| Literature DB >> 28531221 |
Lele Ren1, Xin Li2, Lihong Kang3, Katherine Brunson4, Honggao Liu1,5, Weimiao Dong6, Haiming Li1, Rui Min3, Xu Liu3, Guanghui Dong1.
Abstract
Reconstructing ancient diets and the use of animals and plants augment our understanding of how humans adapted to different environments. Yunnan Province in southwest China is ecologically and environmentally diverse. During the Neolithic and Bronze Age periods, this region was occupied by a variety of local culture groups with diverse subsistence systems and material culture. In this paper, we obtained carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotopic ratios from human and faunal remains in order to reconstruct human paleodiets and strategies for animal exploitation at the Bronze Age site of Shilinggang (ca. 2500 Cal BP) in northwest Yunnan Province. The δ13C results for human samples from Shilinggang demonstrate that people's diets were mainly dominated by C3-based foodstuffs, probably due to both direct consumption of C3 food and as a result of C3 foddering of consumed animals. Auxiliary C4 food signals can also be detected. High δ15N values indicate that meat was an important component of the diet. Analysis of faunal samples indicates that people primarily fed pigs and dogs with human food waste, while sheep/goats and cattle were foddered with other food sources. We compare stable isotope and archaeobotanical data from Shilinggang with data from other Bronze Age sites in Yunnan to explore potential regional variation in subsistence strategies. Our work suggests that people adopted different animal utilization and subsistence strategies in different parts of Yunnan during the Bronze Age period, probably as local adaptations to the highly diversified and isolated environments in the region.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28531221 PMCID: PMC5439680 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177867
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The location of Shilinggang and other sites mentioned in the text.
DEM (digital elevation model) data was downloaded from Geospatial Data Cloud (http://www.gscloud.cn/), and map features in the figure were modified from Li et al. [28].
Fig 2Plan map of northern Shilinggang and stratigraphic column from unit TN6W3.
a) Plan map of the northern part of Shilinggang. Rectangular excavation units are labeled starting with the letter T. Features include burials (labeled with the letter “M”), pits (labeled with the letter “H”), and building foundations (labeled with the letter “F”). The features shown in Fig 2a are modified from Li et al. [28]. b) Photograph of stratigraphic profile in unit TN6W3 (center right of plan map in Fig 2a). Circles around numbers indicate stratigraphic levels.
Isotopic composition and quality indicators of animal samples from Shilinggang, Yunnan.
