Siddharth M Shah1, William L Walter1, Stephen M Tai1, Michelle F Lorimer2, Richard N de Steiger3. 1. Specialist Orthopaedic Group, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Department of Clinical Research, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 3. Department of Surgery, Epworth HealthCare, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dislocation is a leading cause of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although more common in the first few years after the procedure, dislocation can occur at any time. This study investigated the difference in late dislocation in ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings compared with metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings in THA. METHODS: Data were used from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, and the cumulative percent revision for dislocation was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for the different bearing surfaces. There were 192,275 THAs included in the study with 101,915 metal-on-cross-linked polyethylene (MoXLPE), 30,256 ceramic-on-cross-linked polyethylene (CoXLPE), and 60,104 CoC. RESULTS: The cumulative percent revision for dislocation at 13 years for MoXLPE, CoXLPE, and CoC groups was 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.3), 1.0 (95% CI, 0.7-1.4), and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.8-1.1), respectively. There was an increased risk of revision for dislocation for MoXLPE compared with CoXLPE and CoC. When stratified for head size, there was no difference in the risk of revision for dislocation between MoXLPE, CoXLPE, and CoC in the 28- and 32-mm head sizes. With a head size of 36 mm, MoXLPE had a higher rate of dislocation compared with other materials. CONCLUSION: Bearing surface has little impact on revision for dislocation.
BACKGROUND:Dislocation is a leading cause of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although more common in the first few years after the procedure, dislocation can occur at any time. This study investigated the difference in late dislocation in ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings compared with metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings in THA. METHODS: Data were used from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, and the cumulative percent revision for dislocation was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for the different bearing surfaces. There were 192,275 THAs included in the study with 101,915 metal-on-cross-linked polyethylene (MoXLPE), 30,256 ceramic-on-cross-linked polyethylene (CoXLPE), and 60,104 CoC. RESULTS: The cumulative percent revision for dislocation at 13 years for MoXLPE, CoXLPE, and CoC groups was 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.3), 1.0 (95% CI, 0.7-1.4), and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.8-1.1), respectively. There was an increased risk of revision for dislocation for MoXLPE compared with CoXLPE and CoC. When stratified for head size, there was no difference in the risk of revision for dislocation between MoXLPE, CoXLPE, and CoC in the 28- and 32-mm head sizes. With a head size of 36 mm, MoXLPE had a higher rate of dislocation compared with other materials. CONCLUSION: Bearing surface has little impact on revision for dislocation.
Authors: Francesco Castagnini; Barbara Bordini; Monica Cosentino; Cristina Ancarani; Federica Mariotti; Federico Biondi; Cesare Faldini; Francesco Traina Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Valtteri J Panula; Elina M Ekman; Mikko S Venäläinen; Inari Laaksonen; Riku Klén; Jaason J Haapakoski; Antti P Eskelinen; Laura L Elo; Keijo T Mäkelä Journal: Scand J Surg Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 2.360