Ikufumi Takahashi1,2, Taro Matsuzaki3, Masahiro Hoso3. 1. Section of Rehabilitation, Kanazawa University Hospital: 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan. 2. Department of Motor Function Analysis, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan. 3. Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Japan.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study was performed to evaluate the long-term histopathological changes in knee-joint components including synovial membrane and joint capsule in a rat model of osteoarthritis (OA) induced by monosodium iodoacetate (MIA). [Subjects and Methods] Fifty male rats were used. OA was induced through intra-articular injection of MIA, and ten rats were randomly allocated to each of five groups induced with OA for 1, 2, 4, 6, or 8 weeks. At the end of each period, the knee components were examined histopathologically. [Results] After 1 and 2 weeks, chondrocytes were weakly stained. After 4 weeks, fibrillation, fissuring, and eburnation were observed, whereas after 6 weeks, chondrocyte clustering and osteophyte formation were detected. In the synovial membrane, the proliferation of spindle-shaped cells and a multilayered structure of the surface cells were observed at 1 and 2 weeks, but the degree of these changes decreased over time. In the joint capsule, a narrowing of the space between collagen fiber bundles was observed at 4-8 weeks. [Conclusion] The long-term histopathological changes of the joint components observed in a rat model of OA induced by MIA were similar to those detected in OA, but differed at specific times and tissues.
[Purpose] This study was performed to evaluate the long-term histopathological changes in knee-joint components including synovial membrane and joint capsule in a rat model of osteoarthritis (OA) induced by monosodium iodoacetate (MIA). [Subjects and Methods] Fifty male rats were used. OA was induced through intra-articular injection of MIA, and ten rats were randomly allocated to each of five groups induced with OA for 1, 2, 4, 6, or 8 weeks. At the end of each period, the knee components were examined histopathologically. [Results] After 1 and 2 weeks, chondrocytes were weakly stained. After 4 weeks, fibrillation, fissuring, and eburnation were observed, whereas after 6 weeks, chondrocyte clustering and osteophyte formation were detected. In the synovial membrane, the proliferation of spindle-shaped cells and a multilayered structure of the surface cells were observed at 1 and 2 weeks, but the degree of these changes decreased over time. In the joint capsule, a narrowing of the space between collagen fiber bundles was observed at 4-8 weeks. [Conclusion] The long-term histopathological changes of the joint components observed in a rat model of OA induced by MIA were similar to those detected in OA, but differed at specific times and tissues.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of degenerative joint disease and a leading
cause of pain and chronic physical disability in elderly people1). OA presents a multifactorial etiology, and can be
considered the product of interactions between systemic, mechanical, and local factors
within a joint1). It is a chronic disease,
which develops progressively over a span of decades and eventually leads to joint
failure2).Several previous experimental studies have focused on the histopathological changes of the
articular cartilage and subchondral bone in OA. For example, Hayami et al. characterized
subchondral bone remodeling, cartilage damage, and osteophytosis during disease progression
in the anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) model either alone or in combination
with resection of medial menisci3). Janusz
et al. studied the effect of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in mono-iodoacetate
(MIA)-induced arthritis in rats, and reported that MMP inhibitors are partially protective
against cartilage and subchondral bone damage induced by iodoacetate4). Thus, previous studies have typically evaluated the
histopathological changes of articular cartilage and subchondral bone as one interpretation
of the results of treatments. However, in most of these studies, the experimental period was
short (2–4 weeks), and in recent years, only a few basic studies have focused on the
histological natural history in OA over a period of >8 weeks5,6,7,8,9).How joint components other than the articular cartilage and subchondral bone, such as the
synovial membrane and the joint capsule, change histopathologically with OA development is
another question that remains unanswered. Synovitis contributes to OA progression. Scanzello
et al. reported that the low-grade synovitis of OA is associated with increased symptoms
such as pain and degree of joint dysfunction, and might promote rapid cartilage
degeneration10); they further identified
four patterns of OA-associated “synoviopathy”: hyperplastic, fibrotic, detritus-rich, and
inflammatory10). However, the
time-dependent histopathological changes of the synovial membrane remain unreported.
