Literature DB >> 28529835

A new set of microsatellite primers for Coelogyne fimbriata (Orchidaceae) and cross-amplification in C. ovalis.

Wei-Chang Huang1,2,3, Kai Jiang1,2,4, Chao Hu1,2, Yue-E Xiao1,2, Barnabas C Seyler5, Yuan-Yuan Li4.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Declining orchid populations have made it necessary to prioritize the study of population structure and genetic diversity for species including Coelogyne fimbriata (Orchidaceae). METHODS AND
RESULTS: A biotin-streptavidin capture method was used to construct a microsatellite library for C. fimbriata. A total of 15 polymorphic nuclear microsatellite loci were isolated and characterized using 47 C. fimbriata individuals from two natural populations in China. The number of alleles per locus for the two populations ranged from two to 17. The observed and expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.000 to 1.000 and from 0.000 to 0.867, respectively. Among these polymorphic primers, 11 loci were also successfully amplified in C. ovalis, and 10 loci showed moderate to high-level polymorphism. Cross-amplification of the 15 polymorphic loci was tested in five related species: C. cumingii, C. eberhardtii, C. mayeriana, C. peltastes, and C. velutina.
CONCLUSIONS: Fifteen microsatellites in C. fimbriata and 10 in C. ovalis have moderate to high-level genetic variation, indicating their utility in population genetic studies, thus contributing to orchid conservation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coelogyne fimbriata; Coelogyne ovalis; Orchidaceae; medicinal orchid; microsatellites; polymorphic markers

Year:  2017        PMID: 28529835      PMCID: PMC5435408          DOI: 10.3732/apps.1700025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Coelogyne fimbriata Lindl. (Orchidaceae), a medicinal orchid, is mainly distributed in southern China, Cambodia, northeastern Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam (Clayton and Beaman, 2002). Because southern China is the northernmost edge of its distribution region, Chinese C. fimbriata populations are of particular concern because populations on distribution margins are most vulnerable to disturbance (Channell and Lomolino, 2000). Furthermore, in consideration of global climate change and habitat fragmentation, it is urgent to design effective conservation strategies for endangered natural orchid populations (Swarts and Dixon, 2009). Coelogyne fimbriata is an epiphytic or lithophytic orchid, which requires a dormancy period in winter. This species grows on its substrate with creeping and slender rhizomes. It can reproduce both sexually via seed and vegetatively by rhizomatic growth. Usually blooming in late summer, it produces one or two flowers on a scape. The flowers exhibit a type of pollinator deception in which the flower odor mimics food for foraging female wasps (Cheng et al., 2009). Many studies have focused on the pollination syndromes of orchids (Tang et al., 2014); however, there is a lack of genetic information documented for this species. Because genetic information is important for the conservation and sustainable utilization of orchids (Gijbels et al., 2015), we developed microsatellite markers to allow studies of the genetic diversity, genetic structure, and mating system of C. fimbriata. In total, 15 polymorphic microsatellite loci were isolated and characterized to study genetic variation within this species clade. These highly polymorphic loci displayed high genetic variation and extensive usability in congeneric species, and may serve as a universal tool for orchid genetic studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A biotin-streptavidin capture method was employed to construct a microsatellite-enriched DNA library (Jiang et al., 2011). First, we extracted genomic DNA from silica gel–dried leaves of one C. fimbriata individual using a Plant Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). The enzyme MseI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA) was used to digest approximately 300 ng of genomic DNA in a 25-μL reaction volume for 2 h at 37°C. Fragments 200–1000 bp in length were then ligated to an MseI-adapter pair (F: 5′-TACTCAGGACTCAT-3′ and R: 5′-GACGATGAGTCCTGAG-3′). The ligation-digestion mixture was diluted with ultrapure water (1:4), and the diluted fragments were amplified using MseI-N primer (5′-GATGAGTCCTGAGTAAN-3′) in a 25-μL PCR reaction volume at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 23 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 53°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min. Next, to obtain microsatellite-enriched DNA fragments, the PCR products were hybridized with 5′-biotinylated (AC)15 probes. We used streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) to capture single-stranded DNA fragments containing microsatellites. The enriched products were amplified using MseI-N primers for 28 cycles. After the PCR products were purified using a multifunctional DNA Extraction Kit (Bioteke Corporation, Beijing, China), they were ligated into Escherichia coli strain DH5α with the pMD19-T vector (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Dalian, Liaoning, China). We randomly selected and sequenced 249 positive clones using M13+/M13− primers on an ABI 3730 DNA Sequence Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). Of the 249 sequenced clones, 136 contained microsatellites. Twenty-four sequences were discarded because of short flanking regions for primer design. Finally, we designed 112 primer pairs using Premier 5.0 (PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, California, USA). We selected 28 individuals from Dawei Mountain, Yunnan Province, and 19 from Diaoluo Mountain, Hainan Province, China (Appendix 1), for PCR using these 112 primers. Of the 112 primers, 47 produced an expected band on 1% agarose gel, 40 failed to obtain amplification products, and 25 others produced multiple bands that were difficult to discriminate. To test for polymorphism, we used the M13(–21)-tailed primer method to fluorescently label alleles and PCR products, which were electrophoretically resolved using an ABI 3730 DNA Sequence Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) with an internal lane standard (GeneScan 500[−250] LIZ) (Schuelke, 2000). Microsatellite loci were amplified under the following conditions: 5 min of denaturation at 94°C; 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 53–65°C, and 30 s at 72°C; eight cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 53°C, and 30 s at 72°C; and a final 10-min extension at 72°C. Allele binning and calling were conducted using GeneMapper 4.0 (Applied Biosystems), revealing 15 polymorphic loci. Characteristics of the 15 polymorphic microsatellite loci developed for C. fimbriata are shown in Table 1. An additional 32 monomorphic loci are described in Appendix 2. Each polymorphic locus had two to 17 alleles, with a mean of 5.1. At the population level, the observed and expected heterozygosities were calculated with GenAlEx 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012) and ranged from 0.000 to 1.000 and from 0.000 to 0.867, respectively (Table 2). FSTAT 2.9.2.3 (Goudet, 1995) was used to analyze linkage disequilibrium and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). No significant linkage disequilibrium at any locus was detected for either population. However, significant deviation from HWE was found for most loci in the two populations (Table 2), which may be indicative of strong clonality. Signs of null alleles were detected in the loci CF1-11, CF1-51, and CF2-126 with MICRO-CHECKER 2.2.3 (van Oosterhout et al., 2004).
Table 1.