Samples marked in bold italics were found to be contaminated, and were not included in further statistical analysis. Context locations are shown in Fig 2a. Among the sample context codes, TNnWn (where n is an Arabic numeral) refers to excavation unit; circles with a number inside refer to the stratigraphic layer.
| Species | Skeletal element | Symmetry | Code | Sample context | %Yield | %C | %N | C/N ratio | δ13C (‰) | δ15N (‰) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goat | Metatarsal | Left | 21 | TN6W2⑤ | 1.9 | 43.8 | 15.6 | 3.3 | -15.4 | 3.3 |
| Sheep | Humerus | Left | 22 | TN6W7② | 19.7 | 41.7 | 14.4 | 3.4 | -21.6 | 4.5 |
| Goat | Humerus | Left | 23 | TN6W5⑤ | 16.7 | 43.1 | 15.1 | 3.3 | -9.6 | 3.6 |
| Sheep/goats | Humerus | Left | 24 | TN6W5⑥ | 2.2 | 42.8 | 15.3 | 3.3 | -22.9 | 4.9 |
| Goat | Radius | Left | 27 | TN6W2⑤ | 1.7 | 42.2 | 14.8 | 3.3 | -21.6 | 7.3 |
| Sheep/goats | PhalanxI | Left | 28 | TN7W4③ | 13.6 | 43.5 | 15.5 | 3.3 | -22.4 | 5.0 |
| Sheep/goats | Mandible | Left | 29 | TN6W5④ | 4.8 | 43.2 | 15.4 | 3.3 | -10.3 | 3.0 |
| Sheep/goats | Tibia | Left | 31 | TN6W6 | 5.0 | 43.7 | 15.4 | 3.3 | -23.0 | 4.0 |
| Goat | PhalanxI | Left | 32 | TN6W2③ | 4.1 | 43.6 | 15.2 | 3.3 | -21.5 | 6.1 |
| Sheep/goats | PhalanxI | Left | 33 | TN6W5 M20 | 1.0 | 38.3 | 13.6 | 3.3 | -22.6 | 7.1 |
| Cattle | Metacarpal | Left | 34 | TN7W4③ | 7.6 | 42.7 | 15.0 | 3.3 | -23.6 | 5.6 |
| Cattle | Radius | Left | 36 | TN6W2⑤ | 2.6 | 42.0 | 14.8 | 3.3 | -22.9 | 6.2 |
| Cattle | Metacarpal | Left | 37 | TN6W6 | 3.7 | 42.2 | 14.8 | 3.3 | -17.9 | 4.3 |
| Cattle | Metatarsal | Left | 38 | TN6W3⑤ | 2.9 | 43.5 | 15.5 | 3.3 | -13.2 | 4.5 |
| Cattle | Metacarpal | Left | 39 | TN7W4② | 2.4 | 44.1 | 15.7 | 3.3 | -14.2 | 4.6 |
| Cattle | Metacarpal | Left | 40 | TN6W7① | 2.9 | 40.9 | 14.1 | 3.4 | -22.8 | 3.7 |
| Cattle | Metatarsal | Left | 42 | TN6W7② | 6.3 | 43.4 | 15.3 | 3.3 | -17.6 | 4.9 |
| Cattle | Metacarpal | Left | 44 | TN6W3③ | 8.7 | 44.2 | 15.7 | 3.3 | -13.5 | 5.1 |
| Cattle | PhalanxI | Left | 45 | TN6W3⑥ | 6.1 | 42.7 | 15.1 | 3.3 | -16.9 | 4.6 |
| Cattle | PhalanxII | Left | 46 | TN7W4⑤ | 4.9 | 42.8 | 15.1 | 3.3 | -11.2 | 3.4 |
| Muntjac | Metacarpal | Left | 62 | TN6W5③ | 5.0 | 42.7 | 15.6 | 3.2 | -21.3 | 5.6 |
| Muntjac | Radius | Left | 63 | TN7W4⑤ | 4.7 | 44.0 | 15.5 | 3.3 | -25.9 | 4.4 |
| Muntjac | Radius | Left | 64 | TN6W6 | 1.4 | 41.1 | 13.3 | 3.6 | -22.1 | 5.4 |
| Muntjac | Humerus | Left | 65 | TN6W6 | 5.3 | 42.2 | 14.7 | 3.4 | -21.7 | 5.4 |
| Muntjac | Metacarpal | Left | 66 | TN6W5⑥ | 7.7 | 43.4 | 15.4 | 3.3 | -21.3 | 5.4 |
| Muntjac | Radius | Left | 67 | TN6W7② | 2.0 | 42.9 | 15.1 | 3.3 | -22.4 | 4.8 |
| Muntjac | Humerus | Left | 68 | TN6W7 | 4.6 | 43.8 | 15.6 | 3.3 | -21.8 | 6.4 |
| Muntjac | Tibia | Left | 69 | TN6W5⑤ | 8.3 | 43.1 | 15.3 | 3.3 | -22.6 | 5.1 |