Similarly, the histopathological changes of the joint capsule have not been elucidated thus
far; however, the limitation of the joint range of motion in OA patients is widely
recognized, and in the contracture model developed using joint immobilization, the joint
capsule has been reported to change histopathologically. Matsuzaki et al. reported that the
joint capsule in the immobilization group showed a narrowing of the collagen bundles in
interstitial spaces11), and Watanabe et
al. observed that the thickness of the joint capsule had increased by 4 weeks of
immobilization and progressed with prolongation of the immobilization period12). Based on these factors, the joint capsule
might be considered to change histopathologically in OA, but previous studies have not
described either the histopathological changes of these joint components in OA, or the
mechanism and process of the degeneration of joint components that are accompanied by OA
development.Animal-model systems represent a crucial adjunct and surrogate for studies of OA in humans.
These systems not only provide a means of studying OA pathophysiology, but also aid in the
development of therapeutic agents and biological markers for OA diagnosis and prognosis. The
OA animal models belong to three general categories of in vivo OA models: naturally
occurring OA models (including genetically modified animals); models for the initiation or
acceleration of joint degeneration developed using surgery or other trauma; and models
developed through intra-articular injection of chondrotoxic or proinflammatory
substances2). Among these, the chemical
model presents certain advantages such as high reproducibility and accuracy, mildly invasive
procedures, easy implementation, and most rapidly progressing OA5). In rats, the MIA model is well established, and the induced
OA resembles human degenerative OA in terms of the histological and pain-related
behavior5). MIA is a metabolic inhibitor
that breaks down the cellular aerobic glycolysis pathway and, consequently, induces cell
death by inhibiting the activity of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in
chondrocytes5,6,7,8,9). Intra-articular injection
of MIA leads to a reduction in the number of chondrocytes and subsequent histological and
morphological articular alterations that are similar to the changes in human OA5,6,7,8,9). However, previous research has rarely
focused on the histopathological changes of articular joint components, including the
synovial membrane and the joint capsule, in the MIA-induced OA model. Therefore, in this
study, we investigated the long-term histopathological developments in knee-joint components
by using a rat model of OA induced by MIA.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Fifty male Wistar rats (9 week old, 272.8 ± 8.5 g) were evaluated in this study. The
animals were housed under normal conditions for 1 week before the start of the experiments
in order to acclimatize them to the environment. One or two rats were housed per cage, in a
sanitary ventilated room with controlled temperature, humidity, and a 12/12-h light-dark
cycle, and food and water were provided ad libitum. This investigation was approved by the
Animal Research Committee of the Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa,
Japan (Approval No.153501). All animal care and treatment procedures were performed in
accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals at Kanazawa
University.OA was induced through a single intra-articular injection of MIA as described
previously4, 7,8,9,10). In rats, 1 mg of MIA has
been demonstrated to be the maximal effective dose for inducing OA6). In our pilot study, rats were anesthetized by
intraperitoneally injecting them with 40 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital. The left knees were
shaved and disinfected, and then an incision was made at the center of the knee to expose
the patellar ligament. Each rat was positioned on its back and the left leg was flexed 90°
at the knee. The patellar ligament was palpated below the patella and MIA was injected into
this region; 1 mg of MIA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA; cat no. I2512) was dissolved in sterile
saline and administered in a volume of 50 µl by using a 29-gauge 0.5-inch needle. Care was
taken to ensure that the needle was not advanced too far into the cruciate ligaments.