Characteristics of 15 polymorphic microsatellite markers developed for Coelogyne fimbriata.

LocusPrimer sequences (5′–3′)aTa (°C)Repeat motifAAllele size range (bp)GenBank accession no.
CF1-11F: <6-FAM>CAACATCCTCTCGGCATAT 60 (GT)9 7 429–443 KP676048
R: GACCACACTACACCTACAC
CF1-26F: <6-FAM>ATAACTCACGCCCGATTC 60 (CT)5 3 210–218 KP676049
R: CCTGTTGTTGCCTGCTGT
CF1-30F: <6-FAM>CACCTCTCCTCAATTACATCA 58 (ATC)6 2 103–109 KP676050
R: AGTTGGCGTAAGGCTAATG
CF1-51F: <HEX>TGAGAATGTCCGTAGGTT 58 (AG)14 7 336–362 KP676052
R: GGGATTGGAGTAAAGGGT
CF1-60F: <ROX>AAACCTTCGTTCGCTCCT 60 (TC)5…(CT)5…(TC)5 2 344–346 KP676053
R: GTGCCTGCTAGGGTTCCA
CF1-120F: <6-FAM>GGAATCACTCTCAACTTCAC 60 (GT)6 5 362–372 KP676054
R: ATCATAGGATGGACTCTGTAG
CF1-167F: <ROX>CAAGCAAGCACTGAGCAA 58 (AG)6 8 259–293 KP676055
R: GAGACCATCACCGCATTC
CF1-229F: <6-FAM>AGGCTTACTCGCATACTCT 52 (CT)7…(TC)7 2 181–187 KP676056
R: ATCTCGCTTCTGGCTTCA
CF1-231F: <HEX>GGTGCTATGTATGTGAA 52 (AG)33…(GA)18 2 285–289 KP676057
R: CAGACCATCAAGAAGCATA
CF2-26F: <6-FAM>CTCCCATACCCACCATTT 55 (AG)16…(AG)6 4 153–171 KX237659
R: ATAGCCTACCTCAAGACG
CF2-29F: <ROX>TTGTAGTCTTCATCCTTT 52 (TG)5 5 270–308 KX237660
R: TCTAGTCTACCCATACTT
CF2-57F: <HEX>TGACTTAGGACCAGGAA 55 (CT)27 17 173–213 KX237661
R: GTCGCAAGCACAGATA
CF2-126F: <6-FAM>CTCCCGTGCCTATGTTTC 52 (CT)20 4 253–259 KX237663
R: ATTCCGCTCTGATTTCCA
CF2-147F: <HEX>GGAGGTCTTTGATTAGAT 52 (CT)6CA(CT)5 4 254–260 KX237664
R: ATGGAGGATTATCAGTAT
CF2-172F: <ROX>CTTGTATTTCCCTTTCTTG 52 (CT)9(CA)6 4 257–271 KX237666
R: TGAGATAACTAAACCCAGA

