, and Parotid Gland Tumors.

F Momoli, J Siemiatycki, M L McBride, M-É Parent, L Richardson, D Bedard, R Platt, M Vrijheid, E Cardis, D Krewski.   

Abstract

We undertook a re-analysis of the Canadian data from the 13-country case-control Interphone Study (2001-2004), in which researchers evaluated the associations of mobile phone use with the risks of brain, acoustic neuroma, and parotid gland tumors. In the main publication of the multinational Interphone Study, investigators concluded that biases and errors prevented a causal interpretation. We applied a probabilistic multiple-bias model to address possible biases simultaneously, using validation data from billing records and nonparticipant questionnaires as information on recall error and selective participation. In our modeling, we sought to adjust for these sources of uncertainty and to facilitate interpretation. For glioma, when comparing those in the highest quartile of use (>558 lifetime hours) to those who were not regular users, the odds ratio was 2.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.2, 3.4). After adjustment for selection and recall biases, the odds ratio was 2.2 (95% limits: 1.3, 4.1). There was little evidence of an increase in the risk of meningioma, acoustic neuroma, or parotid gland tumors in relation to mobile phone use. Adjustments for selection and recall biases did not materially affect interpretation in our results from Canadian data.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias; bias modeling; brain tumors; cancer; case-control study; head and neck tumors; mobile phones

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28535174      PMCID: PMC5860390          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  23 in total

1.  THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?

Authors:  A B HILL
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1965-05

2.  Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Analysis of selection bias in a case-control study of renal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M Maclure; S Hankinson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Validation of short term recall of mobile phone use for the Interphone study.

Authors:  M Vrijheid; E Cardis; B K Armstrong; A Auvinen; G Berg; K G Blaasaas; J Brown; M Carroll; A Chetrit; H C Christensen; I Deltour; M Feychting; G G Giles; S J Hepworth; M Hours; I Iavarone; C Johansen; L Klaeboe; P Kurttio; S Lagorio; S Lönn; P A McKinney; L Montestrucq; R C Parslow; L Richardson; S Sadetzki; T Salminen; J Schüz; T Tynes; A Woodward
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Mobile phone use and risk of parotid gland tumor.

Authors:  Stefan Lönn; Anders Ahlbom; Helle C Christensen; Christoffer Johansen; Joachim Schüz; Staffan Edström; Gert Henriksson; Jan Lundgren; Johan Wennerberg; Maria Feychting
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Mobile phone and cordless phone use and the risk for glioma - Analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden, 1997-2003 and 2007-2009.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell; Michael Carlberg
Journal:  Pathophysiology       Date:  2014-10-29

7.  Selection bias due to differential participation in a case-control study of mobile phone use and brain tumors.

Authors:  Anna Lahkola; Tiina Salminen; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 8.  Systematic review of wireless phone use and brain cancer and other head tumors.

Authors:  Michael H Repacholi; Alexander Lerchl; Martin Röösli; Zenon Sienkiewicz; Anssi Auvinen; Jürgen Breckenkamp; Guglielmo d'Inzeo; Paul Elliott; Patrizia Frei; Sabine Heinrich; Isabelle Lagroye; Anna Lahkola; David L McCormick; Silke Thomas; Paolo Vecchia
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.010

9.  Risk of brain tumours in relation to estimated RF dose from mobile phones: results from five Interphone countries.

Authors:  E Cardis; B K Armstrong; J D Bowman; G G Giles; M Hours; D Krewski; M McBride; M E Parent; S Sadetzki; A Woodward; J Brown; A Chetrit; J Figuerola; C Hoffmann; A Jarus-Hakak; L Montestruq; L Nadon; L Richardson; R Villegas; M Vrijheid
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Use of mobile phones and risk of brain tumours: update of Danish cohort study.

Authors:  Patrizia Frei; Aslak H Poulsen; Christoffer Johansen; Jørgen H Olsen; Marianne Steding-Jessen; Joachim Schüz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-19
View more
  11 in total

1.  Genetic susceptibility may modify the association between cell phone use and thyroid cancer: A population-based case-control study in Connecticut.

Authors:  Jiajun Luo; Hang Li; Nicole C Deziel; Huang Huang; Nan Zhao; Shuangge Ma; Xin Ni; Robert Udelsman; Yawei Zhang
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  The Association Between Smartphone Use and Breast Cancer Risk Among Taiwanese Women: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Shih; Chin-Sheng Hung; Cheng-Chiao Huang; Kuei-Ru Chou; Shu-Fen Niu; Sally Chan; Hsiu-Ting Tsai
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Human Health Risk Assessment of 4-12 GHz Radar Waves using CST STUDIO SUITE Software.

Authors:  Farshad Fereidouni; Seyed Taghi Mohammadi; Vahed Faramarzi Shahraki; Farhad Jahantigh
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2022-06-01

4.  Commentary: Geographic Variations in the Incidence of Glioblastoma and Prognostic Factors Predictive of Overall Survival in US Adults from 2004-2013.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 5.  Human‑made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced‑oscillation and voltage‑gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage (Review).

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Andreas Karabarbounis; Igor Yakymenko; George P Chrousos
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 5.650

6.  Time trends in mobile phone use and glioma incidence among males in the Nordic Countries, 1979-2016.

Authors:  Isabelle Deltour; Aslak Harbo Poulsen; Christoffer Johansen; Maria Feychting; Tom Børge Johannesen; Anssi Auvinen; Joachim Schüz
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 13.352

7.  Effect of Smoking on Breast Cancer by Adjusting for Smoking Misclassification Bias and Confounders Using a Probabilistic Bias Analysis Method.

Authors:  Reza Pakzad; Saharnaz Nedjat; Mehdi Yaseri; Hamid Salehiniya; Nasrin Mansournia; Maryam Nazemipour; Mohammad Ali Mansournia
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 8.  Health Council of the Netherlands and evaluation of the fifth generation, 5G, for wireless communication and cancer risks.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-24

9.  Comments on the US National Toxicology Program technical reports on toxicology and carcinogenesis study in rats exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 900 MHz and in mice exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 1,900 MHz.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell; Michael Carlberg
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.650

10.  Reply to Comment on Choi, Y.-J., et al. Cellular Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8079.

Authors:  Seung-Kwon Myung; Joel M Moskowitz; Yoon-Jung Choi; Yun-Chul Hong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.