Literature DB >> 28527771

Aspirin Versus Aspirin Plus Clopidogrel as Antithrombotic Treatment Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Balloon-Expandable Valve: The ARTE (Aspirin Versus Aspirin + Clopidogrel Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Randomized Clinical Trial.

Josep Rodés-Cabau1, Jean-Bernard Masson2, Robert C Welsh3, Bruno Garcia Del Blanco4, Marc Pelletier5, John G Webb6, Faisal Al-Qoofi7, Philippe Généreux8, Gabriel Maluenda9, Martin Thoenes10, Jean-Michel Paradis11, Chekrallah Chamandi11, Vicenç Serra4, Eric Dumont11, Mélanie Côté11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare aspirin plus clopidogrel with aspirin alone as antithrombotic treatment following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for the prevention of ischemic events, bleeding events, and death.
BACKGROUND: Few data exist on the optimal antithrombotic therapy following TAVR.
METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial comparing aspirin (80 to 100 mg/day) plus clopidogrel (75 mg/day) (dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT]) versus aspirin alone (single-antiplatelet therapy [SAPT]) in patients undergoing TAVR with a balloon-expandable valve. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or transient ischemic attack, or major or life-threatening bleeding (according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 definitions) within the 3 months following the procedure. The trial was prematurely stopped after the inclusion of 74% of the planned study population.
RESULTS: A total of 222 patients were included, 111 allocated to DAPT and 111 to SAPT. The composite of death, MI, stroke or transient ischemic attack, or major or life-threatening bleeding tended to occur more frequently in the DAPT group (15.3% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.065). There were no differences between groups in the occurrence of death (DAPT, 6.3%; SAPT, 3.6%; p = 0.37), MI (DAPT, 3.6%; SAT, 0.9%; p = 0.18), or stroke or transient ischemic attack (DAPT, 2.7%; SAPT, 0.9%; p = 0.31) at 3 months. DAPT was associated with a higher rate of major or life-threatening bleeding events (10.8% vs. 3.6% in the SAPT group, p = 0.038). There were no differences between groups in valve hemodynamic status post-TAVR.
CONCLUSIONS: This small trial showed that SAPT (vs. DAPT) tended to reduce the occurrence of major adverse events following TAVR. SAPT reduced the risk for major or life-threatening events while not increasing the risk for MI or stroke. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results. (Aspirin Versus Aspirin + Clopidogrel Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: The ARTE Trial [ARTE], NCT01559298; Aspirin Versus Aspirin+Clopidogrel as Antithrombotic Treatment Following TAVI [ARTE], NCT02640794).
Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; aspirin; bleeding; clopidogrel; stroke; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28527771     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  39 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: status update.

Authors:  Antoinette Neylon; Khalid Ahmed; Federico Mercanti; Faisal Sharif; Darren Mylotte
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Antithrombotic management after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Fiachra McHugh; Khalid Ahmed; Antoinette Neylon; Faisal Sharif; Darren Mylotte
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  TAVR Vs. SAVR in Intermediate-Risk Patients: What Influences Our Choice of Therapy.

Authors:  Sasha Still; Molly Szerlip; Michael Mack
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Antithrombotic treatment following transcatheter valve replacement: current considerations.

Authors:  Ioanna Koniari; Nicholas G Kounis; George Hahalis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a new piece of the still unresolved puzzle.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gargiulo; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  The current status of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Wieneke Vlastra; Jan J Piek; Ronak Delewi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate and low risk patients-clinical evidence.

Authors:  Sameer Arora; John P Vavalle
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 8.  Challenges in Aortic Stenosis: Review of Antiplatelet/Anticoagulant Therapy Management with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): TAVR with Recent PCI, TAVR in the Patient with Atrial Fibrillation, and TAVR Thrombosis Management.

Authors:  Matthew W Sherwood; Amit N Vora
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a patient with severe aortic valve stenosis, colon cancer, and obstructive ileus: A case report.

Authors:  Tetsu Tanaka; Kazuyuki Yahagi; Taishi Okuno; Yu Horiuchi; Takayoshi Kusuhara; Motoi Yokozuka; Sumio Miura; Kengo Tanabe
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2018-02-14

Review 10.  Single versus dual anti-platelet therapy post transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Tomo Ando; Hisato Takagi; Alexandros Briasoulis; Luis Afonso
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.