Note: A = number of alleles; Ta = annealing temperature.

Fluorescent dyes (i.e., HEX, ROX, and 6-FAM) are presented with the forward primers.

Table 2.

Characteristics of 15 polymorphic microsatellite loci in Coelogyne fimbriata and C. ovalis populations, respectively.

Coelogyne fimbriataCoelogyne ovalis
DWS population (n = 28)DLS population (n = 19)MHX population (n = 21)JGX population (n = 16)
LocusAHoHeAHoHeAHoHeAHoHe
CF1-1170.259*0.74040.5000.475
CF1-2610.0000.00030.053*0.10190.333*0.85950.188*0.756
CF1-3021.000*0.50020.1580.22910.0000.00020.000*0.469
CF1-5170.286*0.66540.2500.736
CF1-6020.6430.43620.6880.451
CF1-12040.889*0.65830.3160.27740.0950.25550.500*0.585
CF1-16770.964*0.76650.579*0.67210.0000.00040.0000.516
CF1-22920.1790.31620.0630.061
CF1-23120.6800.44910.0000.00010.0000.00050.200*0.391
CF2-2620.7500.46930.3680.59760.667*0.604100.625*0.813
CF2-2930.7690.50040.3330.47440.9000.54630.9290.554
CF2-5750.926*0.598140.789*0.86740.952*0.58560.875*0.809
CF2-12620.111*0.50040.474*0.66920.0000.472*30.333*0.611
CF2-14710.0000.00030.8420.55410.0000.00010.0000.000
CF2-17220.0360.03530.4210.639100.5290.87770.063*0.510

Note: — = failed to amplify; A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity based on Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; Ho = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals genotyped.

Voucher and locality information for the populations are shown in Appendix 1.

*Indicates significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.001).

Characteristics of 15 polymorphic microsatellite markers developed for Coelogyne fimbriata. Note: A = number of alleles; Ta = annealing temperature. Fluorescent dyes (i.e., HEX, ROX, and 6-FAM) are presented with the forward primers. Characteristics of 15 polymorphic microsatellite loci in Coelogyne fimbriata and C. ovalis populations, respectively. Note: — = failed to amplify; A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity based on Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; Ho = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals genotyped. Voucher and locality information for the populations are shown in Appendix 1. *Indicates significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.001). Two wild C. ovalis Lindl. populations (Appendix 1) were used to test the cross-compatibility and polymorphism of the 15 microsatellite loci. This testing was performed because C. ovalis and C. fimbriata have been visually confused as the same species, with no clear differences shown in studies of pollinaria or other morphological characters (Pelser et al., 2000). However, many researchers do recognize C. fimbriata and C. ovalis as separate species (Govaerts, 1999; Wu and Hong, 2009; George and George, 2011). In our results, 11 of 15 loci could obtain clear PCR products and 10 showed moderate to high levels of polymorphism, with the exception of one locus (CF2-147). No significant linkage disequilibrium was detected in C. ovalis populations; however, significant deviation from HWE was found in these populations at most loci (Table 2). Signs of null alleles were detected in the CF1-26, CF1-120, CF2-126, and CF2-172 loci. In addition, cross-amplification of 15 polymorphic loci was conducted on another five related species (n = 5 for each species): C. cumingii Lindl., C. eberhardtii Gagnep., C. mayeriana Rchb. f., C. peltastes Rchb. f., and C. velutina de Vogel; these samples were collected from living plants at Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden (Appendix 1). Four to eight loci were successfully amplified in all five Coelogyne species (Table 3).
Table 3.

