| Literature DB >> 35942008 |
Yu Zheng1, Guan Bin Lv1, Kun Chen1, Qibin Yu2, Ben Niu1, Jing Jiang1, Guifeng Liu1.
Abstract
Rhizosphere microorganisms are essential parts in maintaining soil ecological functions. Reforestation using genetically modified trees might have great potential to enhance tree production in biotic and abiotic stress, however, their long-term impact on rhizosphere microorganisms is scant. In this study, we studied soil enzyme activities and composition of rhizosphere microorganisms in 2-year-old transgenic PaGLK overexpression (OE), repressed expression (RE) and wild-type (WT) poplar (P. alba × P.berlinensis). The root exudates of PaGLK transgenic poplar (P.alba × P. berlinensis) were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The results showed that there were significant difference for soil sucrase, urease, catalase, neutral protease and cellulase between the transgenic and WT lines at different growth periods. Alpha diversity analysis showed that bacterial community abundance and diversity for RE lines were significantly lower than WT (p < 0.05), while RE lines for fungi were significantly higher than WT lines. At the genus level, Burkholderia was the dominant group of rhizosphere bacterial community, and the relative abundance for RE was significantly higher than WT. Tomentella was the dominant group for fungi community. Serendipita for RE was significantly higher than WT and OE. Main metabolite contents of (S)-ACPA, geniposidic acid, agnuside, hydroquinone and pyranocoumarins were significantly different among transgenic lines. These results suggest that transgenic activities have effects on root exudates, rhizosphere soil enzyme activities and soil microbial community composition, but long term effects need to be further investigated.Entities:
Keywords: community composition; metabolite; rhizosphere; soil enzyme activity; transgenic
Year: 2022 PMID: 35942008 PMCID: PMC9355801 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.965209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Comparison of rhizosphere soil enzyme activities between transgenic lines and WT. (A) Sucrase activity (B) Urease activity (C) Catalase activity (D) Neutral protease activity (E) Cellulase activity.
FIGURE 2Relative abundance of rhizosphere soil microbial communities in populus in the first 20 orders. (A) Bacteria (B) Fungi.
Alpha diversity of bacteria and fungi in rhizosphere soil of transgenic PaGLK poplar.
| Class | Sample | Observed_species | Chao1 | Shannon | Simpson | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | WT | 4793a | 6015a | 9.967ab | 0.9912a | 0.9694b |
| OE1 | 4863a | 5826ab | 10.31ab | 0.9962a | 0.9722ab | |
| OE2 | 4266bc | 5078bc | 9.849ab | 0.9903a | 0.9769a | |
| OE3 | 4497ab | 5336abc | 10.30a | 0.9974a | 0.9756a | |
| RE1 | 3911c | 4975c | 9.279bc | 0.9856a | 0.9758a | |
| RE2 | 3768c | 4741c | 8.717c | 0.9632b | 0.9773a | |
| RE3 | 4097bc | 5125bc | 9.443bc | 0.9870a | 0.9742ab | |
| Fungi | WT | 465cd | 465.60cd | 3.791cd | 0.8235ab | 0.9999a |
| OE1 | 655ab | 656.03ab | 4.609bc | 0.8402ab | 0.9999a | |
| OE2 | 536bcd | 537.73bcd | 3.828cd | 0.7221bc | 0.9999a | |
| OE3 | 369d | 370.77d | 2.623d | 0.6238c | 0.9999a | |
| RE1 | 721a | 722.35a | 6.045a | 0.9417a | 0.9999a | |
| RE2 | 634abc | 635.49abc | 5.654ab | 0.9397a | 0.9999a | |
| RE3 | 592abc | 593.06abc | 5.906ab | 0.9512a | 0.9999a |
Note: Means with the same letters were not significantly different at p < 0.05.
FIGURE 3ASV Wayne diagram of bacteria and fungi in rhizosphere soil of P. alba × P. berlinensis. (A) Bacteria (B) Fungi.
FIGURE 4PCA of bacterial and fungal community genera in rhizosphere soil between transgenic PaGLK and WT poplar. (A) Bacteria (B) Fungi.
FIGURE 5Abundance clustering heat map of the top 50 bacterial community genera in rhizosphere soil of the test lines.
FIGURE 6Abundance clustering heat map of the top 50 genera in rhizosphere soil fungal communities of the tested lines.
FIGURE 7Wayne diagram of differential metabolites in three groups.
5 differential metabolites between RE vs. WT and OE vs. WT.
| Name | Class | RE_WT | OE_WT |
|---|---|---|---|
| (S)-ACPA | Amino acids, peptides | 0.013 | 0.044 |
| Geniposidic acid | Terpene glycosides | 0.032 | 0.012 |
| Agnuside | Terpene glycosides | 0.040 | 0.025 |
| Hydroquinone | Benzenediols | 0.020 | 0.002 |
| (9R,10R)-10-hydroxy-8,8-dimethyl-9-{[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxy}-2H,8H,9H,10H-pyrano[2,3-h]chromen-2-one | Pyranocoumarins | 0.047 | 0.020 |