| Literature DB >> 28533239 |
Grennady Wirjanata1, Irene Handayuni1, Pak Prayoga2, Leo Leonardo2, Dwi Apriyanti3, Leily Trianty3, Ruland Wandosa2, Basbak Gobay2, Enny Kenangalem2,4, Jeanne Rini Poespoprodjo2,4,5, Rintis Noviyanti3, Dennis E Kyle6, Qin Cheng7,8, Ric N Price1,9, Jutta Marfurt10.
Abstract
High-grade chloroquine (CQ) resistance has emerged in both Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax The aim of the present study was to investigate the phenotypic differences of CQ resistance in both of these species and the ability of known CQ resistance reversal agents (CQRRAs) to alter CQ susceptibility. Between April 2015 and April 2016, the potential of verapamil (VP), mibefradil (MF), L703,606 (L7), and primaquine (PQ) to reverse CQ resistance was assessed in 46 P. falciparum and 34 P. vivax clinical isolates in Papua, Indonesia, where CQ resistance is present in both species, using a modified schizont maturation assay. In P. falciparum, CQ 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) were reduced when CQ was combined with VP (1.4-fold), MF (1.2-fold), L7 (4.2-fold), or PQ (1.8-fold). The degree of CQ resistance reversal in P. falciparum was highly correlated with CQ susceptibility for all CQRRAs (R2 = 0.951, 0.852, 0.962, and 0.901 for VP, MF, L7, and PQ, respectively), in line with observations in P. falciparum laboratory strains. In contrast, no reduction in the CQ IC50s was observed with any of the CQRRAs in P. vivax, even in those isolates with high chloroquine IC50s. The differential effect of CQRRAs in P. falciparum and P. vivax suggests significant differences in CQ kinetics and, potentially, the likely mechanism of CQ resistance between these two species. © Crown copyright 2017.Entities:
Keywords: Plasmodium falciparum; Plasmodium vivax; chloroquine; chloroquine resistance reversal; drug resistance; malaria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28533239 PMCID: PMC5527611 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00355-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
Baseline characteristics of isolates for which ex vivo assays were performed
| Baseline characteristic | ||
|---|---|---|
| No. (%) of isolates reaching harvest | 37 (80) | 20 (59) |
| Median (range) delay from venipuncture to start of culture (min) | 150 (65–310) | 175 (100–330) |
| Median (range) duration of assay (h) | 43 (35–46) | 45 (42–50) |
| Geometric mean (95% CI | 21,017 (13,955–31,652) | 8,555 (5,656–12,940) |
| Median (range) initial % parasites at ring stage | 100 | 93 (76–97) |
| Mean (95% CI) % schizonts at harvest | 52 (47–56) | 46 (42–49) |
CI, confidence interval.
Ex vivo drug susceptibility of P. falciparum laboratory strains to CQ and CQRRAs
| Drug or drug combination | FC27 | 3D7 | K1 | W2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (range) IC50 (nM) | Fold change | Median (range) IC50 (nM) | Fold change | Median (range) IC50 (nM) | Fold change | Median (range) IC50 (nM) | Fold change | |
| VP | 27,270 (10,280–34.430) | 13,640 (13,630–18,380) | 28,530 (13,930–48.570) | 6,490 (5,820–6,530) | ||||
| MF | 8,962 (8,614–9,774) | 3,820 (3,760–3,920) | 1,544 (1,309–1,699) | 2,600 (2,540–2,610) | ||||
| L7 | 12,810 (11,860–24,350) | 8,550 (8,430–10,150) | 6,466 (5,098–12,372) | 5,400 (5,280–5,670) | ||||
| PQ | NA | NA | 9,599 | 14,442 | ||||
| CQ | 9.3 (8.5–10.8) | 6.7 (6.6–7.8) | 138.9 (116.9–150.2) | 174.6 (173.6–181.0) | ||||
| CQV (1 μM) | 12.8 (11.9–24.3) | 0.73 | 7.3 (6.7–7.6) | 0.92 | 24.6 (20.9–33.1) | 5.65 | 14.6 (14.5–20.2) | 11.96 |
| CQM (0.35 μM) | 12.1 (11.2–13.9) | 0.77 | 7.8 (6.9–7.9) | 0.86 | 21.9 (14.0–39.3) | 6.34 | 22.9 (22.1–23.7) | 7.62 |
| CQL (1.5 μM) | 10.8 (10.6–14.9) | 0.86 | 6.9 (6.7–7.6) | 0.97 | 27.2 (14.9–41.9) | 5.11 | 7.7 (7.3–8.2) | 22.68 |
| CQPQ (0.5 μM) | 7.7 (7.1–7.7) | 1.21 | 11.9 (10.0–20.8) | 0.56 | 86.8 (81.0–96.8) | 1.6 | 120.0 (118.6–138.0) | 1.46 |
A chloroquine-sensitive laboratory strain.
A chloroquine-resistant laboratory strain.
Data are derived from three independent experiments unless indicated otherwise.
Fold change of the median CQ-CQRRA IC50 from the CQ IC50.
Derived from one experiment only.
NA, not tested in this strain.
Ex vivo drug susceptibility of P. falciparum and P. vivax field isolates to CQ and CQRRAs
| Drug | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 | IC90 | IC50 | IC90 | |||||
| Median (range) IC50 (nM) | Median (range) IC50 (nM) | Median (range) IC50 (nM) | Median (range) IC50 (nM) | |||||
| CQ | 93.5 (14.4–427.7) | 154.4 (17.9–747.2) | 51.2 (7.0–118.0) | 84.1 (56.3–254.2) | ||||
| CQV (1 μM) | 67.1 (4.9–139.0) | 0.001 | 133.6 (40.1–296.0) | 0.006 | 85.2 (10.3–286.6) | 0.026 | 170.6 (52.9–409.9) | 0.022 |
| CQM (0.35 μM) | 77.4 (8.7–190.7) | <0.001 | 135.9 (34.3–312.8) | 0.004 | 72.7 (14.9–193.8) | 0.033 | 156.1 (53.3–404.2) | 0.007 |
| CQL (1.5 μM) | 22.5 (2.8–102.0) | <0.001 | 53.2 (3.5–154.6) | <0.001 | 58.6 (18.6–237.6) | 0.596 | 129.8 (41.4–407.2) | 0.133 |
| CQPQ (0.5 μM) | 50.8 (3.1–127.0) | <0.001 | 112.3 (39.2–268.1) | 0.005 | 54.9 (2.6–102.5) | 0.268 | 93.9 (15.9–232.7 | 0.542 |
P values (determined by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test) denote the statistical significance of the difference in median IC50s between CQ-CQRRA and CQ.
FIG 1Ex vivo drug susceptibility of clinical P. falciparum (left) and P. vivax (right) field isolates. Numbers represent median IC50s (in nanomolar) (A and B) and IC90s (in nanomolar) (C and D), and error bars represent the interquartile range (IQR). P values were derived by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
FIG 2Polynomial regression analysis between ΔIC50 (the CQ IC50 minus the CQ-CQRRA IC50) and the CQ IC50. Data were analyzed using a third-order polynomial regression model. The vertical dotted lines denote the inflection point of the CQ IC50 in P. falciparum and the corresponding concentration in P. vivax. In P. vivax, the data failed to fit a polynomial regression model of any order. R2 values represent the coefficients of determination.