Amplification of 15 microsatellite loci developed for Coelogyne fimbriata in five other Coelogyne species.

LocusC. cumingii (n = 5)C. mayeriana (n = 5)C. eberhardtii (n = 5)C. peltastes (n = 5)C. velutina (n = 5)
CF1-11
CF1-26+++++
CF1-30+++++
CF1-51
CF1-60
CF1-120+++
CF1-167+++++
CF1-229
CF1-231+
CF2-26+++
CF2-29+
CF2-57+++
CF2-126
CF2-147+
CF2-172+++++

Note: + = primer successfully amplified; — = primer failed to amplify; n = number of individuals.

Amplification of 15 microsatellite loci developed for Coelogyne fimbriata in five other Coelogyne species. Note: + = primer successfully amplified; — = primer failed to amplify; n = number of individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, although a majority of the developed loci showed monomorphism (68.1%), 15 polymorphic loci were identified in C. fimbriata. These polymorphic loci are valuable for orchid population genetic studies. For example, these markers can be used to characterize the clonal structure of C. fimbriata to estimate seed and pollen flow at a fine scale. Furthermore, these polymorphic loci can provide more information, such as genetic diversity indices, which are important for the conservation and management of the species.
Appendix 1.

Locality information for the Coelogyne fimbriata and C. ovalis samples used in this study.

SpeciesLocality IDCollection localityGeographic coordinatesCollectorCollection no.n
Coelogyne fimbriata Lindl.DWSYunnan, China22.931°N, 103.685°EWei-Chang HuangCS-HWC201606-228
Coelogyne fimbriata DLSHainan, China18.659°N, 109.916°EMing-Zhong HuangCS-HMZ201610-619
Coelogyne ovalis Lindl.MHXYunnan, China23.051°N, 103.356°EWei-Chang HuangCS-HWC201606-521
Coelogyne ovalisJGXYunnan, China23.523°N, 100.646°EWei-Chang HuangCS-HWC201509-816
Coelogyne cumingii Lindl.bTaiwanWei-Chang Huang5
Coelogyne eberhardtii Gagnep.bThailandWei-Chang Huang5
Coelogyne mayeriana Rchb. f.bTaiwanWei-Chang Huang5
Coelogyne peltastes Rchb. f.bTaiwanWei-Chang Huang5
Coelogyne velutina de VogelbTaiwanWei-Chang Huang5

Note: — = no detailed information available; n = number of individuals sampled.

All voucher specimens were deposited in Shanghai Chenshan Herbarium (CSH), Shanghai, China.

Samples of Coelogyne cumingii, C. eberhardtii, C. mayeriana, C. peltastes, and C. velutina were collected from living plants at Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden (introduced from Taiwan and Thailand according to the record).

Appendix 2.

Characteristics of 32 monomorphic microsatellite markers developed for Coelogyne fimbriata.