However, when pulling out the injector, the solution spilled over the capsule. Moreover,
when the left knee was dissected at 1 day post-surgery, the subcutaneous tissue in most rats
was found to be wet (the right knee had no wetness). Therefore, we concluded that the saline
volume was excessive, and, consequently, in the main study, we injected the 50 rats with
1.0 mg of MIA dissolved in 30 µl of saline. When their left knees were subsequently
dissected at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after the MIA administration, the subcutaneous tissue
of the knee was not wet in any of the rats.The five experimental groups contained 10 rats each, which were sacrificed—through
intraperitoneal injection of a lethal dose of sodium pentobarbital—at 1, 2, 4, 6, or 8 weeks
after the MIA administration. Immediately after the animals died, left hind limbs were
disarticulated at the hip joint, and all knees were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin
for 72 h and decalcified using Decalcifying Solution A (7% w/v
AlCl36H2O, 5% formic acid, and 8.5% HCl. Plank-Rychlo Method, Wako
Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) for 72 h. The knees were excised, deacidified
in 5% sodium sulfate solution for 72 h, dehydrated in 100% ethanol after washing with water,
embedded in paraffin wax, and then sectioned coronally (3 μm). These slides were stained
separately with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and 0.05% toluidine blue for 10 min, and
then sequentially dehydrated in 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% ethanol. Finally, sections were
cleared in xylene. For histology, one representative slice was chosen. A light microscope
and a digital camera (BX-51 and DP-50; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) were used to image
and examine the articular cartilage in the medial femorotibial joint, and the synovial
membrane and joint capsule in medial knee compartments. The histopathological features were
evaluated by a single blinded pathologist. The normal and histopathological features in OA
were examined for cell and matrix appearance according to previous studies. Figure 1 shows the normal articular cartilage,
subchondral bone, synovial membrane, and joint capsule samples that were stained with
H&E and toluidine blue for histopathological analysis. Normal articular cartilage and
subchondral bone are composed of a small number of cells (chondrocytes) embedded in an
abundant extracellular matrix13). The
extracellular matrix consists predominantly of type-II collagen, proteoglycans, and water,
together with comparatively smaller amounts of other collagen types and non-collagenous
proteins14). Histologically, the
articular cartilage is divided into 4 zones: the tangential layer, the transitional layer,
the radial layer, and the calcified layer14); these zones are distinguished by the shape of the chondrocytes and
the arrangement of type-II collagen fibers14). A microscopically distinct line—the tidemark—separates the lower
radial zone from the underlying zone of calcified cartilage, and deep inside the calcified
cartilage lies the subchondral bone plate13). In the normal synovial membrane, the synovium is composed of two
layers: an intimal component of 1–3 discontinuous cell layers of synoviocytes (or
synovial-lining cells, which are fibroblasts and macrophages) featuring an incomplete
basement membrane; and an outer subintimal layer that merges with the fibrous joint capsule
and contains nerves, lymphatics, and vasculature15). The normal joint capsule is composed of interlacing bundles of
parallel fibers of collagen, and the capsule is perforated by vessels and nerves13). Similarly, the histopathological features
in OA were examined for cell and matrix appearance according to previous studies11, 12, 16,17,18). For example, the specific features
detected in the articular cartilage are fibrillation, fissuring, and eburnation; in the
synovial membrane, proliferation of spindle-shaped cells and a multilayered structure of the
surface cells; and in joint capsules, infiltration of inflammatory cells and a narrowing of
the space between collagen fiber bundles.
Fig. 1.
Histopathological analysis
of normal joint components Articular cartilage stained with hematoxylin and eosin
(H&E) (A) and toluidine blue (B). H&E staining of synovial membrane (C) and
joint capsule (D). Scale bar=500 µm (A, B) and 50 µm (C, D)
Histopathological analysis
of normal joint components Articular cartilage stained with hematoxylin and eosin
(H&E) (A) and toluidine blue (B). H&E staining of synovial membrane (C) and
joint capsule (D). Scale bar=500 µm (A, B) and 50 µm (C, D)
RESULTS
All animals were conscious and started to move within several hours after the surgery. No
rat showed signs of knee infection or swelling or died during the experimental period. Thus,
the inflammation was macroscopically and microscopically well controlled. The
histopathological features are summarized in Table
1.