| Muntjac | Metatarsal | Left | 71 | TN7W4② | 2.5 | 44.3 | 15.6 | 3.3 | -21.9 | 4.3 |
| Muntjac | Tibia | Left | 72 | TN6W3⑤ | 6.3 | 43.9 | 15.7 | 3.3 | -21.4 | 5.5 |
| Muntjac | Tibia | Left | 73 | TN6W7① | 2.1 | 43.2 | 15.3 | 3.3 | -21.9 | 5.7 |
| Muntjac | Radius | Left | 76 | TN6W6⑥ | 3.2 | 43.4 | 15.4 | 3.3 | -22.5 | 7.0 |
| Deer | Metacarpal | Left | 77 | TN6W3⑥ | 9.8 | 43.6 | 15.7 | 3.2 | -24.5 | 4.1 |
| Deer | Metatarsal | Left | 78 | TN6W2⑤ | 3.4 | 42.1 | 14.9 | 3.3 | -22.6 | 5.8 |
| Deer | Metatarsal | Left | 79 | TN6W3③ | 1.9 | 32.8 | 11.7 | 3.3 | -24.2 | 4.9 |
| Deer | Metatarsal | Left | 80 | TN6W5② | 6.3 | 43.6 | 15.5 | 3.3 | -23.4 | 4.2 |
| Deer | Metacarpal | Left | 81 | TN6W2⑦ | 1.4 | 43.3 | 15.2 | 3.3 | -23.6 | 4.7 |
| Deer | Metacarpal | Left | 82 | TN6W2③ | 8.1 | 43.9 | 15.8 | 3.2 | -19.9 | 5.1 |
| Deer | PhalanxII | Left | 83 | TN6W6 | 5.0 | 43.7 | 15.6 | 3.3 | -23.1 | 4.8 |
| Old World monkey | Femur | Left | 84 | TN6W2③ | 6.0 | 44.2 | 15.3 | 3.4 | -18.9 | 8.0 |
| Old World monkey | Ulna | Left | 85 | TN6W7① | 2.1 | 44.0 | 15.5 | 3.3 | -18.8 | 10.6 |
| Dog | Radius | Left | 13 | TN7W2③ | 3.8 | 43.0 | 15.3 | 3.3 | -20.5 | 8.0 |
| Dog | Femur | Left | 14 | TN6W6 | 4.5 | 43.3 | 15.5 | 3.3 | -14.8 | 7.4 |
| Dog | Radius | Left | 17 | TN5W2② | 3.2 | 43.3 | 15.5 | 3.3 | -18.9 | 8.4 |
| Dog | Humerus | Left | 18 | TN7W4② | 6.8 | 42.4 | 15.1 | 3.3 | -18.9 | 7.4 |
| Pig | Ulna | Left | 49 | TN7W2① | 5.6 | 43.0 | 15.1 | 3.3 | -20.1 | 8.2 |
| Pig | Humerus | Left | 50 | TN5W2② | 3.3 | 43.1 | 14.8 | 3.4 | -20.1 | 8.8 |
| Pig | PhalanxI | Left | 51 | TN6W6⑥ | 2.4 | 43.5 | 15.2 | 3.3 | -22.7 | 3.6 |
| Pig | Scapula | Left | 52 | TN6W5③ | 1.7 | 42.8 | 14.9 | 3.4 | -15.9 | 6.6 |
| Pig | Metatarsal | Left | 53 | TN6W3⑥ | 2.5 | 42.9 | 15.7 | 3.2 | -18.5 | 6.3 |
| Pig | Radius | Left | 54 | TN6W2③ | 4.8 | 41.9 | 15.1 | 3.2 | -20.4 | 8.8 |
| Pig | Humerus | Left | 55 | TN6W3② | 1.9 | 41.4 | 14.7 | 3.3 | -20.3 | 8.7 |
| Pig | Ulna | Left | 56 | TN6W6⑤ | 4.4 | 38.9 | 13.7 | 3.3 | -20.8 | 5.8 |
| Pig | Radius | Left | 57 | TN6W7② | 1.4 | 42.8 | 15.5 | 3.2 | -20.6 | 5.0 |
| Pig | Ulna | Left | 58 | TN6W7① | 3.4 | 42.0 | 15.1 | 3.2 | -19.5 | 8.3 |
| Pig | Radius | Left | 59 | TN7W4⑤ | 1.4 | 40.1 | 14.7 | 3.2 | -21.0 | 4.8 |
| Pig | Humerus | Left | 60 | TN6W3⑤ | 3.5 | 41.5 | 15.0 | 3.2 | -17.5 | 6.7 |
| Pig | PhalanxII | Left | 61 | TN6W6 | 2.0 | 41.0 | 15.1 | 3.2 | -20.8 | 4.8 |
Isotopic composition and quality indicators of human samples from Shilinggang, Yunnan.
The samples marked in bold italics were found to be contaminated, and were not included in further statistical analysis. Context locations are shown in Fig 2a. Among the sample context codes, TNnWn (where n is an Arabic numeral) refers to excavation unit; Mn (where n is an Arabic numeral) refers to the grave number. “Ind.” stands for indeterminate sex.