LocusPrimer sequences (5′–3′)Ta (°C)Repeat motifAllele size (bp)GenBank accession no.
CF1-33F: TAAGTAATTCAGCCTCCC 55 (CT)8 197 KP676050
R: CAGACCATCAAGAAGCATA
CF2-2F: CAAGTCCAAATCAGCGAAGG 56 (AG)15 152 KY744706
R: TCCAGAATACATCCAGGCAC
CF2-3F: GAAGAAATCAAGGACCAATG 64 (TCT)5 198 KX237656
R: TCTGAGAACGAAGGAGGC
CF2-8F: TAGGAGGTGAGGAGGAA 56 (AG)15 402 KX237657
R: CCAGATGCCAAGATAAA
CF2-15F: CGACTTTCTCCGGTATCTC 56 (AG)14 248 KY744707
R: CACTCACTCAGCCTCTTCC
CF2-20F: GGAAAATAGTAAAAGCCAT 56 (TC)18 181 KY744708
R: TCCCAAACTTCAAACC
CF2-23F: CTCCCCGTTGTAATCCAATCAT 64 (CT)12 178 KY744709
R: GTTCCTCCTTCGGCTACGTTAG
CF2-24F: ACCCTTCCTATCGCTGTATT 62 (CT)7 186 KX237658
R: CTCTTCCCACCAAGTCTTTT
CF2-27F: GAGAGTGGAGGTAGGAGAA 62 (AG)6 111 KY766112
R: GGAGGAGGCTATGGAGAA
CF2-59F: GAAGCAGAAAATAACATA 56 (TC)22 90 KY744710
R: TCTCACTCCACTCTATCT
CF2-101F: TGGTCAGTCGGAGGAG 64 (TC)27 355 KY744711
R: ATGGAGGTGGTAGTGTTGG
CF2-112F: GGGATTCGGACTGAGATT 64 (GA)39 228 KX237663
R: TTAGTAGGGATGCGAGGAG
CF2-127F: TCAAGTCCCATCAATC 53 (CT)23 153 KY744712
R: TTTAGTGCTCCACATT
CF2-129F: TTGGCATTTCGCTTCT 59 (CT)12…(TC)16 235 KY744713
R: CGTGTCTTTGTCGGTTT
CF2-136F: TCGACCCGTAGTACGCAACA 64 (TC)8 285 KY744714
R: ATGGACACCAGGGCAAGG
CF2-137F: GGAAGGCTATGGAGAAAT 64 (TC)10…(CT)7 126 KY744715
R: ATGGGATGACCAGAGGAT
CF2-140F: GAAGATGGGAAGAAAGAA 62 (GA)10 108 KY744716
R: TGAAAGGAGGAGTAGGAG
CF2-146F: TATGCAAATGATATGA 53 (TC)15…(AC)10 347 KY744717
R: GAGAATGTGAGAAAGT
CF2-148F: TGAATAAGATATTCGGATCA 56 (AG)20 227 KY744718
R: AAATCGGTGTATGGAGAC
CF2-149F: GTCAAACAGAAAGCCAAG 56 (CT)18 350 KX237665
R: AAAGATCCGCTCCACTAT
CF2-155F: TCTCGTCTTTTCCTCTTACC 56 (CT)20 104 KY744719
R: CCATTACCTCCTCACCATAC
CF2-160F: GAATCCTCGCTCCCATTT 53 (TG)11…(GA)15 109 KY744720
R: GTTGGTTTAGAGTTTGCAGGTA
CF2-171F: TCCTTGTTCGCGTGAAAC 59 (GA)43 232 KY744721
R: GAGATCCCTCGACCATAC
CF2-177F: AAGAGTTAGAAGTGGGGAGG 59 (AG)19AA(AG)15 405 KY744722
R: GGGGAAGTGCCTTATGAT
CF2-192F: ACGGGTGAGTATCTTGGC 64 (CA)16 274 KY744723
R: GAGGTGGTGAACTCCATTTA
CF2-213F: ACCAATAGGAAGTGAGGAGGAA 64 (CT)16 151 KY744724
R: ATGGCGGAGCAAGAAAGG
CF2-217F: CTTGTTTCATAAAGCGAAGT 64 (CT)23…(CA)13 181 KX237667
R: CTTTTATCACAGTCACCCAT
CF2-222F: TAGGGGAAACTATGGACAAA 63 (CT)46 181 KY744725
R: CGAGTTAGGGATTAGAGGGT
CF2-232F: AATAAGATAATGGAAGGA 62 (GA)9 108 KY744726
R: ACTCCAGTTTGTCTTTTA
CF2-234F: ATCAAAGCCTATTATTCCC 64 (TC)8 292 KY744727
R: AGATTTACCGTCGTCAGC
CF2-238F: AACGCCCACCACCAAGTA 64 (GA)11 379 KY744728
R: CGGCCCTATTCCCTCACA
CF2-240F: TACACGCCCTAATACCCA 60 (TC)13 488 KY744729
R: CGAGGAGGAGGTTGAGAT

Note: Ta = annealing temperature.

  6 in total

1.  An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments.

Authors:  M Schuelke
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species.

Authors:  R Channell; M V Lomolino
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Terrestrial orchid conservation in the age of extinction.

Authors:  Nigel D Swarts; Kingsley W Dixon
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  A set of microsatellite primers for Zostera japonica (Zosteraceae).

Authors:  Kai Jiang; Hui Gao; Na-Na Xu; Eric Po Keung Tsang; Xiao-Yong Chen
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  The pollination of a self-incompatible, food-mimic orchid, Coelogyne fimbriata (Orchidaceae), by female Vespula wasps.

Authors:  Jin Cheng; Jun Shi; Fa-Zhi Shangguan; Amots Dafni; Zhen-Hai Deng; Yi-Bo Luo
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update.

Authors:  Rod Peakall; Peter E Smouse
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.937

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.