Table 1.
Summary of
histopathological developments in knee components
1 wk
2 wk
4 wk
6 wk
8
wk
Articular
cartilage
Weak staining of
chondrocytes
10
10
10
8
9
Weak staining of cartilage matrix by toluidine blue
in tangential zone
8
10
10
7
4
in deep zone
2
0
4
7
4
Chondrocyte
clustering
in loading portion
0
0
0
0
0
in
margin
0
1
0
5
10
Fibrillation
0
1
9
3
4
Fissuring
0
0
9
3
3
Eburnation
0
0
7
5
7
Deformity
0
1
1
2
3
Subchondral bone
Disappearance of tidemark
1
10
9
9
9
Calcification in
subchondral bone
10
10
9
10
10
Vascularization
5
10
6
4
10
Synovial
membrane
Proliferation of
spindle-shaped cells
10
10
10
8
6
Multilayered structure of surface
cells
10
10
9
4
4
Deposition of fibrin
1
0
1
0
0
Infiltration of
inflammatory cells
10
9
8
6
4
Congestion and vasodilatation of
vessels
6
10
8
3
3
Joint capsule
Infiltration of inflammatory cells
10
4
2
1
1
Congestion and
vasodilatation of vessels
8
9
8
9
5
Narrowing of space between collagen fiber
bundles
0
0
1
7
9
Numerals represent the number of
animals.
Numerals represent the number of
animals.In cartilage degeneration (Figs. 2, 3, and
4(A), (B), (C), (E)), in sections
stained with H&E, we detected weak staining of chondrocyte nuclei in the tangential and
transitional layers, and noted nuclear enlargement, disintegration of nuclei, and
differences in nuclear size at 1 week. The extent of these detected changes differed at the
site of the articular cartilage. However, the chondrocytes in the lacuna in the radial layer
had survived without degeneration. In toluidine blue staining, we observed weak staining of
the cartilage matrix from the radial layer to the tangential layer, but a normal degree of
staining was retained in the calcified layer. At 2 weeks, H&E staining yielded results
similar to those obtained after 1 week: chondrocyte nuclei were again weakly stained in the
tangential and transitional layers, and the chondrocytes in the lacuna in the radial layer
had survived without degeneration, but chondrocyte clusters were not observed. By contrast,
toluidine blue staining of the cartilage matrix was weaker after 2 weeks than after 1 week.
At 4 weeks, H&E staining revealed fibrillation, fissuring, and eburnation in the loading
portion. Moreover, weak staining of chondrocyte nuclei was observed in the tangential and
transitional layers, and chondrocyte clusters were not detected. In toluidine blue staining,
no staining of the cartilage matrix was observed from the radial layer to the tangential
layer, but a normal degree of staining was retained in the calcified layer. At 6 weeks,
H&E staining revealed, as at 4 weeks, fibrillation, fissuring, and eburnation in the
loading portion. In toluidine blue staining, in certain specimens, chondrocyte clusters in
osteophytes were observed in the margin of the articular cartilage. However, no stained
cartilage matrix was observed from the radial layer to the tangential layer in the loading
portion. At 8 weeks, eburnation in the entire loading portion and joint deformity were
observed. The cartilage matrix had disappeared: no staining of the cartilage matrix was
detected in any of the layers in toluidine blue staining. In all specimens, chondrocyte
clusters and osteophytes were observed in the margin of the articular cartilage.
Fig. 2.
Histopathological (H&E) staining of
coronal sections of the medial femorotibial joint Scale bar=500
µm
Fig.
3.
Histopathological (toluidine blue) staining of coronal sections of
the medial femorotibial joint. Scale bar=500 µm
Fig. 4.
