Literature DB >> 28528370

Systematic radiographic evaluation of three potential implantation sites for a semi-implantable bone conduction device in 52 patients after previous mastoid surgery.

Bernhard G Weiss1, Mattis Bertlich2, Rebecka Scheele2, Martin Canis2, Mark Jakob2, Jan M Sohns3,4, Friedrich Ihler2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was the evaluation of three localizations for the implantation of a semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction device after previous mastoid surgery. This is a retrospective review of electronic datasets of cranial computed tomography studies. The study setting is one tertiary referral center and included 52 consecutive adult patients (60 temporal bones) with a history of mastoid surgery. The intervention was virtual placement of the device with a planning software within the remaining mastoid as well as dorsal of the sigmoid sinus and caudal of the transverse sinus (retrosigmoidal localization) and dorsocranial of the parietomastoid suture and cranial of the transverse sinus (parietal localization). The main outcome measure included dimensions of the bone for the reception of implant and screws, relative localization of dura mater or sinus sigmoideus, distance to the cochlea, thickness of the epicranium and classification of implantation as possible or impossible. Implantation within the remaining mastoid was deemed possible in 35 mastoid bones (58.3%). The best-suited alternative localization was retrosigmoidal in 22 (42.3%) and parietal in 29 patients (55.8%). The mean distance from the implantation site to the cochlea was lowest with on average 41.2 ± 3.1 mm from within the remaining mastoid. The differences in distance from the cochlea to the alternative localizations were each statistically significant (p < 0.01, ANOVA/Bonferroni t test). The retrosigmoidal and parietal localizations are suitable alternative implantation sites. The application of spacers may prevent contact to the sinuses or dura. Preoperative CT-based planning is recommended in cases of previous mastoid surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 (case series).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Correction of hearing impairment; Hearing aids; Otologic surgical procedures; Temporal bone; X-Ray computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28528370     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4609-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  29 in total

1.  Assessment of mastoid air cell size versus sigmoid sinus variables with a tomography-assisted digital image processing program and morphometry.

Authors:  A Sirikçi; Y A Bayazit; S Kervancioğlu; E Ozer; M Kanlikama; M Bayram
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Bone conduction thresholds and skull vibration measured on the teeth during stimulation at different sites on the human head.

Authors:  T Ito; C Röösli; C J Kim; J H Sim; A M Huber; R Probst
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing device: audiological and surgical aspects in a first series of patients with mixed hearing loss.

Authors:  Maurizio Barbara; Marco Perotti; Barbara Gioia; Luigi Volpini; Simonetta Monini
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 4.  Panel 7: Treatment and comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Paola Marchisio; Tasnee Chonmaitree; Eugene Leibovitz; Allan Lieberthal; Jorgen Lous; Ellen Mandel; David McCormick; Peter Morris; Aino Ruohola
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  A new bone conduction implant: surgical technique and results.

Authors:  Manuel Manrique; Ignacio Sanhueza; Raquel Manrique; Jorge de Abajo
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  The distance of the sigmoid sinus and the middle fossa dura from the external auditory canal in chronic otitis media.

Authors:  M Rajati; A Shahabi; H Haghir; M Afzalaghaee
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Retrosigmoidal approach to the posterior cranial fossa. An anatomical study.

Authors:  J Lang; A Samii
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Retrosigmoid implantation of an active bone conduction stimulator in a patient with chronic otitis media.

Authors:  Luis Lassaletta; Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado; Elena Muñoz; Javier Gavilan
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.863

9.  The Bonebridge semi-implantable bone conduction hearing device: experience in an Asian patient.

Authors:  W S S Tsang; J K Y Yu; K S S Bhatia; T K C Wong; M C F Tong
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 10.  Active Bone Conduction Prosthesis: Bonebridge(TM).

Authors:  Mario E Zernotti; Andrea Bravo Sarasty
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  A Comparative Study of a Novel Adhesive Bone Conduction Device and Conventional Treatment Options for Conductive Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Piotr H Skarzynski; Anna Ratuszniak; Kamila Osinska; Magdalena Koziel; Bartlomiej Krol; Katarzyna B Cywka; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implants: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Astrid Magele; Philipp Schoerg; Barbara Stanek; Bernhard Gradl; Georg Mathias Sprinzl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.