| Age (years) | Sex | Skeletal element | Symmetry | Code | Sample context | %Yield | %C | %N | C/N ratio | δ13C (‰) | δ15N (‰) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult | Female | PhalanxI | Left | 126 | TN6W3 M3 | 3.1 | 43.9 | 15.7 | 3.3 | -19.0 | 9.8 |
| 40+ | Female | Femur | Left | 128 | TN7W2 M24 | 7.2 | 43.9 | 15.7 | 3.3 | -18.9 | 7.5 |
| 40–45 | Female | Tibia | Left | 129 | TN6W6 M17 | 2.4 | 43.9 | 15.6 | 3.3 | -19.4 | 9.6 |
| 30–35 | Female | Radius | Left | 133 | TN6W6 M11 | 6.5 | 43.7 | 15.5 | 3.3 | -19.1 | 9.9 |
| Adult | Female | Femur | Left | 137 | TN7W2 M18 | 1.6 | 43.1 | 14.8 | 3.4 | -19.5 | 10.5 |
| Adult | Male | Radius | Left | 130 | TN6W5 M21 | 2.9 | 44.2 | 15.6 | 3.3 | -16.3 | 9.3 |
| 35–0 | Male | Humerus | Left | 145 | TN6W3 M15 | 1.5 | 41.8 | 14.8 | 3.3 | -19.2 | 10.2 |
| Adult | Ind. | Radius | Left | 131 | TN6W6 M10 | 1.4 | 43.9 | 15.2 | 3.4 | -18.6 | 10.4 |
| Adult | Ind. | Radius | Left | 132 | M1 | 1.1 | 43.0 | 15.0 | 3.3 | -18.5 | 10.3 |
| 40+ | Ind. | Fibula | Left | 138 | TN6W6 M9 | 8.6 | 43.2 | 15.4 | 3.3 | -18.9 | 10.5 |
| Adult | Ind. | Radius | Left | 141 | TN6W5 M20 | 1.1 | 44.4 | 15.0 | 3.4 | -18.2 | 8.5 |
| Adult | Ind. | Tibia | Left | 143 | TN6W6 M17 | 1.2 | 44.7 | 15.5 | 3.4 | -19.1 | 10.2 |
| 25+ | Ind. | Metapodial | Left | 144 | TN6W6 M19 | 1.5 | 45.0 | 15.9 | 3.3 | -19.2 | 9.4 |
| Adult | Ind. | Ulna | Left | 146 | TN9W7 M7 | 1.7 | 43.2 | 15.1 | 3.3 | -18.8 | 11.1 |
| 5± | Ind. | Radius | Left | 127 | TN7W2 M16 | 2.8 | 43.2 | 15.0 | 3.4 | -19.1 | 11.3 |
| 4–5 | Ind. | Ulna | Left | 139 | TN6W2 M22 | 2.3 | 44.8 | 15.7 | 3.3 | -18.6 | 11.1 |
Fig 3Scatter diagram of human and animal collagen carbon and nitrogen values from Shilinggang.
Analytical error is so small that it is contained within the symbols.
Fig 4Isotopic value distributions for domesticated animals showing groups with different husbandry strategies.
Summary of human and animal isotopic data.
Adults include samples from individuals over 25 years old. Children include two bone samples from individuals under 25 years old. SD: Standard deviation.
| Species | Sample number (n) | δ13C(‰) | δ15N(‰) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | SD (2σ) | Range | Average | SD (2σ) | Range | ||
| All human | 16 | -18.8 | 0.8 | -19.5--16.3 | 10.0 | 1.0 | 7.5–11.3 |
| Children | 2 | -18.9 | 0.3 | -19.1--18.5 | 11.1 | 0.1 | 11.1–11.3 |
| Adult | 14 | -18.8 | 0.8 | -19.5--16.3 | 9.8 | 0.9 | 7.5–11.1 |
| Sheep/goats | 10 | -19.1 | 5.3 | -23.03--9.63 | 4.9 | 1.5 | 3.0–7.28 |
| Cattle | 10 | -17.4 | 4.5 | -23.55--11.17 | 4.7 | 0.8 | 3.43–6.22 |
| Dog | 4 | -18.3 | 2.4 | -20.52--14.8 | 7.8 | 0.5 | 7.35–8.39 |
| Pig | 13 | -19.9 | 1.7 | -22.73--15.85 | 6.6 | 1.8 | 3.58–8.84 |
| Old World Monkey | 2 | -18.8 | 0.1 | -18.87--18.79 | 9.3 | 1.8 | 8.01–10.56 |
| Wild herbivore (Muntjac and Deer) | 19 | -22.5 | 1.4 | -25.87--19.92 | 5.2 | 0.7 | 4.07–6.96 |
Fig 5Comparison of human isotopic signatures for adult vs. child samples.
Human collagen carbon and nitrogen isotope results from sites in Yunnan.
| Site | Approximate date (Cal BP) | Location | δ13C (‰) | δ15N (‰) | Reference | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean | SD(2σ) | Range | N | Mean | SD(2σ) | Range | ||||
| Jinlianshan | 2500–2200 | Kunming | 9 | -18.8 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 9 | 9.8 | 0.9 | 2.6 | |
| Shilinggang | 2700–2300 | Nujiang | 16 | -18.8 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 16 | 10.0 | 1.0 | 3.8 | |