Literature DB >> 28528431

Rapid rest/stress regadenoson ungated perfusion CMR for detection of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Erik T Bieging1, I Haider2, G Adluru3, L Chang2, P Suksaranjit2, D Likhite3, A Shaaban3, L Jensen3, B D Wilson2, C J McGann4, E DiBella3.   

Abstract

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion has been established as a useful imaging modality for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there are several limitations when applying standard, ECG-gated stress/rest perfusion CMR to patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In this study we investigate an approach with no ECG gating and a rapid rest/stress perfusion protocol to determine its accuracy for detection of CAD in patients with AF. 26 patients with AF underwent a rapid rest/regadenoson stress CMR perfusion imaging protocol, and all patients had X-ray coronary angiography. An ungated radial myocardial perfusion sequence was used. Imaging protocol included: rest perfusion image acquisition, followed nearly immediately by administration of regadenoson to induce hyperemia, 60 s wait, and stress image acquisition. CMR perfusion images were interpreted by three blinded readers as normal or abnormal. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by comparison to X-ray angiography. 21 of the CMR rest/stress perfusion scans were negative, and 5 were positive by angiography criteria. Majority results of the ungated datasets from all of the readers showed a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 80, 100 and 96%, respectively, for detection of CAD. An ungated, rapid rest/stress regadenoson perfusion CMR protocol appears to be useful for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD in patients with AF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Cardiac perfusion; ECG gating; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Ungated cardiac MR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28528431      PMCID: PMC6267777          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1168-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  29 in total

1.  Myocardial perfusion acquisition without magnetization preparation or gating.

Authors:  Edward V R DiBella; Liyong Chen; Matthias C Schabel; Ganesh Adluru; Chris J McGann
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Christian M Wacker; Norbert Wilke; Nidal Al-Saadi; Ekkehart Sauer; Kalman Huettle; Stefan O Schönberg; Andreas Luchner; Oliver Strohm; Hakan Ahlstrom; Thorsten Dill; Nadja Hoebel; Tamas Simor
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Myocardial perfusion imaging does not adequately assess the risk of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Marcelle D Smit; René A Tio; Riemer H J A Slart; Felix Zijlstra; Isabelle C Van Gelder
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Automated rectilinear self-gated cardiac cine imaging.

Authors:  Mark E Crowe; Andrew C Larson; Qiang Zhang; James Carr; Richard D White; Debiao Li; Orlando P Simonetti
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Christian M Wacker; Albert C van Rossum; Massimo Lombardi; Nidal Al-Saadi; Hakan Ahlstrom; Thorsten Dill; Henrik B W Larsson; Scott D Flamm; Moritz Marquardt; Lars Johansson
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 6.  Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Georges Fau; Guillaume Née; Javed Ehtisham; Rémy Morello; Martial Hamon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 7.  Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial magnetic resonance perfusion to diagnose ischemic stenosis with fractional flow reserve as reference: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min Li; Tao Zhou; Lin-feng Yang; Zhao-hui Peng; Juan Ding; Gang Sun
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10-08

8.  Acquisition and reconstruction of undersampled radial data for myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ganesh Adluru; Chris McGann; Peter Speier; Eugene G Kholmovski; Akram Shaaban; Edward V R Dibella
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Rapid ungated myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: preliminary diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Alexis Harrison; Ganesh Adluru; Kavitha Damal; Akram M Shaaban; Brent Wilson; Daniel Kim; Chris McGann; Nassir F Marrouche; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Impact of arrhythmia on diagnostic performance of adenosine stress CMR in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Simon Greulich; Hannah Steubing; Stefan Birkmeier; Stefan Grün; Kerstin Bentz; Udo Sechtem; Heiko Mahrholdt
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Amer Alaiti; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Long-term prognostic value of vasodilator stress cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Karl J Weiss; Sarah B Nasser; Tamar Bigvava; Adelina Doltra; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Alexander Berger; Markus S Anker; Christian Stehning; Patrick Doeblin; Mohamed Abdelmeguid; Mohamed Talat; Rolf Gebker; Wael E-Naggar; Burkert Pieske; Sebastian Kelle
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-12-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.