Representative
histopathological features of the articular cartilage The panels show weak staining of
chondrocytes (A; black arrows), fibrillation and fissuring (B), eburnation (C),
vascularization into the articular cartilage (D; white arrows), and osteophyte
formation (E). Scale bar=50 µm (A), 200 µm (B, C, D), and 500 µm
(E)
Histopathological (H&E) staining of
coronal sections of the medial femorotibial joint Scale bar=500
µmHistopathological (toluidine blue) staining of coronal sections of
the medial femorotibial joint. Scale bar=500 µmRepresentative
histopathological features of the articular cartilage The panels show weak staining of
chondrocytes (A; black arrows), fibrillation and fissuring (B), eburnation (C),
vascularization into the articular cartilage (D; white arrows), and osteophyte
formation (E). Scale bar=50 µm (A), 200 µm (B, C, D), and 500 µm
(E)In subchondral bone degeneration (Figs. 2, 3, and
4(D)), the area of the calcified layer had increased, and thus the integration of the
structure and the layers was disturbed at 1 week. Moreover, vascularization into the
calcified layer was observed. At 2 weeks, a portion of the tidemark had disappeared, and the
expansion and vascularization of the calcified layer were also observed. After 4 weeks,
together with the fissuring and eburnation of the articular cartilage, the cartilage matrix
and the tidemark had disappeared, and expansion and vascularization of the calcified layer
were observed continuously over the experimental time course.In synovial membrane inflammation (Fig. 5), we
observed the proliferation of spindle-shaped cells in the surface layer of the synovial
membrane and a multilayered structure of the surface cells at 1 week. Furthermore, possible
mild infiltration of inflammatory cells was detected, and congestion and vasodilatation of
vessels were also observed. At 2–4 weeks, as at 1 week, we observed the proliferation of
spindle-shaped cells, the multilayered structure of the surface cells, the possible mild
infiltration of inflammatory cells, and the congestion and vasodilatation of vessels;
however, examination after 6 and 8 weeks revealed that the degree of all of these observed
changes had decreased over the experimental time course.
Fig.
5.
Histopathological (H&E) staining of the synovial membrane From
1 to 4 weeks, proliferation of spindle-shaped cells in the surface layer and a
multilayered structure of the surface cells were observed (black arrows). Moreover,
possible mild infiltration of inflammatory cells was detected (white arrows). Scale
bar=50 µm
Histopathological (H&E) staining of the synovial membrane From
1 to 4 weeks, proliferation of spindle-shaped cells in the surface layer and a
multilayered structure of the surface cells were observed (black arrows). Moreover,
possible mild infiltration of inflammatory cells was detected (white arrows). Scale
bar=50 µmIn joint capsule (Fig. 6), congestion and vasodilatation of vessels
were detected after 1 week and lasted continuously up to 8 weeks. Conversely, although
possible mild infiltration of inflammatory cells was observed after 1 week, this decreased
over time and had almost disappeared after 4 weeks. At 4 weeks, a narrowing of the space
between collagen fiber bundles was observed, and at 6 and 8 weeks, the degree of the
narrowing had increased further.
Fig.
6.
Histopathological (H&E) staining of the joint capsule A
narrowing of the space between collagen fiber bundles was observed at 4 weeks. At 6
and 8 weeks, the degree of this narrowing of the space in the joint capsule had
increased (black arrows). Scale bar=50 µm
Histopathological (H&E) staining of the joint capsule A
narrowing of the space between collagen fiber bundles was observed at 4 weeks. At 6
and 8 weeks, the degree of this narrowing of the space in the joint capsule had
increased (black arrows). Scale bar=50 µm
DISCUSSION
The rat model of OA induced by MIA is a well-established, widely used model. Guzman et al.
