AIMS: The role of coronary artery disease (CAD) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is poorly investigated. This study investigated the value of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the assessment of risk of CAD in patients with a history of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Out of consecutive patients without previous coronary angiogram or history of CAD referred for SPECT, patients with a history of AF (n = 129) were compared with age- and gender-matched controls (n = 124). Primary endpoint was positive SPECT, i.e. unambiguous signs of ischaemia. There was no significant difference with regard to positive SPECT outcome between AF patients and controls (14 patients, 11% vs. 21 patients, 17%; P = 0.16). Coronary angiography (CAG) performed after SPECT demonstrated a higher yield of positive SPECT regarding significant CAD in control patients (10 out of 15 patients, 67%) than in AF patients (2 out of 13 patients, 15%; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Positive SPECT outcome was similar in patients with AF and in controls. Nevertheless, in AF patients a positive SPECT outcome was less often related to significant CAD in those patients who subsequently underwent CAG. These results emphasize the need for new non-invasive techniques to adequately assess the risk of significant CAD in AF patients.
AIMS: The role of coronary artery disease (CAD) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is poorly investigated. This study investigated the value of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the assessment of risk of CAD in patients with a history of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Out of consecutive patients without previous coronary angiogram or history of CAD referred for SPECT, patients with a history of AF (n = 129) were compared with age- and gender-matched controls (n = 124). Primary endpoint was positive SPECT, i.e. unambiguous signs of ischaemia. There was no significant difference with regard to positive SPECT outcome between AFpatients and controls (14 patients, 11% vs. 21 patients, 17%; P = 0.16). Coronary angiography (CAG) performed after SPECT demonstrated a higher yield of positive SPECT regarding significant CAD in control patients (10 out of 15 patients, 67%) than in AFpatients (2 out of 13 patients, 15%; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Positive SPECT outcome was similar in patients with AF and in controls. Nevertheless, in AFpatients a positive SPECT outcome was less often related to significant CAD in those patients who subsequently underwent CAG. These results emphasize the need for new non-invasive techniques to adequately assess the risk of significant CAD in AFpatients.
Authors: Erik T Bieging; I Haider; G Adluru; L Chang; P Suksaranjit; D Likhite; A Shaaban; L Jensen; B D Wilson; C J McGann; E DiBella Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-05-20 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Karl J Weiss; Sarah B Nasser; Tamar Bigvava; Adelina Doltra; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Alexander Berger; Markus S Anker; Christian Stehning; Patrick Doeblin; Mohamed Abdelmeguid; Mohamed Talat; Rolf Gebker; Wael E-Naggar; Burkert Pieske; Sebastian Kelle Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2021-12-06
Authors: Alexis Harrison; Ganesh Adluru; Kavitha Damal; Akram M Shaaban; Brent Wilson; Daniel Kim; Chris McGann; Nassir F Marrouche; Edward V R DiBella Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 5.364