Literature DB >> 28527035

Comparison of rhizosphere properties as affected by different Bt- and non-Bt-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes and fertilization.

Maqshoof Ahamd1, Waleed Mumtaz Abbasi2, Moazzam Jamil2, Muhammad Iqbal3, Azhar Hussain2, Muhammad Fakhar-U-Zaman Akhtar2, Farheen Nazli4.   

Abstract

Incorporation of genetically modified crops in the cropping system raises the need for studying the effect of these crops on the soil ecosystem. The current study aimed to compare the effect of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt)- and non-Bt-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes on rhizosphere properties under fertilized and unfertilized soil conditions. One non-Bt-cotton (IUB 75) and four Bt-cotton varieties (IUB-222, MM-58, IUB-13, FH-142) were sown in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) in a factorial fashion with three replications under unfertilized (T1) and fertilized (T2 at NPK 310-170-110 kg ha-1) soil conditions. The culturable soil bacterial population was recorded at flowering, boll opening, and harvesting stages, while other rhizosphere biological and chemical properties were recorded at harvesting. Results revealed that Bt-cotton genotypes IUB-222 and FH-142 showed significantly higher rhizosphere total nitrogen, NH4+-N, available phosphorus, and available potassium. Total organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon was also maximum in the rhizosphere of IUB-222 under fertilized conditions. Similarly, bacterial population (CFU g-1) at flowering stage and at harvesting was significantly higher in the rhizosphere of IUB-222 as compared to non-Bt- (IUB-75) and other Bt-cotton genotypes under same growth conditions. It showed that Bt genotypes can help in maintaining soil macronutrients (total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium) under proper nutrient management. Moreover, Bt-cotton genotypes seem to strengthen certain biological properties of the soil, thus increasing the growth and yield capability, maintaining available nutrients in the soil as compared to non-Bt cotton, while no harmful effects of Bt cotton on soil properties was detected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bt cotton; Microbial population; Rhizosphere; Soil fertility; Soil health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28527035     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-5994-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  16 in total

Review 1.  The role of root border cells in plant defense.

Authors:  M C Hawes; U Gunawardena; S Miyasaka; X Zhao
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 18.313

2.  FUNCTION AND MECHANISM OF ORGANIC ANION EXUDATION FROM PLANT ROOTS.

Authors:  PR Ryan; E Delhaize; DL Jones
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2001-06

Review 3.  Impact of genetically modified crops on soil- and plant-associated microbial communities.

Authors:  Kari E Dunfield; James J Germida
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.751

Review 4.  Are root exudates more important than other sources of rhizodeposits in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities?

Authors:  Paul G Dennis; Anthony J Miller; Penny R Hirsch
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 4.194

5.  Community analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria in the maize mycorrhizosphere in a long-term fertilization trial.

Authors:  Jonas F Toljander; Juan C Santos-González; Anders Tehler; Roger D Finlay
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 4.194

6.  Rhizodeposition shapes rhizosphere microbial community structure in organic soil.

Authors:  Eric Paterson; Thomas Gebbing; Claire Abel; Allan Sim; Gillian Telfer
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Induced plant defense responses against chewing insects. Ethylene signaling reduces resistance of Arabidopsis against Egyptian cotton worm but not diamondback moth.

Authors:  H U Stotz; B R Pittendrigh; J Kroymann; K Weniger; J Fritsche; A Bauke; T Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Soil microbial and faunal community responses to bt maize and insecticide in two soils.

Authors:  Bryan S Griffiths; Sandra Caul; Jacqueline Thompson; A Nicholas E Birch; Charles Scrimgeour; Jérôme Cortet; Andrew Foggo; Christine A Hackett; Paul Henning Krogh
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 2.751

9.  Soil bacterial community composition altered by increased nutrient availability in Arctic tundra soils.

Authors:  Akihiro Koyama; Matthew D Wallenstein; Rodney T Simpson; John C Moore
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 10.  The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health.

Authors:  Roeland L Berendsen; Corné M J Pieterse; Peter A H M Bakker
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 18.313

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of Insect-Resistant Maize 2A-7 Expressing mCry1Ab and mCry2Ab on the Soil Ecosystem.

Authors:  Shuke Yang; Xin Liu; Xiaohui Xu; Hongwei Sun; Fan Li; Chaofeng Hao; Xingbo Lu
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-26

2.  Impact of PaGLK transgenic poplar on microbial community and soil enzyme activity in rhizosphere soil.

Authors:  Yu Zheng; Guan Bin Lv; Kun Chen; Qibin Yu; Ben Niu; Jing Jiang; Guifeng Liu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.