created this MIA-induced OA rat model and described the histopathology in the subchondral
bone and cartilage8), and reported that the
early time points were characterized by areas of chondrocyte degeneration and necrosis that
occasionally involved the entire thickness of the articular cartilage8). They concluded that intra-articular injection of MIA
induces a loss of the articular cartilage with the progression of subchondral bone lesions,
and further that this model offers a rapid and minimally invasive method to reproduce
OA-like lesions in a rodent species8). In
our study, the histopathological change of weak chondrocyte staining that we observed after
1 and 2 weeks was similar to the results of the previous study, and the results obtained
here after 6 weeks showed typical OA changes, such as fibrillation, fissuring, eburnation,
calcification of the subchondral bone, and osteophyte formation, which again supported the
previous study results.At all experimental time points in this study, weak staining of chondrocyte nuclei was
observed in the tangential and transitional layers, and nuclear enlargement, disintegration
of nuclei, and differences in nuclear size were detected unaccompanied by inflammatory cell
infiltration. This finding could potentially suggest chondrocyte necrosis or apoptosis. In
previous studies, chondrocyte death in OA was reported to occur due to apoptosis and
necrosis19, 20). Moreover, Jiang et al. reported that MIA-induced apoptosis in
primary rat chondrocytes occurred primarily through reactive oxygen species production and
mitochondria-mediated caspase-3 activation6). However, in this study, the observed histopathological changes of
chondrocytes did not indicate either necrosis or apoptosis. Moreover, we observed a
disappearance of the tidemark accompanied by vascularization into the articular cartilage in
the early phase and a delay of osteophyte formation, and these findings also differed from
those of the previous studies. Guzman et al. reported that calcification of the subchondral
bone was observed at 56 days8).
Chondrocytes produce inhibitors of angiogenesis, such as tissue inhibitor of
metalloproteinase21, 22). Angiogenesis, mediated by the action of vascular
endothelial growth factor, is known to be a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of
OA23). The angiogenesis inhibitors
prevent vessels from penetrating the articular cartilage, but in OA, angiogenesis from the
subchondral bone was reported to breach the tidemark and enter into the articular
cartilage22). Thus, a reduction in the
production of angiogenesis inhibitor due to metabolism deterioration in chondrocytes might
result in the penetration of the articular cartilage by vessels from the subchondral bone,
and the tidemark might disappear in conjunction with the calcification of the subchondral
bone.In this study, we found that osteophyte formation occurred at a later time than reported in
previous studies. In surgical OA models such as the ACLT model, the osteophyte forms more
quickly than in chemical models such as the MIA model. A few previous studies conducted
using surgical OA models reported that the osteophyte forms within a few days to a few weeks
after surgical interventions such as ACLT24,25,26,27). By contrast, Ferland et al. reported that
osteophyte formation was observed at 28 days in a rat model of OA induced by MIA26), and in this study, we detected osteophyte
formation at 6–8 weeks after MIA administration. Several studies have described the
mechanism of osteophyte formation. The osteoblasts, chondrocytes, fibroblasts, synovial
cells, and mesenchymal stem cells that are present in the periosteum are all involved in
osteophyte formation28, 29), a process that is regulated by numerous growth factors
and cytokines, such as transforming growth factor-β and bone morphogenetic protein secreted
by chondrocytes and synovial cells28, 29). Therefore, MIA administration might
affect these regulatory mechanisms and thereby lead to the delay of osteophyte
formation.The time-dependent histopathological changes of the synovial membrane and joint capsule
described here are new observations. In the synovial membrane, the histopathological
features typically observed in OA are synovial lining hyperplasia, villous hyperplasia,
fibrosis, and perivascular mononuclear cell infiltration10, 30, 31). However, in the case of the joint capsule, the features that
develop in OA have not been previously elucidated. In this study, we observed inflammatory
cell infiltration, hyperplasia of spindle-shaped cells, a multilayered structure of surface
cells, angiogenesis, congestion and vasodilatation of vessels, and a narrowing of the space
between collagen fiber bundles, and all of these histopathological changes—except for the
narrowing of the space between collagen fiber bundles—became progressively milder over time.
