| Literature DB >> 26491482 |
Mario E Zernotti1, Andrea Bravo Sarasty2.
Abstract
Introduction Bone conduction implants are indicated for patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss, as well as for patients with single-sided deafness (SSD). The transcutaneous technology avoids several complications of the percutaneous bone conduction implants including skin reaction, skin growth over the abutment, and wound infection. The Bonebridge (MED-EL, Austria) prosthesis is a semi-implantable hearing system: the BCI (Bone Conduction Implant) is the implantable part that contains the Bone Conduction-Floating Mass Transducer (BC-FMT), which applies the vibrations directly to the bone; the external component is the audio processor Amadé BB (MED-EL, Austria), which digitally processes the sound and sends the information through the coil to the internal part. Bonebridge may be implanted through three different approaches: the transmastoid, the retrosigmoid, or the middle fossa approach. Objective This systematic review aims to describe the world́s first active bone conduction implant system, Bonebridge, as well as describe the surgical techniques in the three possible approaches, showing results from implant centers in the world in terms of functional gain, speech reception thresholds and word recognition scores. Data Synthesis The authors searched the MEDLINE database using the key term Bonebridge. They selected only five publications to include in this systematic review. The review analyzes 20 patients that received Bonebridge implants with different approaches and pathologies. Conclusion Bonebridge is a solution for patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss and SSD with different surgical approaches, depending on their anatomy. The system imparts fewer complications than percutaneous bone conduction implants and shows proven benefits in speech discrimination and functional gain.Entities:
Keywords: bone conduction hearing; bone conduction implants; bonebridge; conductive hearing loss; mixed hearing loss; single sided deafness
Year: 2015 PMID: 26491482 PMCID: PMC4593900 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 1809-4864
Fig. 1Bonebridge in mastoid.
Fig. 2Bone Conduction Implant (BCI).
Fig. 3Audiological criteria for conductive and mixed hearing loss.
Fig. 4Audiological criteria for Single-Sided Deafness (SSD).
Fig. 5Previous planification showing the position of BB in retrosigmoidal approach.
Fig. 6Retrosigmoid approach.
Fig. 7BB placement in a retrosigmoidal approach.
Details of the systematic Review
| Author | No. of Patients | Approach | Functional gain |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sprinzl et al. | 12 | Transmastoid retrosigmoid | 25 db |
| Barbara et al. | 4 | Transmastoid Retrosigmoid | 36 db |
| Tsang et al. | 1 | Transmastoid | 24 db |
| Lassaletta et al. | 1 | Retrosigmoid | 43 db |
| Hassepass et al. | 2 | Transmastoid | 37 db |
Fig. 8Functional gain as reported by five different implant centers. The graph includes a total 20 subjects with mixed and conductive hearing loss.