Literature DB >> 28532932

Intereye comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery capsulotomy and manual capsulorhexis edge strength.

Thomas Chan1, Ushasree Pattamatta1, Mark Butlin1, Kerrie Meades1, Chandra Bala2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the breaking force required to tear the explanted capsule after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in the worse eye and manual cataract surgery in the contralateral eye.
SETTING: Personaleyes, Sydney, Australia.
DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized case study.
METHOD: Patients with bilateral cataract had femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with the Lensx laser in the eye with worse vision and manual cataract surgery in the contralateral eye. Each explanted capsule was stretched mechanically, and the breaking force and strain in grams (g) were compared. When a large contralateral difference in capsule strength was found, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was applied to determine whether morphologic imperfections were present in a case with a weak capsule.
RESULTS: Paired samples of 78 eyes of 39 patients were tested. The mean breaking force was not significantly different between manual capsulorhexes (2.3 g ± 2.0 [SD]) and femtosecond laser capsulotomies (2.0 ± 2.2 g, P = .52). The breaking strain for the manual samples (33.8% ± 18.3%) and for the femtosecond laser samples (34.6% ± 18.6%) were also not significantly different (P = .81). In 5 patients, in the femtosecond group, the capsules required considerably less force to break than the capsules in the manual group. However, the SEM images of these samples did not show specific laser imperfections.
CONCLUSION: In paired human eyes, the capsulotomies created by a femtosecond laser with a contact lens interface were as strong as manual capsulorhexes.
Copyright © 2017 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28532932     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Precision pulse capsulotomy : The new capsulorhexis?]

Authors:  M D Becker; S Michels; S Lortz; S Kaminski
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Comparison of diathermic high-frequency capsulorhexis and continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis in white cataract surgery.

Authors:  Li Wang; Peng Li; Xiong Guo
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Anterior Capsule of the Lens: Comparison of Morphological Properties and Apoptosis Induction following FLACS and Standard Phacoemulsification Surgery.

Authors:  Alessandra Pisciotta; Michele De Maria; Tommaso Verdina; Elisa Fornasari; Anto de Pol; Gian Maria Cavallini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.