Laura Liebermann1, David A Leske1, Sarah R Hatt1, Yolanda S Castañeda2, Suzanne M Wernimont1, Christina S Cheng-Patel2, Eileen E Birch3, Jonathan M Holmes4. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas. 3. Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: holmes.jonathan@mayo.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify specific health-related quality of life and visual function concerns affecting children with bilateral visual impairment as expressed by children or one of their parents (proxy) and concerns affecting the parents themselves. METHODS: A total of 37 children <16 years of age with visual impairment (visual acuity worse than 20/70 in the better eye) and one parent for each child were prospectively enrolled. Semistructured individual interviews were performed with children 5-15 years of age (n = 16) and with one parent for each child (ages 0-15 years, N = 37). Interview transcripts were analyzed using NVivo software. Categories of concern were identified from both child and parent interviews, from which broad themes were identified. The frequencies of the themes and specific categories of concerns were calculated. RESULTS: Regarding the child's experience, categories of concern were grouped into 6 themes: visual function (expressed by 13 of 16 children [81%] and 33 of 37 parents [89%]), treatment (63% and 54%), emotions (50% and 68%), social (50% and 70%), physical discomfort (50% and 22%), and worry (38% and 8%). Concerns expressed regarding the parents' own experience were grouped into 5 themes: worry (100%), compensate-adjust for condition (89%), treatment (84%), emotions (81%), and affects family (46%). CONCLUSIONS: Individual interviews identified a wide spectrum of concerns in children with visual impairment and their parents, affecting functional, emotional, social and physical domains. Specific concerns will be used to develop patient-derived questionnaires for quantifying the effects of visual impairment on children and parents in everyday life.
PURPOSE: To identify specific health-related quality of life and visual function concerns affecting children with bilateral visual impairment as expressed by children or one of their parents (proxy) and concerns affecting the parents themselves. METHODS: A total of 37 children <16 years of age with visual impairment (visual acuity worse than 20/70 in the better eye) and one parent for each child were prospectively enrolled. Semistructured individual interviews were performed with children 5-15 years of age (n = 16) and with one parent for each child (ages 0-15 years, N = 37). Interview transcripts were analyzed using NVivo software. Categories of concern were identified from both child and parent interviews, from which broad themes were identified. The frequencies of the themes and specific categories of concerns were calculated. RESULTS: Regarding the child's experience, categories of concern were grouped into 6 themes: visual function (expressed by 13 of 16 children [81%] and 33 of 37 parents [89%]), treatment (63% and 54%), emotions (50% and 68%), social (50% and 70%), physical discomfort (50% and 22%), and worry (38% and 8%). Concerns expressed regarding the parents' own experience were grouped into 5 themes: worry (100%), compensate-adjust for condition (89%), treatment (84%), emotions (81%), and affects family (46%). CONCLUSIONS: Individual interviews identified a wide spectrum of concerns in children with visual impairment and their parents, affecting functional, emotional, social and physical domains. Specific concerns will be used to develop patient-derived questionnaires for quantifying the effects of visual impairment on children and parents in everyday life.
Authors: Donald L Patrick; Laurie B Burke; Chad J Gwaltney; Nancy Kline Leidy; Mona L Martin; Elizabeth Molsen; Lena Ring Journal: Value Health Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Donald L Patrick; Laurie B Burke; Chad J Gwaltney; Nancy Kline Leidy; Mona L Martin; Elizabeth Molsen; Lena Ring Journal: Value Health Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Y S Castañeda; C S Cheng-Patel; D A Leske; S M Wernimont; S R Hatt; L Liebermann; E E Birch; J M Holmes Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Kathryn Eilene Lasch; Patrick Marquis; Marc Vigneux; Linda Abetz; Benoit Arnould; Martha Bayliss; Bruce Crawford; Kathleen Rosa Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-05-30 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Margaret Rothman; Laurie Burke; Pennifer Erickson; Nancy Kline Leidy; Donald L Patrick; Charles D Petrie Journal: Value Health Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Laura Liebermann; David A Leske; Yolanda S Castañeda; Sarah R Hatt; Suzanne M Wernimont; Christina S Cheng; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2016-07-02 Impact factor: 1.220
Authors: Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Yolanda S Castañeda; Suzanne M Wernimont; Laura Liebermann; Christina S Cheng-Patel; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Yolanda S Castañeda; Suzanne M Wernimont; Laura Liebermann; Christina S Cheng-Patel; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 1.220
Authors: Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Yolanda S Castañeda; Suzanne M Wernimont; Laura Liebermann; Christina S Cheng-Patel; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Anna M Bujnowska; Celestino Rodríguez; Trinidad García; Débora Areces; Nigel V Marsh Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 3.390