We suggest that these histopathological changes represent a response to the tissue
impairment induced by MIA toxicity. According to the Globally Harmonized System of
Classification and Labeling of Chemicals32), MIA produces acute toxicity, and this toxicity is considered to
induce a tissue response.In this study, we obtained three intriguing and noteworthy results: one, in the early phase
(i.e., at 1 week after surgery), the degree of toluidine blue staining of the cartilage
matrix was decreased. Two, although most of the chondrocytes underwent degeneration over
time, chondrocytes were regenerated as their clusters formed in the osteophyte at 6–8 weeks
after surgery (Fig. 4 (E)). Chondrocytes were
previously reported to exhibit poor regeneration potential13, 14), but the findings of
this study suggest that chondrocyte metabolism is not slow and that chondrocytes can present
a certain level of regeneration potential in specific situations. Three, the appearance of
cartilage regeneration in the loading portion was distinct from that in the margin of the
cartilage: cartilage in the loading portion appeared necrotic, and chondrocyte regeneration
and clustering were not observed; by contrast, in the cartilage margin, chondrocyte
clustering, regeneration of chondrocytes and the cartilage matrix, and osteophyte formation
were observed. This finding suggests that mechanical stress—such as loading—might influence
cartilage destruction and that the periosteum and the synovial membrane near the margin of
the articular cartilage affect cartilage regeneration.One limitation of this study is that, while we performed a detailed histopathological
analysis of the joint component changes, we did not evaluate them quantitatively using a
histological scale for cartilage degeneration and a morphological measurement for the space
between collagen fibers in the joint capsule. Further study is needed to provide a detailed
quantitative evaluation.In conclusion, overall, the histopathological changes of the joint components observed here
in a rat model of OA induced by MIA were similar to those detected in OA, but differed at
specific times and tissues. The MIA-induced OA rat model was previously reported to
represent an artificial model developed using a chemical agent, and the model was reported
to be distinct in certain aspects from the naturally occurring OA model2, 5, 16). However, when selected appropriately, a rat model of OA
induced by MIA can serve as a highly favorable model because it offers high reproducibility
and accuracy, and involves only mildly invasive procedures. Further investigation is
required to clarify the histopathological changes in OA to determine the potential of
cartilage regeneration and the influence of mechanical stress on cartilage repair.
Author contributions
All authors have made substantial contributions to (1) the conception and design of the
study, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; (2) drafting the
article or critically revising it for important intellectual content; and (3) final
approval of the submitted version of the manuscript.The specific contributions of the authors are as follows:(1) Conception and design of the study: IT, TM, and MH.(2) Analysis and interpretation of the data: IT, TM, and MH.(3) Drafting of the article: IT, TM, and MH.(4) Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: IT and MH.(5) Final approval of the article: IT, TM, and MH.(6) Obtaining funding: TM and MH.(7) Collection and assembly of data: IT and TM.
Funding
This work was supported by university and departmental funding sources.
Conflicts of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the
content and writing of the papers.
Authors: Pierre Mainil-Varlet; Thomas Aigner; Mats Brittberg; Peter Bullough; Anthony Hollander; Ernst Hunziker; Rita Kandel; Stefan Nehrer; Kenneth Pritzker; Sally Roberts; Edouard Stauffer Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2003 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: T Aigner; J L Cook; N Gerwin; S S Glasson; S Laverty; C B Little; W McIlwraith; V B Kraus Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: M J Janusz; E B Hookfin; S A Heitmeyer; J F Woessner; A J Freemont; J A Hoyland; K K Brown; L C Hsieh; N G Almstead; B De; M G Natchus; S Pikul; Y O Taiwo Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: K P H Pritzker; S Gay; S A Jimenez; K Ostergaard; J-P Pelletier; P A Revell; D Salter; W B van den Berg Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2005-10-19 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Hagar B Abo-Zalam; Rania M Abdelsalam; Rehab F Abdel-Rahman; Mohamed F Abd-Ellah; Mahmoud M Khattab Journal: Molecules Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 4.411